世界银行-2024财年所罗门群岛国家意见调查报告（英）_39页_1mb

Solomon Islands Country Opinion Survey Report - Summary

1. Overview

• This survey assessed stakeholder perceptions of the World Bank Group (WBG) in Solomon Islands, measuring familiarity, trust, ratings of performance, prioritized development areas, and perceptions of the WBG's role.

2. Key Findings

2.1 Familiarity & Trust (FY24)

• Familiarity: Respondents' familiarity with WBG remained stable (mean 6.4). It increased significantly (to 8.1) for those collaborating with WBG.
• Trust: Trust in WBG improved slightly to 7.9, alongside trust gains in other development partners and institutions. National government and media trustedness showed improvement but remained low.

2.2 Perceived Performance & Priorities

• Key Performance Indicators: High agreement (means: 7.4-7.9) rated WBG's relevance, alignment with priorities, and positive influence on policy as effective. Effectiveness in achieving results was rated higher (7.4) than in influencing policy (7.0) in FY21.
• Collaboration: Highest ratings (average 7.5+) for collaboration with national/central government, other donors, and parliament.
• Priority Areas: Stakeholders wanted WBG focus on Transport, Agriculture/Food Security, Water/Sanitation, Climate Change, and Health/Pandemic Preparedness. Energy decreased.
• Effectiveness: Debt sustainability and Human Development were rated highest (7.3+). Effectiveness declined significantly (noted decrease) in Agriculture, Social Inclusion, and Energy. Collaboration with civil society received lower ratings.

2.3 WBG's Role & Flexibility

• Long-term Partner: Perceived as a long-term partner (overall rating 7.8). Positive perception of WBG's Flexibility improved significantly (mean 5.9).
• Stakeholder Opinion on Effectiveness: Respondents rated WBG's responsiveness, openness, and staff accessibility moderately positively. Key needs identified by stakeholders include simplifying projects, increasing national staff/experts, using local consultants, and clearer implementation guidance.

2.4 Financial Instruments & Knowledge Work

• Valued Instruments: Majority valued the WBG's knowledge work (38% reported having used it). Respondents rated the WBG's insistence on accountability through lending, project monitoring, and knowledge work significance highly (7.4-7.7).
• Financial Conditions: Respondents rated WBG lending conditions as reasonable (mean 6.7).
• Value Requested: Respondents saw most value in Technical assistance/implement support, Knowledge and analytical products, and Capacity development/training.

2.5 Future Role & Improvements

• Key Suggestions: Stakeholders urged WBG to:
  • Collaborate more with local government and the private sector.
  • Engage closely with officials/experts.
  • Focus on infrastructure, agriculture, jobs, and climate change.
  • Enhance knowledge sharing, increase WBG visibility, and improve local media exposure.
• Communication & Outreach: Most preferred direct contact with WBG staff (56%) and events/conferences (53%). WBG was recalled by 57%, mainly via newspapers, social media, and direct contact. Climate change was the most recalled topic.

3. Comparisons (FY24 vs FY21)

• Trust ratings significantly increased across most studied institutions, including WBG, other donors, CBSI, faith-based groups, civil society, and private sector.

• Effectiveness ratings decreased for WBG across several key sectors compared to FY21.

• (Analysis based on the provided text)