2015年-CEPS欧洲政策研究中心_Banking_Union_in_Three_Steps_2页_243kb

Banking Union in Three Steps Summary

Core Content

The document outlines a three-step approach to establishing a banking union within the Eurozone, emphasizing the urgent need for reform in the wake of the financial crisis. It argues that the current system, based on a cooperative model, is ineffective and that the EU must act swiftly to create a more integrated and stable banking framework.

Main Views

The author, Karel Lanno, suggests that the EU should move quickly to implement banking union reforms, which are essential for restoring market confidence and ensuring financial stability. He highlights the following three key steps:

1. Centralized Banking Supervision

   • The Eurozone authorities should transfer banking supervision to the European Central Bank (ECB) using Article 127.6 of the TFEU, which allows the Council of Finance Ministers to assign prudential supervision tasks to the ECB.
   • This would provide the ECB with direct access to information about individual banks, which is crucial for its liquidity-providing operations.
   • The current cooperative model, managed by the European Banking Authority (EBA), has failed, as evidenced by the Spanish bank bail-out.

2. Single Deposit Protection Fund

   • A unified deposit guarantee system is necessary to ensure depositor confidence across the Eurozone.
   • The current system is fragmented, with different statutes and funding mechanisms in each member state.
   • A pre-funded system should be established, possibly by taking a 1.25% contribution from eligible deposits in the EU, which could generate €100 billion today.
   • This fund could also serve as a resolution authority, similar to the role of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) in the US.

3. Unified Bank Resolution and Liquidation Scheme

   • A common framework for resolving and liquidating failing banks is essential.
   • The European Commission's June 6th proposal is a step in the right direction, including elements such as mandatory resolution plans, early intervention triggers, and tools like asset claims and bail-ins.
   • However, the proposal is a directive, not a regulation, which means it relies on member states to implement it, leading to potential delays and inconsistencies.
   • The author recommends using a leverage ratio instead of the Tier 1 ratio (from CRD IV) as a more effective trigger for early intervention, as it is less subject to manipulation due to risk weighting.

Key Information

• Document Title: Banking Union in Three Steps
• Author: Karel Lanno
• Date: 12 June 2012
• Institution: CEPS (Centre for European Policy Studies)
• Document Type: Commentary
• Main Argument: A banking union is critical for financial stability in the Eurozone, and the EU must act quickly to implement it.
• Proposed Solutions:
  • Transfer prudential supervision to the ECB using TFEU Article 127.6.
  • Create a single deposit protection fund with a pre-funded structure.
  • Establish a unified resolution and liquidation framework with a leverage ratio as the trigger for intervention.

Conclusion

The author stresses that the EU has lost valuable time in addressing the banking crisis and that the concept of a banking union must be fully realized and implemented rapidly. He warns against allowing the idea to become just another acronym of European integration without real substance. The proposed three-step approach aims to create a more resilient and integrated banking system across the Eurozone.