2016年-PIIE彼得森国际经济研究所_The_Case_for_Exchange_Rate_Flexibility_in_Oil_14页_512kb
报告摘要
Summary of "The Case for Exchange Rate Flexibility in Oil-Exporting Economies"
Core Content
This policy brief by Brad Setser argues that oil-exporting economies should adopt more flexible exchange rate regimes rather than maintaining dollar pegs or baskets. The central thesis is that pegging to the dollar or other currencies of oil-importing economies leads to macroeconomic imbalances and hinders the ability of these economies to adjust to oil price fluctuations.
Main Points
1. Oil Price Volatility and Economic Impact
- Oil-exporting economies have experienced significant economic booms due to high oil prices.
- These economies now require an oil price of around $40 a barrel to cover their import bills, but with oil prices above $90, they have substantial funds to invest globally.
- However, the need for exchange rate flexibility is critical for managing these fluctuations effectively.
2. Problems with Dollar Pegs
- Macroeconomic Procyclicality: Pegged exchange rates lead to procyclical policies. When oil prices rise, governments increase spending and investment, leading to inflation and negative real interest rates. When oil prices fall, they cut spending and face deflation and high real interest rates.
- Inflation and Deflation Pressures: Pegging to the dollar forces domestic price adjustments during oil price swings. This leads to slow and often painful inflationary or deflationary adjustments.
- Unstable Real Interest Rates: Real interest rates in pegged economies can swing widely, often leading to economic instability.
3. Dollar Pegs and Fiscal Policy
- The argument that pegging to the dollar is necessary to avoid mismatches between oil revenues (in dollars) and local currency spending is flawed.
- Oil price volatility, not the currency mismatch, is the main source of fiscal instability.
- A flexible exchange rate can help stabilize government revenues by adjusting the currency value in line with oil price changes.
4. Exchange Rate Flexibility and Global Adjustment
- Oil-exporting economies’ surpluses must be offset by deficits elsewhere. The current global imbalance is exacerbated by the dollar pegs of oil exporters.
- Flexible exchange rates would allow oil-exporting economies to adjust their currencies in response to oil price changes, reducing the need for large external deficits in the US.
- The current reliance on dollar pegs has led to an increase in US current account deficits and made global adjustment more difficult.
5. Alternatives to Dollar Pegs
- Managed Floats: Some oil-exporting economies, like Russia and Norway, use managed floats. These regimes allow for more natural adjustments to oil price changes.
- Oil-Indexed Pegs: Economies that peg to a basket including oil (e.g., Russia) can better align their currency value with oil price movements.
- Floating Currencies: Countries like Norway, which allow their currencies to float, have shown better economic resilience and more stable macroeconomic conditions.
Key Information
- Oil Exporting Economies are often pegged to the dollar or a basket of currencies, including the dollar and euro.
- Exchange Rate Flexibility would allow these economies to adjust more smoothly to oil price changes.
- Inflationary and Deflationary Pressures are intensified by fixed exchange rates.
- Real Interest Rates fluctuate dramatically in pegged economies, contributing to economic instability.
- Fiscal Policy is more important than exchange rate regimes in managing Dutch disease.
- Dollar Pegs do not help reduce oil revenue volatility and can lead to misallocation of resources.
- Global Imbalances are worsened by the fact that oil-exporting economies' currencies remain tied to the dollar.
- Flexible Exchange Rates could help reduce the US current account deficit and improve global economic adjustment.
Table of Major Oil-Exporting Economies
| Country | Oil and Gas Export Revenues (2006) | Avg. Oil Exports (2006) | Population (millions) | Exchange Rate Regime | REER Change (2001–2006) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Saudi Arabia | $195.6 billion | 8.8 million barrels/day | 21.4 | Fixed (to dollar) | -22.2% |
| Russia | $190.8 billion | 7.4 million barrels/day | 142.9 | Managed float (euro-dollar basket) | 39.6% |
| Norway | $75.7 billion | 2.3 million barrels/day | 4.6 | Floating | 6.2% |
| United Arab Emirates | $70.2 billion | 2.2 million barrels/day | 2.6 | Fixed (to dollar) | -18.9% |
| Venezuela | $60.3 billion | 2.4 million barrels/day | 25.7 | Fixed | -25.6% |
| Iran | $60.1 billion | 2.4 million barrels/day | 68.7 | Managed float | 22.3% |
| Kuwait | $55.9 billion | 2.3 million barrels/day | 2.4 | Fixed (to basket) | n.a. |
| Algeria | $53.3 billion | 1.7 million barrels/day | 32.9 | Managed float (to dollar) | -22.0% |
| Nigeria | $48.5 billion | 1.9 million barrels/day | 131.9 | Managed float (plans to float 2009) | 12.8% |
| Libya | $38.3 billion | 1.3 million barrels/day | 5.7 | Fixed (to SDR) | n.a. |
| Kazakhstan | $24.6 billion | 1.5 million barrels/day | 15.2 | Managed float | n.a. |
| Qatar | $21.9 billion | 1.0 million barrels/day | 0.9 | Fixed (to dollar) | n.a. |
| Oman | $16.4 billion | 0.7 million barrels/day | 3.1 | Fixed (to dollar) | -18.4% |
| Bahrain | $9.4 billion | 0.0 million barrels/day | 0.7 | Fixed (to dollar) | -25.4% |
Conclusion
Oil-exporting economies benefit more from exchange rate flexibility than from pegging to the dollar. Flexible regimes allow for smoother macroeconomic adjustments, reduce inflationary and deflationary pressures, and help manage global imbalances. The US and other oil-importing economies may benefit from the global demand for dollar assets, but the risks of relying on this system are growing. The time has come for oil-exporting economies to move toward more flexible exchange rate policies.
试读结束,高清完整版pdf/doc/ppt,请点下载