2016年-世界发展银行全球_Kazakhstan_Agricultural_Sector_Risk_Assessment_201页_5mb
报告摘要
Agricultural Sector Risk Assessment in Kazakhstan: Summary
Core Content
This report presents a comprehensive risk assessment of Kazakhstan's agricultural sector, focusing on the identification, quantification, and prioritization of risks. It outlines a three-phase approach to improving agricultural risk management, emphasizing the need for a more integrated and systemic response to both production and price risks. The analysis is based on data from 1994 to 2012 and highlights the increasing vulnerability of the sector due to climate change, market volatility, and policy uncertainties.
Main Agro-Ecological Zones
Kazakhstan is divided into several agro-ecological zones, each with distinct climatic and soil conditions. These zones influence the types of crops and livestock that can be produced, as well as the associated risks. The report identifies the need for region-specific strategies to address these challenges.
Key Risks Identified
1. Production Risks
- Drought is the most frequent risk, but not the most severe.
- Floods and locust infestations also pose significant threats, especially in northern regions.
- Weather variability and natural disasters impact crop and livestock production.
- Climate change increases the frequency and severity of extreme weather events and reduces water availability for irrigation.
2. Price Risks
- Fluctuations in agricultural product and input prices affect the profitability of farmers and agri-businesses.
- Exchange rate volatility and international market instability compound these risks.
3. Enabling Environment Risks
- Policy changes and regulatory uncertainties can disrupt agricultural operations.
- Access to credit, labor shortages, and limited information are considered constraints rather than risks.
Risk Analysis Findings
- The largest shocks to agricultural output result from the combination of drought and exogenous price shocks.
- Crop production is more vulnerable to risk than livestock, due to its heavy reliance on dryland wheat for export.
- Wheat production accounts for approximately two-thirds of total cropped area, increasing the sector's exposure to both production and price risks.
- Price volatility is high due to international market fluctuations and domestic policy changes.
Recommendations and Solution Areas
The report proposes three key solution areas to enhance risk management in the agricultural sector:
1. Improve Wheat Productivity
- Develop drought-tolerant, heat-resistant, and disease-resistant wheat varieties.
- Strengthen national research programs in wheat pathology, climate resilience, and varietal testing.
- Align wheat classification systems with international export standards.
- Promote climate-smart technologies such as conservation agriculture, no-till production, and precision agriculture.
- Conduct a feasibility study for irrigation to increase productivity in drought-prone areas.
2. Diversify Agricultural Production
- Expand technology diversification through the adoption of climate-smart practices.
- Promote land use diversification by reclamation of underutilized cropland (4.5–5 million hectares).
- Encourage crop diversification by substituting traditional crops with high-value alternatives (1 million hectares) and increasing the production of fodder and feed crops (0.5 million hectares).
- Implement pasture cropping pilots and scale up to 2.5 million hectares to improve feed availability.
3. Improve Livestock Productivity
- Enhance pasture management through community-based approaches and improved monitoring systems.
- Develop livestock early warning systems (LEWS) to improve emergency preparedness.
- Strengthen animal health services, including vaccination programs and improved access to feed and fodder.
- Expand index-based livestock insurance and conditional loans/grants to support risk transfer mechanisms.
- Promote sustainable rangeland management and soil and water conservation to reduce degradation.
Key Interventions and Monitoring Indicators
| Main Activities | Expected Outcome | Proposed Monitoring Indicators |
|---|---|---|
| Climate-resilient technologies | Solutions for drought risk management | Report |
| Marketing study for cereals diversification | Directions to developing markets of cereals | Report |
| Promotion of climate smart solutions | Reduction in yield and price volatility | % of areas with climate smart technologies |
| Strategy for crops breeding and research | Strategy for climate resilient crops | Report |
| Feasibility study for irrigation | Directions for developing irrigation system | Report |
| Grain quality diversification | Directions for wheat diversification and marketing, new grading system | Report |
| Drought research center and network | Capacity to develop drought resilient crops and technologies | Availability of infrastructure, equipment and trained staff |
| Wheat pathology center | Capacity to deal with wheat diseases | Availability of infrastructure, equipment and trained staff |
| Capacity of the State Variety Release Commission | Well-functioning system of varieties testing, release and protection | Availability of infrastructure, equipment and trained staff |
| Risk management grants | Reduction in yield and price volatility | Area under climate resilient technologies and yield |
| Expansion of no-till area (2.5 million hectares) | Climate resilience; improved yields by 30%; increased output | No-till area, yields, farm income |
| Adoption of precision agriculture (5.5 million hectares) | Increased output; reduced losses | Yields, farm income |
| Kazhydromet upgrading | Increased information | Agro-meteorological data at producer level |
| Development of drought-tolerant varieties (50 new varieties) | Climate-smart agriculture varieties available | Number of varieties registered |
| Reduction of losses (storage and elevators) | Reduced losses | % of losses |
| Reclamation of unused or underutilized cropland (4.5–5 million hectares) | Average 4.75 million hectares with US$1.2 billion output per year | Reclaimed hectares |
| Adoption of no-till methods on the same area | Climate resilience; improved yields by 30%; increased output | No-till area, yields, farm income |
| Crop substitution with high-earning crops (1 million hectares) | 1 million hectares producing US$350 million output per year | Area substituted by crop |
| Crop diversification with fodder and feed crops (0.5 million hectares) | 0.5 million hectares producing US$90 million output per year | Additional fodder area |
| Pasture cropping pilot (1,600 hectares) | System improved capacity and efficiency | Yields, farm income |
| Pasture cropping (2.5 million hectares) | 1.2 million feed unit tons that would satisfy feeding needs of 0.5 million livestock | Yields, farm income |
| Support to agro-chemistry (12.5 million hectares) | Higher yields, increased farm income | Yields, farm income |
| Capacity development program | System improved capacity and efficiency | Producers, institutions targeted |
Recommendations
- Mainstream risk mitigation into sector development and investment programs.
- Develop risk transfer mechanisms where feasible, such as insurance products and conditional loans.
- Strengthen public institutions responsible for ex-ante and ex-post risk management.
- Continue exploring hedging instruments to reduce cereal price risk.
- Improve access to agricultural insurance based on previous World Bank Group work.
- Promote collaboration between public and private stakeholders to enhance resilience and competitiveness.
Conclusion
The report underscores the need for a systematic and integrated approach to agricultural risk management in Kazakhstan. By focusing on wheat productivity, agricultural diversification, and livestock resilience, the recommendations aim to reduce short and medium-term volatility and improve long-term sustainability and growth in the sector. The findings highlight the importance of climate-smart technologies, policy coherence, and capacity building in achieving these goals.
试读结束,高清完整版pdf/doc/ppt,请点下载