清华大学_APEC：2022亚太城市产业可持续性指数（英文版）_28页_5mb

Asia-Pacific Industrial Sustainability Index 2022 Summary

Core Content

The Asia-Pacific Industrial Sustainability Index (AP-ISI) is a comprehensive tool developed by the Center for Industrial Development and Environmental Governance (CIDEG) at Tsinghua University in collaboration with the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) China Business Council. It aims to evaluate the sustainability of urban industries in the Asia-Pacific region, highlighting best practices and identifying opportunities for improvement. The index is based on the DPSIR framework (Driver-Pressure-State-Impact-Response), which provides a structured approach to analyzing the interactions between industrial development and the economic, social, and ecological systems of cities.

The AP-ISI assesses 35 cities across the Asia-Pacific region, including major, emerging, and island economies, from 2017 to 2020. It is composed of five primary indexes, 12 secondary indexes, and 25 tertiary indexes, organized into three dimensions: input, output, and regulation. The index is designed to measure not only the level of industrial development but also its sustainability, considering both environmental and social impacts.

Main Points

1. Urban Industrial Sustainability

• Industrial development is a key driver of regional and urban growth, but it also brings challenges such as resource constraints, environmental degradation, and social inequality.
• Sustainability in industrial development refers to the ability of a city to balance economic, social, and ecological factors while maintaining long-term development.
• Urban areas are central to industrial sustainability, as they provide the necessary factors and institutional support for sustainable industrial growth.
• The index emphasizes the importance of scientific industrial planning, effective resource allocation, and urban governance in achieving sustainable industrial development.

2. Focus on the Asia-Pacific Region

• The Asia-Pacific region is home to 60% of the global population, with a diverse economic and industrial structure.
• It includes major economies (e.g., the U.S., China, Japan), emerging economies, and island economies, each facing different challenges and opportunities in achieving industrial sustainability.
• The region has become a global leader in innovation, but also faces significant resource consumption and environmental problems due to rapid industrialization and urbanization.

3. Assessing Urban Industrial Sustainability

3.1 Analytical Framework

• The DPSIR framework is used to assess the sustainability of urban industries.
• It evaluates drivers, pressures, states, impacts, and responses to provide a holistic view of industrial sustainability.
• The framework helps in understanding the causal chain between industrial activities and their environmental and social consequences.

3.2 Index System

• The index system is divided into five primary dimensions:

  • Drivers (20%): Basic and advanced production factors.
  • Pressures (20%): Resource and environmental constraints.
  • States (20%): Industrial scale and structure.
  • Impacts (20%): Economic, social, and ecological effects.
  • Responses (20%): Policy measures and actions to support sustainability.

• Key tertiary indexes include:

  • Labor supply and capital stock (basic production factors)
  • Technological innovation and digitalization level (advanced production factors)
  • Renewable energy share and land use (resource constraints)
  • Forest coverage, soil carbon content, and air quality index (environmental capacities)
  • Industrial value added and emerging industry (industrial scale)
  • Service industry share and high-tech industry share (industrial structure)
  • Per capita GDP and GDP growth (economic growth)
  • New employment and Gini coefficient (social well-being)
  • Terminal CO2 emissions and Ocean Health Index (ecosystem impact)
  • Ease of doing business and entrepreneurial activity (business environment)
  • International communications and urban governance (responses)

3.3 Evaluation Methodology

• The methodology involves data collection, standardization, and analysis based on the DPSIR framework.
• It integrates quantitative data with qualitative case studies to provide a balanced assessment.
• The evaluation covers performance across different city types, including major, emerging, and island economies.

3.4 Sample Selection

• The 35 cities selected for evaluation represent a diverse range of economies and development levels.
• The sample includes cities from major economies, emerging economies, and island economies, allowing for comparative analysis.

Evaluation Results

• The top 10 cities in the overall AP-ISI ranking (2020) are: Tokyo, Beijing, Singapore, Toronto, Shenzhen, San Francisco, Hong Kong, Seoul, Shanghai, and New York City.
• Drivers (production factors): Top cities include Tokyo, Shenzhen, San Francisco, Seoul, Suzhou, Guangzhou, Beijing, Chengdu, Shanghai, and Houston.
• Pressures (resource and environmental constraints): Top cities are Fiji, Papua New Guinea, Brunei Darussalam, New York City, Taipei, Toronto, Auckland, Chengdu, Hong Kong, and Beijing.
• States (industrial development level): Top cities are Tokyo, Seoul, Singapore, Beijing, Taipei, New York City, Hong Kong, San Francisco, Bangkok, and Mexico City.
• Impacts (economic-social-ecological effects): Top cities include Taipei, Singapore, Suzhou, San Francisco, Shenzhen, Auckland, Toronto, Guangzhou, Brunei Darussalam, and Shanghai.
• Responses (policy and action): Top cities are Singapore, Beijing, Toronto, San Francisco, Hong Kong, Shanghai, Suzhou, Mexico City, Shenzhen, and Auckland.

Best Practices

The report highlights several case studies from cities across the Asia-Pacific region, showcasing successful strategies for industrial sustainability:

• Singapore: Boosting industrial upgrades by introducing and nurturing talent.
• Tokyo: Focusing on cutting-edge technology to promote industrial development.
• Fiji: Leveraging blue industries (marine-related industries) for sustainable development.
• Bangkok: Rebuilding its competitive edge in the tourism industry amid challenges.
• New Zealand: Achieving ecological and environmental success alongside industrial sustainability.
• Shenzhen: Demonstrating the synergistic effect of technology enterprises.
• Beijing: Transforming from a heavy industrial base to a green growth model.

Summary and Prospects

• The AP-ISI identifies opportunity gaps in sustainable urban industrial development, particularly in emerging and island economies.

• Recommendations include:

  • Optimizing the allocation of production factors.
  • Alleviating resource and environmental constraints.
  • Upgrading industrial structure and promoting green transformation.
  • Unifying economic, social, and ecological benefits.
  • Ensuring positive urban responses through improved governance and policies.

• The report emphasizes the need for policy coordination and strategic planning at both national and urban levels to address these gaps and promote sustainable industrial development.

• It also calls for greater emphasis on social well-being in emerging economies and enhanced climate governance in major economies.

Key Takeaways

• Industrial sustainability is a critical factor in the long-term development of urban areas.
• The DPSIR framework provides a robust structure for evaluating the sustainability of urban industries.
• Cities in major economies generally have stronger technological and digital capabilities, while emerging and island economies need to focus on green development and sustainable practices.
• Urban governance and policy measures play a crucial role in promoting sustainable industrial development.
• The AP-ISI serves as a decision-making reference for public policy, investment, and entrepreneurship in the region.

Conclusion

The Asia-Pacific Industrial Sustainability Index 2022 provides a detailed and structured assessment of urban industrial sustainability across the region. It underscores the importance of balanced development, innovation, and sustainable governance in achieving long-term industrial and urban prosperity. By identifying best practices and opportunity gaps, the report offers valuable insights for policymakers and stakeholders to guide future industrial development in the Asia-Pacific.