2016年-世界发展银行全球_FY16_Niger_Country_Opinion_Survey_Report_113页_3mb
报告摘要
FY 2016 Niger Country Opinion Survey Report Summary
Core Content Overview
This report presents the findings of the FY 2016 Niger Country Opinion Survey (COS), conducted by the World Bank Group's Public Opinion Research Group (PORG). The survey aimed to understand stakeholders' perceptions of the World Bank Group (WBG) in Niger, focusing on its general effectiveness, development priorities, and communication strategies.
Main Objectives
- To assess stakeholders' views on the WBG's work in Niger.
- To explore general issues facing the country.
- To evaluate the WBG's effectiveness and results.
- To identify the WBG's knowledge work and activities.
- To examine the WBG's role in poverty reduction and development.
- To assess the WBG's communication and outreach efforts.
Methodology
- Survey Period: March to June 2016.
- Sample Size: 270 stakeholders were invited; 229 participated (85% response rate).
- Stakeholder Groups: Included government officials, project managers, consultants, NGOs, private sector, academia, and others.
- Data Comparison: Results were compared to the FY 2013 COS (65% response rate, N=194) and the FY 2015 PLR Survey (N=214).
- Weighting: Data was weighted to ensure comparable stakeholder composition across years.
- Indicator Questions: Specific questions were included for the WBG's annual Corporate Scorecard.
Demographics of the Sample
- Combined Groups:
- Financial sector/private banks combined with private sector organizations.
- NGOs, trade unions, faith-based groups, etc., combined into the "CSO" category.
- Government offices and others grouped into the "Other" category.
- Geographic Location: Respondents outside Niamey were grouped into "Other".
- Familiarity with WBG:
- FY 2016 mean familiarity rating: 5.2.
- FY 2013 mean familiarity rating: 6.1.
- Familiarity was strongly correlated with perceived effectiveness and relevance of the WBG in development.
General Issues Facing Niger
- Direction of the Country:
- FY 2016 respondents were less likely to believe Niger is headed in the right direction than FY 2013 respondents.
- Development Priorities:
- Top priorities in FY 2016: Education (38%), Food security (30%), Public sector governance (29%).
- FY 2015 PLR Survey: Education (54%), Food security (37%), Public sector governance (30%).
- Poverty Reduction Drivers:
- Rural development (51%), anti-corruption (28%), education (27%).
- Shared Prosperity:
- Respondents identified economic growth and equity as key elements.
- Climate Change:
- All respondents viewed it as a serious problem.
Overall Attitudes Toward the WBG
- Effectiveness Rating:
- FY 2016 mean rating: 6.9.
- FY 2013 mean rating: 7.0.
- Ratings were significantly different between the two years.
- Collaboration Impact:
- Collaborators had a higher mean rating (7.0) than non-collaborators (6.1).
- Perceived Weakness:
- Imposing technocratic solutions without political consideration (36%).
- Greatest Value:
- Financial resources (investment lending and policy-based lending) were most valued.
- Most Effective Instruments:
- Investment lending (63%), capacity development (54%), and policy-based lending (47%).
Sectoral Effectiveness
- Key Drivers of Effectiveness:
- Public sector governance/reform, urban development, and global/regional integration were most strongly correlated with overall effectiveness.
- Job creation/employment, poverty reduction, and food security were most strongly correlated with achieving development results.
- Private Public Partnerships:
- Respondents rated the WBG's role in promoting private public partnerships as moderately effective.
- Helping the Poorest:
- Ratings varied, with some stakeholders indicating significant support.
How the WBG Operates
- Year Comparison:
- Perceptions of the WBG's work in Niger were significantly different from FY 2013.
- Collaboration Impact:
- Collaborators had more positive views on the WBG's effectiveness.
- Internal Measuring and Monitoring:
- Mean rating: 6.9.
- Respondents believed the WBG measures and evaluates its work in real time.
WBG's Knowledge and Instruments
- Frequency of Consultation:
- Academia/research institutes/think tanks consulted the WBG's knowledge work most frequently.
- Meeting Knowledge Needs:
- Mean rating: 6.8.
- Respondents believed the WBG met Niger's knowledge needs.
- Technical Quality:
- Mean rating: 7.2.
- High technical quality was perceived.
- Financial Instruments:
- Mean rating: 6.8.
- Respondents felt the WBG's financial instruments met Niger's needs.
- Preferred Services:
- Respondents suggested the WBG should focus more on poverty reduction, education, and health.
Future Role of the WBG in Niger
- Making Greater Value:
- Improve the quality of experts (48%), reach out more to non-government groups (33%).
- Collaboration:
- Respondents suggested more collaboration with NGOs and local governments.
- Resource Focus:
- Top priorities: Public sector governance (40%), poverty reduction (34%), education (34%).
- Service Combination:
- Respondents indicated the WBG should offer more investment lending and policy-based lending.
Communication and Outreach
- Preferred Information Sources:
- Local newspapers (48%), Internet (46%).
- Preferred WBG Communication Channels:
- World Bank website (61%) was the most preferred.
- Internet Access:
- Only 57% of respondents had Internet access.
- Website Usage:
- Respondents primarily used mobile data and home broadband.
- Social Media Use:
- Use of WBG's social media channels was reported.
Key Findings
- Stakeholder familiarity with the WBG has declined since FY 2013.
- Perceived effectiveness of the WBG has slightly decreased.
- Collaboration with the WBG is positively correlated with higher effectiveness ratings.
- The WBG is seen as a key player in knowledge and financial services.
- Future priorities include improving expertise, increasing collaboration, and focusing on poverty reduction and education.
Appendices
- Appendix A: All responses across all respondents.
- Appendix B: Responses by stakeholder groups.
- Appendix C: Responses by geographic location.
- Appendix D: Responses by level of collaboration.
- Appendix E: Year comparisons.
- Appendix F: Indicator questions by exposure to the WBG.
展开完整摘要
试读结束,高清完整版pdf/doc/ppt,请点下载