2016年-PIIE彼得森国际经济研究所_Support_the_Ex_7页_287kb

Ex-Im Bank Policy Brief Summary

Core Content

The Export-Import Bank (Ex-Im Bank) of the United States is a critical institution for supporting US exports, particularly to developing countries and small businesses. This policy brief argues for the reauthorization and strengthening of the Ex-Im Bank, emphasizing its three primary missions: correcting exaggerated risk assessments for exports to developing countries, increasing the availability of export finance for small businesses, and providing the US Treasury with leverage in international negotiations on export credit rules.

Main Points

1. Ex-Im Bank's Operations and Impact

• The Ex-Im Bank has existed since the Great Depression and provides financing for US exports through four main methods:

  • Loan guarantees (85% of total financing in FY2001, totaling $5.4 billion).
  • Export credit insurance (covering 90–100% of principal, $2.3 billion in FY2001).
  • Direct loans to foreign buyers ($870 million in FY2001).
  • Working capital guarantees (90% coverage, $660 million in FY2001).

• In FY2001, the Bank supported $12.5 billion in exports, which is slightly over 1% of total US exports.

• The Bank is particularly important for small businesses, which account for 90% of authorized transactions, though they receive slightly under 20% of total financing.

• The Bank supports a wide range of industries, including aircraft, energy, high-technology, and agriculture.

2. Support for Developing Countries

• Multinational corporations also face challenges in financing exports to developing countries, especially during financial and political crises.
• Private financial markets are often unwilling to lend to these countries due to high risk.
• The Ex-Im Bank helps fill this gap, with over $4 billion in exposure to countries with the highest risk ratings (OECD).
• During the Korean financial crisis (1998), the Ex-Im Bank supported $1 billion in exports and helped restore confidence in the US market.

3. Leverage in International Negotiations

• The Ex-Im Bank gives the US government leverage in international discussions to reduce export subsidies.
• It helps challenge "market windows" and de facto tied aid, which are distortions in international trade.
• The Bank also helps counter "interest make-up" schemes, where governments subsidize commercial banks by paying commissions on loans.

4. Recommendations for Reauthorization

• The authors advocate for a larger budget authorization of about $6 billion over five years, to support at least $15 billion in annual exports.
• The Senate version of the reauthorization bill is preferred due to its longer duration (through 2006) and higher credit ceiling ($75 billion).
• They support explicit matching of market window terms and increased support for small businesses (18–20% of total financing).
• The House version is criticized for unilateral actions that could undermine international negotiations and for introducing employment mandates that complicate the Bank's operations.

5. Current Legislation and Key Differences

• The House and Senate bills are similar but differ in key areas:
  • Duration: Senate bill reauthorizes through 2006; House through 2005.
  • Tied aid: Senate allows the Treasury to review tied aid actions; House removes this ability.
  • Employment objective: House requires the Bank to maintain or increase employment; Senate does not.
  • Outstanding credits: House increases the ceiling to $100 billion (adjusted for inflation) in FY2003, while Senate keeps it at $75 billion.

Key Information

• The Ex-Im Bank is not just a corporate welfare agency, but a vital tool for export finance and international trade policy.
• Market windows, de facto tied aid, and interest make-up schemes are distortions that need to be addressed.
• Unilateral disarmament (i.e., cutting the Ex-Im Bank's support) could lead to foreign governments increasing their own export subsidies.
• The current OECD Arrangement is not sufficient to address new market distortions.
• The US President's budget for FY2003 supports the Ex-Im Bank's request, but reauthorization is still needed.

Conclusion

The Ex-Im Bank plays a crucial role in supporting US exports, especially to developing countries and small businesses, and is a key instrument in international trade negotiations. Despite the controversy, the Bank should be reauthorized and strengthened to meet its mandates and maintain US competitiveness in global markets.