2016年-世界发展银行全球_FY15_Tunisia_Country_Opinion_Survey_Report_134页_3mb

报告摘要

FY15 Tunisia Country Opinion Survey Report Summary

Core Content

This report presents the findings of the FY15 Tunisia Country Opinion Survey conducted by the World Bank Group's Public Opinion Research Group (PORG). The survey aimed to assess stakeholders' perceptions of the WBG's work in Tunisia, focusing on general issues, overall attitudes, effectiveness, knowledge work, and future roles.

Main Views and Key Information

I. Objectives

The survey explored stakeholders' views on:
- General issues facing Tunisia
- Overall attitudes toward the WBG
- The WBG's effectiveness and results
- The WBG's knowledge work and activities
- Collaboration with the WBG
- The WBG's future role in Tunisia
- Communication and outreach efforts

II. Methodology

Conducted from May to June 2015, the survey invited 763 stakeholders to provide their opinions.
A total of 202 stakeholders participated, resulting in a 27% response rate.
The data were compared to the FY12 survey (44% response rate, N=58).
Due to the small sample size in FY12, only basic unweighted comparisons were made.
The survey included indicator questions for the WBG's annual Corporate Scorecard.

III. Demographics of the Sample

Respondents were drawn from various sectors, including government, private sector, NGOs, academia, and media.
Respondents from the Office of the President/Prime Minister/Minister and the office of a parliamentarian were most positive about the country's direction.
The sample included representatives from the Office of the President/Prime Minister, ministries, PMUs, and other stakeholder groups.
No respondents from trade unions, faith-based groups, or the judiciary branch were included.
The geographic distribution was limited, with few respondents from coastal cities, other urban centers, and rural/mountainous areas, making location-based analysis unreliable.

IV. General Issues Facing Tunisia

Headed in the Right Direction: Respondents in FY15 were more positive about Tunisia's direction compared to FY12.
Development Priorities: The top priorities were "job creation/employment" (56%), "poverty reduction" (36%), "economic growth" (32%), and "governance" (30%).
Poverty Reduction Factors: The most important factors were "economic growth" (57%), "job creation/employment" (43%), and "rural/agricultural development" (40%).
Shared Prosperity: Respondents identified "economic growth" and "equity" as key to achieving shared prosperity.
Poverty Gap: A majority of respondents considered the wealth gap in Tunisia to be a very big or moderately big problem.
Climate Change: A significant portion of respondents viewed global climate change as a very serious problem.

V. Overall Attitudes toward the World Bank Group

Effectiveness of WBG: The mean effectiveness rating was 5.76 (out of 10).
Development Results: The mean rating for the WBG's contribution to development results was 5.67.
Transition Period Support: Respondents rated the WBG's support during the transition period as 5.57.
Staff Preparedness: The mean rating for staff preparedness was 5.63.
Collaboration with WBG: Respondents who collaborated with the WBG gave significantly higher ratings (mean = 6.4) compared to non-collaborators (mean = 5.6).
Greatest Value: "Financial resources" (55%) and "technical assistance" (45%) were identified as the greatest values.
Most Effective Instruments: "Technical assistance" (50%), "investment lending" (50%), and "capacity development" (50%) were considered the most effective in poverty reduction.
Capacity Building: Respondents rated the importance and effectiveness of capacity building work in various areas.
Greatest Weakness: "Not enough public disclosure of its work" (40%) was identified as the greatest weakness.
Correlational Analysis: Key drivers of effectiveness included poverty reduction and social protection for overall effectiveness, and job creation, social protection, economic growth, and trade/exports for development results.

VI. Sectoral Effectiveness

Effectiveness in Sectoral Areas: Respondents in FY15 had higher agreement with the WBG's role in development compared to FY12.
Collaboration Impact: Collaborators with the WBG had significantly higher agreement with statements about the WBG's work.
Private Public Partnerships: The WBG's role in promoting private public partnerships was rated by respondents.
Support for the Poorest: The extent to which the WBG's work supports the poorest in Tunisia was assessed.
Knowledge Work Timeliness: Respondents in FY15 rated the timeliness of the WBG's knowledge work higher than in FY12.
Practical Solutions and Language Translation: Lower ratings were given for the WBG's knowledge leading to practical solutions and being translated into local languages.
Financial Instruments: Respondents evaluated the extent to which the WBG's financial instruments met Tunisia's needs.

VII. How the World Bank Group Operates

Work in Tunisia: Respondents rated the WBG's work in Tunisia as more relevant in FY15 than in FY12.
Development Partner Effectiveness: The WBG's effectiveness as a development partner was assessed across various dimensions.
Collaboration Impact: Collaborators gave significantly higher ratings for the WBG's effectiveness as a development partner.

VIII. World Bank Group's Knowledge and Instruments

Knowledge Work Usage: Stakeholders from the Office of the President/Prime Minister/Minister, PMUs, academia, and media used the WBG's knowledge work most frequently.
Meeting Knowledge Needs: Respondents agreed that the WBG meets Tunisia's knowledge needs.
Contribution to Development Results: The significance of the WBG's knowledge work in development was rated.
Technical Quality: The technical quality of the WBG's knowledge work was rated by respondents.
Measurement and Monitoring: Respondents assessed the WBG's ability to measure and correct its work in real time.

IX. The Future Role of the World Bank Group in Tunisia

Local Presence: Stakeholders were asked whether the WBG should increase its local presence.
Selectivity of Support: Respondents were asked to describe the nature of the WBG's support in Tunisia.
Enhancing Value: Suggestions included reducing the complexity of financing and improving the quality of experts.
Collaboration with Groups: Respondents recommended increased collaboration with NGOs and the private sector.
Resource Focus Areas: The top areas for resource focus were "rural/agricultural development" (42%) and "governance" (30%).
Future Services: Respondents suggested the WBG should offer more "technical assistance" and "capacity development" services.