中美碳中和地区性进展跟踪(英)-63页_8mb
报告摘要
U.S.-China Climate Institute Report Summary
-
Authors: Fredrich Kahrl*, Jessica Gordon*, Fan Dai*, Jie Han, with affiliations from UC Berkeley.
-
Institute: Focuses on joint U.S.-China climate initiatives, launched in 2019, involving policymakers and experts to foster cooperation and climate solutions.
Indicators and Milestones Development
-
Aims to balance simplicity and completeness for tracking progress toward carbon neutrality (U.S.
by 2050, China by 2060). -
Dual-Harmonized indicators tracking:
- Flow indicators (e.g., new infrastructure adoption, e.g., EV sales).
- Stock indicators (e.g., total energy mix shifts, e.g., non-fossil electricity share).
-
2035 Milestones define national benchmarks for key sectors (electricity, buildings,
industry, transport, forestry, energy intensity, CO₂ intensity).
Key Findings
-
Electricity: Significant growth in non-fossil (wind, solar) generation capacity. U.S. share
(new capacity) >79% (2019-2021 avg), rising to >90% by 2035. China similar trend, from 33%
to 67%. Stock share (total generation) increases from 30–40% to >55–95%. -
Buildings: Non-fossil energy share in final consumption increases from ~50–60% to 70–75%.
Focus on electrification (esp. heating pumps in U.S., district heating in China). -
Industry: Share of non-fossil energy doubles (22–40% → 32–45%).
-
Transportation: ZEV sales share rising (8–22% → >80% in U.S.), and in freight (1% →
60%). Non-fossil energy share ~5% → 20%. -
Forestry: Optimistic but cautious milestones. U.S. forest area grows by 2.2 pp (to 34.2%) and
volume by ~1 m³/ha-yr. China adds 3 pp forest area (to 23%) and ~1.5 m³/ha-yr volume. -
Energy & CO₂ Intensity: Declines needed: U.S. energy intensity falls 43% (basis 2000), CO₂
intensity drops 70% (relative to 2020). China matches energy intensity decline but CO₂ drops
60%.
Policy Implications
-
Data Gaps: Notable limitations in state-level data (especially flow indicators). Calls for
national policy to standardize data collection. -
Convergence: U.S. progress steady but slow per state, China shows regional diversity.
-
Recommendations:
Global cooperation on cross-border challenges (e.g., renewable access, emissions R&D).
Subnational regions need tailored support to meet milestones. Strengthened bilateral dialogue
based on shared scientific and policy frameworks.
Table: List of key 2035 milestones by sector (simplified from Table 2)
| Sector | U.S. Milestone | China Milestone | Notable Exclusions/Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Electricity | >95% | >55% | New capacity share >90% |
| Buildings | 70% (final energy) | 75% | Mixed tech challenges |
| Industry | 45% | 45% | Variable state achievement |
| Transportation | ~20% (non-fossil) | 20% | High EV adoption dependency |
| Forest Area | +2.2 pp | +3 pp | Each depends on prior trends |
| Energy Intensity | 43% ↓ (from 2020) | 43% ↓ (from 2020) | US/China linear trajectories differed pre-2020 |
| CO₂ Intensity | 70% ↓ (energy basis) | 60% ↓ | China milestone less ambitious |
- Key recommendations emphasize data harmonization, policy tracking, and targeted subnational support for accelerated progress toward mid-century climate neutrality goals.
试读结束,高清完整版pdf/doc/ppt,请点下载