伦敦房地产_如何成为了洗钱天堂（英文版）_10页_1mb

London Property: A Top Destination for Money Launderers

Core Content Overview

This report highlights the role of London's property market in facilitating money laundering, particularly through the use of overseas companies registered in secrecy jurisdictions. It leverages data from multiple sources, including leaked databases like the Panama Papers and offshore leaks, as well as open and shared data platforms, to analyze the connections between politically exposed persons (PEPs) and property ownership in London.

Key Findings

• London's property market is vulnerable to money laundering due to the use of anonymous corporate structures and the lack of transparency in beneficial ownership.
• Over 44,000 land titles in London are owned by overseas companies, with nearly 50% of these companies lacking identifiable information.
• Approximately 986 land titles are linked to PEPs, and these are concentrated in high-value areas such as City of Westminster, City of London, and Kensington and Chelsea.
• Over 75% of PEP-related land titles are held by companies based in Panama or the British Virgin Islands, which are known secrecy jurisdictions.
• Complex corporate structures are commonly used to conceal the true beneficial owners of assets, making it difficult for law enforcement to trace illicit funds.

Main Points

• PEPs are high-risk individuals who may be involved in corruption and money laundering. They are often associated with companies registered in secrecy jurisdictions.
• Enhanced due diligence (EDD) is necessary for businesses dealing with PEPs or entities connected to them.
• Data is a powerful tool in the fight against corruption and money laundering, but its effectiveness is limited by data gaps and poor quality.
• The UK has committed to transparency reforms, including a public register of beneficial ownership for overseas companies owning property in the UK, by April 2018.
• The National Crime Agency (NCA) has identified high-end money laundering as a reputational and financial risk to the UK.

Data Sources and Methodology

The report combined data from the following sources:

• Land Registry: Provided data on overseas companies owning land in London.
• ICIJ Offshore Leaks Database: Included information on over 500,000 offshore entities.
• OpenCorporates: An open-source company database with over 110 million entries.
• Thomson Reuters PermiD: A machine-readable identifier for information.
• Thomson Reuters World-Check: A database of risk intelligence on PEPs and other high-risk entities.

The methodology involved four steps:

1. Identifying unique companies in the Land Registry.
2. Matching these to corporate entities in available databases to find connections.
3. Checking if these entities or their owners are listed in World-Check.
4. Cross-referencing with Land Registry data to identify land titles connected to PEPs.

Risk Landscape

• Money laundering involves disguising the illegal origin of funds to appear legitimate.
• London's property market is particularly attractive for laundering due to high property prices and loopholes in due diligence checks.
• The NCA estimates that between £36 billion and £90 billion could be laundered through the UK each year.
• Over 75% of corruption cases involving property in the UK involved anonymous companies from secrecy jurisdictions.

Future Outlook

• Data transparency is essential to combat corruption and money laundering.
• Further data integration and improved data quality are needed to enhance risk detection and due diligence.
• The UK government's commitment to a beneficial ownership register for overseas companies is a positive step towards greater transparency.

Summary of Data Insights

• 54% of overseas companies in the Land Registry could be matched to company records.
• Over 11,000 companies were identified as "unknown companies" due to lack of matching data.
• The highest concentration of PEP-related land titles was found in Kensington and Chelsea (almost 20% of unknown companies).
• The average value of land titles held by overseas companies is £1.9 million, with some exceeding £86 million.
• Only 6% of PEP-related land titles had associated monetary values, indicating significant data limitations.

Conclusion

The report underscores the importance of data transparency and integration in identifying and mitigating money laundering risks in London's property market. While progress has been made, the lack of comprehensive and accurate data remains a major obstacle. Continued efforts to improve beneficial ownership transparency and leverage advanced data analytics are crucial in the fight against corruption.