20170619-法国巴黎银行-CEEMEA_sovereign_credit_navigator_22页_380kb
报告摘要
CEEMEA Sovereign Credit Navigator Summary – 19 June 2017
Core Content
This report provides an analysis of sovereign credit movements in the CEEMEA region, with a focus on relative value opportunities and market performance. It outlines the current credit landscape, including key trends, rating reviews, and specific recommendations.
Main Points
1. Credit Week Outlook
- The Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) remains the central focus for CEEMEA credit.
- There is anticipation of clarity on the list of demands from Saudi Arabia and the UAE to end sanctions on Qatar.
- If Qatar fails to meet many of these demands, there could be a resurgence of tensions and renewed pressure on credit in the near term.
2. Rating Reviews
- No planned rating reviews in CEEMEA this week.
3. Performance Recap
- CEEMEA sovereigns ended last week around 3bp wider on average.
- The GCC saw the strongest performance, with Qatar around 17bp tighter on the week on average, and Kuwait and other GCC countries also outperforming.
- Africa was under the most pressure, particularly oil-exporting countries such as Gabon (31bp wider), Nigeria, and Angola.
- Russia underperformed due to political noise and low oil prices, ending the week 11bp wider on average.
4. Relative Value Opportunities in CEE
- Poland $ bonds are considered expensive relative to other CEE $ bonds and the Poland € curve, with the xccy-adjusted differential near 3m highs.
- The report recommends switching from Poland $ '24s into Republic of Hungary $ '24s.
- High-yielders Croatia and Serbia have outperformed in the $ space, particularly versus Hungary and Slovakia.
- Croatia € bonds have compressed to other CEE curves.
5. GCC Relative Value
- Market weakness in the GCC is attributed to recent tensions and oil price weakness.
- Saudi Arabia stands out as the most expensive name in the region on a historical relative value basis.
Key Information
1. Z Spread Change ($ Bonds)
| Region | 1W | 1M | 3M | 1Y | YTD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CEE | 2 | -26 | -28 | -117 | -60 |
| CIS (ex-Russia) | 4 | -13 | -54 | -160 | -43 |
| GCC | -7 | 7 | 18 | -86 | -12 |
| MENA (ex-GCC) | 0 | 6 | 12 | -125 | -66 |
| Russia | 11 | 6 | 16 | -100 | -22 |
| South Africa | 2 | -5 | 18 | -93 | -20 |
| SSA | 17 | -7 | -25 | -296 | -73 |
| Turkey | -3 | -17 | -37 | -39 | -94 |
2. 1W Outperformers
- Qatar: -17
- Kuwait: -8
- Georgia: -8
- Oman: -5
- Saudi Arabia: -4
- Abu Dhabi: -4
- Turkey: -3
- Egypt: -2
3. 1W Underperformers
- Gabon: 31
- Kenya: 25
- Nigeria: 24
- Angola: 20
- Cameroon: 18
- Rwanda: 17
- Ethiopia: 17
- Ivory Coast: 16
4. Relative Value – CEE $ Bonds
| Buy | Sell |
|---|---|
| Croatia 2020 | Croatia 2021 |
5. Relative Value – Russia, Turkey, South Africa $ Bonds
- The report includes a detailed table of Z-spread differentials for various bond pairs, highlighting relative value opportunities and spreads.
Summary
- The GCC remains a focal point with ongoing tensions and potential for renewed pressure on credit.
- No rating reviews are planned in CEEMEA this week.
- Poland $ bonds are expensive relative to other CEE $ bonds and the € curve, suggesting a relative value opportunity.
- High-yielders in CEE, such as Croatia and Serbia, have outperformed.
- Russia and Turkey have seen some performance improvements, but are still under pressure.
- The report emphasizes the importance of monitoring relative value differentials and market movements for investment decisions.
展开完整摘要
试读结束,高清完整版pdf/doc/ppt,请点下载