EBA欧洲银行-Competition-and-stability-in-banking-28EBA29_53页_479kb

Summary of "Competition and Stability in Banking" by Xavier Vives

Core Content

The document explores the complex relationship between competition and stability in the banking sector, emphasizing the need for a coordinated approach between regulation and competition policy. It argues that while competition is beneficial for efficiency, innovation, and consumer service, it also introduces risks that can challenge financial stability. The key challenge is managing the competition-stability trade-off, which cannot be entirely eliminated through regulation, but can be mitigated.

Main Points

Historical Context

• Banking was traditionally highly regulated, with the belief that competition could undermine stability, especially after the Great Depression.
• Regulatory complacency with bank collusion and preference for concentrated markets was common until recently.
• Competition policy was not fully applied to the banking sector in many countries until the late 20th century.

Shift to Liberalization

• Deregulation in the 1980s and 1990s led to increased competition and market integration.
• Financial innovation and technological change transformed banking, making it more service-oriented and market-based.
• Competition led to market concentration, especially in the EU, while the US saw stabilization.

Competition and Stability Trade-off

• Two main channels through which competition may increase instability:
  • Runs/panics due to coordination problems among depositors/investors.
  • Excessive risk-taking and increased probability of failure.
• Empirical evidence suggests a positive association between market power and bank-level stability, but with country variation.
• Aggregate concentration has a mixed effect on stability, with larger banks often being more diversified but also more risky.
• Systemic risk can be influenced by competition for deposits, which may lead to contagion and multiple equilibria.

Regulatory Challenges

• Liberalization without adequate regulation led to the 2007–09 financial crisis.
• Regulation (prudential and conduct) can alleviate but not eliminate the competition-stability trade-off.
• Regulatory instruments must consider market friction and social cost of failure.
• Optimal regulation requires tougher capital requirements in more competitive markets.

Regulatory Response to the Crisis

• Basel II was found to be inadequate in controlling risk-taking and market discipline.
• Post-crisis reforms include:
  • Dodd-Frank Act (US) with a focus on consumer protection.
  • UK's ring fencing and twin peaks architecture.
  • EU's banking union and centralized supervision by the ECB.
• Regulatory instruments like capital requirements, liquidity ratios, and disclosure rules are essential but must be integrated with competition policy.

Coordination Between Regulation and Competition Policy

• Regulation and competition policy are not independent; they must be coordinated.
• Optimal regulation should consider the intensity of competition.
• Market concentration should be intermediate to balance stability and efficiency.
• Resolution mechanisms may lead to anticompetitive and Too Big To Fail (TBTF) structures.
• Prudential regulation may bar entry for smaller institutions, but this can increase welfare.

Financial Architecture

• Separate agencies for competition policy and prudential oversight are recommended to avoid conflicts of interest.
• Integration of consumer protection with competition policy may be beneficial, though it varies by region (e.g., UK vs. EU).

Key Cases and Examples

• HBOs-Lloyds merger (2008):
  • Approved despite concerns about market concentration.
  • Highlighted the TBTF dilemma and the role of state aid in influencing competition.
• Bear Stearns-Washington Mutual-JP Morgan, Merrill Lynch-Bank of America, Wachovia-Wells Fargo:
  • Showed how market power and TBTF can distort competition and lead to systemic risk.

Conclusion

• Competition is not the root cause of banking fragility, but it can exacerbate instability.
• Well-designed regulation can mitigate the trade-off but not eliminate it.
• Coordination between prudential regulation and competition policy is essential.
• Separation of regulatory authorities (prudential, competition, consumer protection) is recommended to improve efficiency and stability.
• Post-crisis era requires rethinking the role of competition policy in banking, with a focus on systemic stability and market discipline.

References

• Matutes, C. and X. Vives (2000), “Imperfect Competition, Risk Taking and Regulation in Banking”, European Economic Review, 44.
• Vives, X. (2006), “Banking and Regulation in Emerging Markets”, The World Bank Research Observer.
• Carletti, E. and X. Vives (2009), "Regulation and Competition Policy in Banking", Oxford University Press.
• Vives, X. (2011), “Competition Policy in Banking”, Oxford Review of Economic Policy.
• Vives, X. (2014), “Strategic Complementarity, Fragility, and Regulation”, Review of Financial Studies.
• Vives, X. (2014), "Will Basel III Work?", Voxeu.org.
• Vives, X. (2016), Competition and Stability in Banking: The Role of Regulation and Competition Policy, Princeton University Press (forthcoming).