2023-11-22-国际清算银行-请真正的稳定币站起来好吗_29页_478kb

Summary of "Will the real stablecoin please stand up?"

This BIS paper examines the stablecoin market's evolution over the past decade and assesses their stability. Stablecoins, designed to maintain value against a peg, are classified into four types: fiat-backed, crypto-backed, commodity-backed, and unbacked. The analysis reveals that no stablecoin consistently maintains parity with its peg. Fiat-backed stablecoins show the least volatility but still fail, while unbacked and some crypto- or commodity-backed coins are highly volatile. Redemption is not guaranteed, and transparency deficits exist, undermining trust. Stablecoins have not proven to be safe stores of value or reliable payment methods, with market turmoil in 2022-2023 further exposing risks. Data gaps on usage hinder risk assessment, and regulatory efforts are increasing but incomplete. Despite issues, stablecoins persist and may evolve.

Key Findings

• Stability: Stablecoins are less volatile than traditional cryptoassets but not fully stable.
• Redemption: No guarantee of full, on-demand redemption.
• Transparency: Lacking clear, audited reserve information.
• Market Dynamics: High concentration in major stablecoins like Tether; user data sparse.

Regulatory and Future Outlook

Ongoing efforts include guidance from CPMI-IOSCO and FSB, but more comprehensive regulation and data are needed. Stablecoins pose risks to financial stability and payment systems, requiring vigilant monitoring and policy development.