EBA欧洲银行-Annex-to-EBA-Opinion-on-third-country-equivalence-Argentina_20页_464kb
报告摘要
Summary of the Banking Sector in the Republic of Argentina
A. Overview of the Banking Sector
Institutional and Legal Framework
- The Central Bank of Argentina (BCRA) serves as the financial regulator, supervisor, and resolution authority for financial institutions.
- The Charter of the BCRA (Law No. 24,144) and the Law on Financial Institutions (Law No. 21,526) define the mandates, jurisdictions, functions, and powers of the BCRA.
- The BCRA's Board of Directors has the authority to approve the opening of new financial institutions and their subsidiaries or branches.
- The Law on Financial Institutions mandates that all financial institutions, including local branches of foreign entities, must obtain a license from the BCRA before commencing operations.
- The BCRA issues specific rules for institutions based on their legal nature, size, and socioeconomic context, particularly for credit unions.
Structure and Performance of the Banking Sector
- The Argentine financial system is bank-based, with a relatively low depth.
- As of November 2017, the total assets of financial entities represented about 50% of GDP, with banks accounting for 30% of GDP.
- Private sector deposits accounted for 16% of GDP.
- There are 77 active financial entities under BCRA supervision, divided into:
- 13 state-owned banks: Represent 39% of total assets, 32% of total private sector loans, and 35% of private sector deposits.
- 33 domestic private banks: Account for 30% of total assets, 33% of private sector loans, and 32% of private sector deposits.
- 16 foreign private banks (7 branches, 9 subsidiaries): Manage 30% of total assets, 32% of private sector loans, and 33% of private sector deposits. Spanish investors hold over 50% of the assets of these foreign banks.
- 15 non-banking financial institutions (5 local, 9 foreign, 1 domestic credit union): Hold a small share of total assets and liabilities.
Solvency and Liquidity Ratios
- As of November 2017, the regulatory capital ratio of the financial system reached 16% of risk-weighted assets (RWAs), up from 2015.
- Common Equity Tier 1 (CET1) capital was 14.6% of RWAs.
- The Basel III leverage ratio for the largest domestic banks was 10.4% as of September 2017.
- The Liquidity Coverage Ratio (LCR) reached 2.0 by September 2017, well above the 0.8 requirement.
- The stock of liquid assets reached 41% of deposits as of November 2017, with BCRA bills and repos accounting for 39% and cash and cash equivalents for 61%.
Profitability
- High inflation levels have historically been a source of profitability for the financial system due to low-cost funds and high-yield assets.
- The return on assets of financial entities in January-November 2017 was 3%, a 0.7 percentage point decline year-over-year.
- A decline in inflation has contributed to a drop in margins for banks.
Systemic Risk
- Systemic risk is considered relatively small due to the size, low-complexity products, and limited interconnectedness among entities.
- D-SIBs (Domestic Systemically Important Banks) show relatively high solvency, and risk concentration is limited.
Non-Performing Loans (NPLs)
- NPLs to the private sector were 1.9% of total financing as of November 2017, which is below historical levels and many international economies.
Implementation of Basel III Standards
- Pillars 1 and 2 of the Basel III framework were introduced in 2013, and Pillar 3 in December 2013.
- Only the standardised approach has been implemented for credit, market, operational, and counterparty credit risk.
- Additional adjustments were introduced in July 2016 (e.g., equity investments in funds, SA-CCR, eligible ECAIs, and treatment of other comprehensive income).
- The capital conservation, D-SIB, and countercyclical buffers were implemented in 2016, with the CCyB set at 0% since April 2016.
- The LCR entered into force in January 2015, and the NSFR was published in August 2017 to take effect in January 2018.
- The revised Interest Rate Risk principles and securitisation framework took effect in July 2018 and March 2018, respectively.
- The BCRA applies its regulatory requirements to all financial institutions, including state-owned, domestic and foreign private, and non-bank entities.
B. Detailed Assessment of the Republic of Argentina
Topic I: Supervisory Framework
- The supervisory framework is assessed as "Largely Equivalent" to the EU framework.
- The BCRA is the central authority for prudential regulation and supervision, with SEFyC (Superintendentage of Financial and Exchange Institutions) performing supervisory duties.
- Supervisory powers include rating financial institutions, revoking licenses, approving recovery plans, and setting audit requirements.
- Fit and Proper regime is on par with EU standards, with a focus on the time commitment of management and supervisory bodies.
- Qualifying shareholder participations have similar requirements to the EU, with minimum 25% financial experience and restrictions on beneficial ownership in the gambling sector or reliance on public contracts.
- Professional secrecy is enforced through the Code of Ethics and Internal Rule No. 5160, with obligations extending to external auditors.
- International cooperation is facilitated through MoUs with EU and non-EU authorities, including the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS).
Topic II: Own Funds
- Own funds requirements are "Largely Equivalent" to the EU.
- The requirements include:
- 4.5% CET1
- 6% Tier 1 (T1)
- 8% Total Capital
- The treatment of CET1 is similar to the CRR, but non-capitalised shares are an additional component in Argentina, representing a negligible fraction (0.1%) of the financial system.
- Adjustments and deductions align with the CRR, though pension obligations are not considered as defined pension assets are not present in the jurisdiction.
Topic III: Credit Risk Requirements
- Credit risk, credit risk mitigation, and securitisation regulations are "Equivalent" to the EU framework.
- The standardised approach is the only method used, and it is implemented in a similar manner to the EU.
- Some differences exist in risk weights and qualitative aspects, but these are addressed through current practices.
- Credit risk mitigation is considered super-equivalent due to a narrower list of eligible instruments.
展开完整摘要
试读结束,高清完整版pdf/doc/ppt,请点下载