EBA欧洲银行-2019-01-24-EBA-Request-for-revised-deadlines-in-the-IFR-and-IFD_5页_265kb
报告摘要
总结:EBA 对 IFR/IFD 技术标准提交期限的修订请求
核心内容
欧洲银行管理局(EBA)向欧盟理事会和欧洲议会提交了一份关于修订《投资公司条例》(IFR)和《投资公司指令》(IFD)中技术标准提交期限的正式请求。EBA 认为当前的期限设置过于紧凑,可能影响技术标准的质量和监管工作的有效性。
主要观点
-
当前期限问题
EBA 指出,按照欧盟委员会、欧洲议会和欧盟理事会的提案,技术标准的提交期限通常设定为进入生效后 9 个月。然而,这种压缩时间表难以满足监管工作的复杂性,影响监管产品的质量。 -
建议修订期限
为确保监管工作的质量,EBA 建议将技术标准的提交期限分为三个阶段,分别设定为 12、18 和 24 个月。这一调整旨在为投资公司、监管机构和成员国提供足够的时间来实施和评估新要求。 -
监管实施的复杂性
EBA 强调,投资公司需要时间适应新要求,监管机构需评估新监管框架的有效性,成员国需将指令转化为国内法律,同时监管机构还需升级IT基础设施以支持新标准的实施。 -
联合监管产品的问题
EBA 提议限制联合监管产品(Joint Regulatory Products)的使用,仅在特殊情况下采用。这将有助于减少审批流程中的延误,提高效率。 -
对现有指南的审查
EBA 建议在 IFR/IFD 生效后 3 年内,对所有适用的投资公司指南进行一次全面审查,并明确该审查的期限。
关键信息
技术标准提交期限建议
| 文件 | 条款 | 段落 | 任务描述 | 原始期限 | EBA 建议期限 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IFR | 7 | 4 | RTS on prudential consolidation | 6 months after EIF | 12 months after EIF |
| IFR | 9 | 2 (e) (v) | Monitoring and publication of eligible own funds instruments | No deadline | No deadline |
| IFR | 13 | 4 | RTS to specify the calculation of the fixed overheads requirement | 9 months after EIF | 12 months after EIF |
| IFR | 15 | 5 | RTS to specify the methods for measuring the K-factors and adjusting their coefficients | No deadline | 12 months after EIF |
| IFR | 15 | 5 | RTS on the definition of segregated account | 9 months after EIF | 12 months after EIF |
| IFR | 15 | 5 | RTS on the inclusion of advice in K-AUM | 9 months after EIF | 12 months after EIF |
| IFR | 23 | 2 | RTS to specify the calculation of the initial margin for K-CMG | 9 months after EIF | 12 months after EIF |
| IFR | 43 | 2a | GL on exceptional circumstances for reducing liquid assets | No deadline | No deadline |
| IFR | 48 | 2 | RTS to specify templates for own funds disclosures | 9 months after EIF | 18 months after EIF |
| IFR | 51a | 3 | RTS to specify templates for investment policy disclosures | 9 months after EIF | 18 months after EIF |
| IFR | 52 | 3 | ITS on supervisory reporting | 9 months after EIF | 12 months after EIF |
| IFR | 53 | 4 | RTS on the information related to the thresholds for credit institutions | January 1st 2019 | 12 months after EIF |
| IFD | 4a | - | RTS on the criteria for subjecting certain investment firms to the CRR | 9 months after EIF | 12 months after EIF |
| IFD | 11 | 6 | RTS on information exchange between CAs in different member states | 6 months after EIF | 2 years after EIF |
| IFD | 11 | 7 | ITS to establish standard forms, templates and procedures for the supervisory information sharing | 6 months after EIF | 2 years after EIF |
| IFD | 23 | 6 | RTS to specify the eligibility criteria for small and non-interconnected investment firms | 9 months after EIF | 12 months after EIF |
| IFD | 24 | 4 | RTS to specify the content of the application of governance arrangements | 12 months after EIF | 18 months after EIF |
| IFD | 28 | 4 | RTS to specify appropriate criteria to identify individuals with material impact on risk profile | 9 months after EIF | 18 months after EIF |
| IFD | 30 | 6 | RTS to specify instruments for variable remuneration convertible into CET1 | 9 months after EIF | 18 months after EIF |
| IFD | 32 | 1 | Annual report on remuneration trends and practices | No deadline | No deadline |
| IFD | 32 | 3 | GL on sound and gender neutral remuneration policies | No deadline | No deadline |
| IFD | 32 | 4 | GL on supervisory information on high earners | No deadline | No deadline |
| IFD | 32a | - | Report and (if appropriate GL) of technical criteria related to exposures with substantial ESG for SREP | 2 years after EIF | 2 years after EIF |
| IFD | 34 | 4 | GL on benchmarking of internal models | No deadline | No deadline |
| IFD | 37 | 6 | RTS on Pillar 2 add-ons | 9 months after EIF | 18 months after EIF |
| IFD | 41 | 2 | GL on procedures and methodologies for the SREP | No deadline | No deadline |
| IFD | 44 | 8 | RTS on the conditions for the establishment of a college of supervisors | 9 months after EIF | 2 years after EIF |
| IFD | 53 | 4 | ITS on supervisory disclosure | 9 months after EIF | 12 months after EIF |
其他建议
- 对于没有明确期限的任务,EBA 建议保留其原始提案,以避免提前设定不可预见的复杂性。
- EBA 提出在 IFR/IFD 生效后 3 年内,对所有适用的指南进行一次全面审查,以确保其持续适用性和有效性。
- EBA 强调应避免过度使用联合监管产品,以减少审批流程中的延误。
结论
EBA 的建议旨在优化 IFR/IFD 技术标准的制定与实施过程,确保监管工作的质量和时效性,同时考虑到各方的实施需求和资源限制。EBA 希望立法者在制定最终时间表时,能够采纳这些建议,并在必要时明确优先级。
展开完整摘要
试读结束,高清完整版pdf/doc/ppt,请点下载