2015年-世界发展银行全球_FY15_China_Country_Opinion_Survey_Report_111页_1mb

报告摘要

FY15 China Country Opinion Survey Report Summary

Core Content

This report presents the findings of the FY15 China Country Opinion Survey conducted by the World Bank Group's Public Opinion Research Group (PORG). The survey aimed to understand how stakeholders in China perceive the WBG's work, focusing on general issues facing China, overall attitudes toward the WBG, sectoral importance and effectiveness, and the future role of the WBG in China. The report also addresses the WBG's communication and outreach strategies.

Main Objectives

To gain insight into stakeholders' perceptions of the WBG's effectiveness and relevance in China.
To identify key areas of concern and development priorities.
To assess the WBG's role in poverty reduction, shared prosperity, and collaboration with local entities.
To evaluate the WBG's communication and information-sharing practices.

Methodology

The survey was conducted from May to July 2015.
570 stakeholders were invited to participate, but only 184 (32% response rate) completed it.
Stakeholders were drawn from various sectors, including government, private sector, NGOs, and academia.
Data were weighted to allow for comparison with the FY12 survey, which had a 40% response rate (N=207).
The report includes aggregated data from indicator questions used in the World Bank Group's annual Corporate Scorecard.

Demographics of the Sample

Respondents were primarily from ministries, project management units (PMUs), and consultants working on WBG projects.
Fewer respondents were from the financial sector, private sector, NGOs, and state-owned enterprises.
The Central Bank and regulatory agency were not represented in the sample.
Stakeholders were categorized based on their geographic location and primary specialization.

General Issues Facing China

Future of the Next Generation: Respondents showed a range of views, with a notable shift in perception compared to FY12.
Development Priorities: The top priorities identified were "government effectiveness/governance" (37%), "inequality" (22%), and "social stability" (16%).
Poverty Reduction: Key areas contributing to poverty reduction were "strengthening social protection" (37%), "reducing inequality" (31%), and "increasing access to quality education" (22%).
Shared Prosperity: Respondents highlighted the importance of economic growth and equity, with a focus on job creation, health, and social protection.
Income Inequality: A significant portion of respondents viewed the gap between the rich and poor as a "very big problem" or "moderately big problem".
Climate Change: Most respondents perceived global climate change as a "very serious problem".

Overall Attitudes Toward the World Bank Group

Effectiveness: The WBG's overall effectiveness rating was 6.9 (on a 1–10 scale), slightly lower than FY12.
Development Results: The WBG was generally seen as helpful in achieving development results.
Staff Preparedness: Respondents rated the WBG's staff preparedness as "moderately effective".
Familiarity: Respondents in FY15 showed lower familiarity with the WBG compared to FY12.
Key Drivers of Effectiveness: Areas with the highest correlations to overall effectiveness included regulatory framework, railway, communicable/non-communicable diseases, and environmental sustainability.
Key Weaknesses: The main weaknesses identified were "slow and complex processes" (55%) and "failing to adapt global knowledge to local conditions" (27%).

Sectoral Importance and Effectiveness

The WBG was rated as effective in various development sectors, with a focus on poverty reduction and environmental sustainability.
Collaboration with the WBG significantly influenced perceptions of effectiveness in specific areas.
Key areas for future focus included poverty reduction, environmental improvement, and natural resource management.

How the World Bank Group Operates

The WBG's work in China was generally viewed positively, with higher agreement on prompt fund disbursement and collaboration with the government.
However, responsiveness was rated lower in FY15 compared to FY12.
Internal measuring and monitoring were considered "somewhat effective" by most respondents.

Knowledge and Instruments

The WBG's knowledge work and activities were seen as somewhat relevant and technically sound.
Respondents were less likely to view the WBG as a source of relevant global good practices compared to FY12.
The WBG's financial instruments were rated as meeting China's needs.
Preferred information sources included the Internet and local newspapers.

Communication and Outreach

Stakeholders primarily used the Internet and local newspapers for information on development issues.
Preferred methods of receiving information from the WBG included workshops/conferences, the World Bank website, and face-to-face meetings.
The WBG's access to information policy was not widely known, and website navigation was rated lower in FY15 compared to FY12.
Social media channels were used by a minority of respondents, but were generally viewed as valuable sources of information.

Future Role of the World Bank Group in China

Stakeholders suggested the WBG should collaborate more with local governments, private sector, and civil society.
There was a shift in perception regarding the WBG's involvement in China's development strategies, with fewer respondents believing it was at an optimal level.
The WBG should focus on poverty reduction, environmental improvement, and natural resource management.

Key Information and Insights

The survey included 184 respondents, with a response rate of 32%.
Data were weighted for year-to-year comparison.
Stakeholder groups were similar in their overall ratings, though specific areas of effectiveness varied.
The WBG's communication and outreach efforts were generally viewed as somewhat effective, but there was room for improvement in accessibility and responsiveness.
The WBG's knowledge work was seen as technically sound but less relevant compared to previous years.
The WBG's role in promoting private-public partnerships and supporting the poorest was rated positively.