EBA欧洲银行-EBA-GL-2017-12-CT-GLs-Consolidated-Joint-ESMA-EBA-on-assessment-of-the-s..._23页_421kb
报告摘要
Summary of Joint ESMA and EBA Guidelines Compliance Table
Overview
This document outlines the compliance status of various competent authorities across the European Union with the Joint ESMA and EBA Guidelines on the assessment of the suitability of members of the management body and key function holders under Directive 2013/36/EU (CRD IV) and Directive 2014/65/EU (MiFID II). The guidelines were issued on 26 September 2017 and became applicable on 30 June 2018.
Core Content
The guidelines aim to ensure that individuals holding positions in the management bodies or as key function holders (KFH) of financial institutions meet certain suitability criteria, including:
- Independence of directors and KFH
- Suitability assessment procedures
- Requirements for directorships and diversity
- Conflicts of interest management
Main Compliance Status
| Member State | Competent Authority | Compliance Status | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Belgium | National Bank of Belgium | No | Follows the guidelines as good practice, not as formal requirements |
| Bulgaria | Bulgarian National Bank | Intends to comply | By 01.01.2019 |
| Bulgaria | Financial Supervision Commission (FSC) | Intends to comply | By 1.11.2018 |
| Czech Republic | Czech National Bank (CNB) | Intends to comply | By 30.06.2018 |
| Czech Republic | CNB (ESMA) | Yes | As at 30.06.2018 |
| Denmark | Finanstilsynet | Intends to comply | By 31.12.2018 |
| Germany | Bundesanstalt für Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht (BaFin) | No | Excludes formal independence and KFH suitability |
| Germany | BaFin (ESMA) | No | Excludes formal independence and KFH suitability |
| Estonia | Finantsinspektsion | Yes | As at 21.05.2018 |
| Ireland | Central Bank of Ireland | Intends to comply | By 30.06.2018 |
| Ireland | Central Bank of Ireland (ESMA) | Yes | As at 27.08.2018 |
| Greece | Bank of Greece | Intends to comply | By end of 2018 |
| Greece | Hellenic Capital Market Commission (HCMC) | Yes | As at 23.05.2018 |
| Croatia | Hrvatska narodna banka | No | Excludes KFH suitability |
| Croatia | HANFA (ESMA) | Yes | As at 16.05.2018 |
| Spain | Banco de España | No | Excludes Guideline 91 and 186 |
| Spain | CNMV (ESMA) | Intends to comply | By end 2018 |
| Cyprus | Central Bank of Cyprus | Intends to comply | By 31.12.2018 |
| Cyprus | CySEC (ESMA) | Intends to comply | By 1 January 2019 |
| Latvia | FCMC | No | Partial compliance due to small banking sector |
| Lithuania | Bank of Lithuania | No | Excludes KFH suitability assessment by competent authority |
| Luxembourg | CSSF | Intends to comply | By end of 2018 |
| Hungary | MNB (EBA) | Intends to comply | By 30.06.2018 |
| Hungary | MNB (ESMA) | Intends to comply | By 31.12.2018 |
| Malta | MFSA | Intends to comply | By application date |
| Malta | MFSA (ESMA) | Yes | As at 23.06.2018 |
| Netherlands | De Nederlandsche Bank | Intends to comply | By end of 2018 |
| Netherlands | AFM (ESMA) | Yes | As at 23.05.2018 |
| Austria | FMA | Intends to comply | By 01.07.2018 |
| Austria | FMA (ESMA) | Yes | As at 16.05.2018 |
| Poland | KNF | Intends to comply | By end of 2018 |
| Poland | KNF (ESMA) | Yes | As at 23.06.2018 |
| Portugal | Banco de Portugal | Intends to comply | By end of 2018 |
Key Points and Exceptions
- Non-compliance is generally due to legal incompatibility or lack of adequate legal basis for certain provisions.
- Partial compliance is often due to national laws that differ from the guidelines, either in scope or interpretation.
- Good practice is applied in cases where national laws do not align with the guidelines, such as in Belgium and Latvia.
- Formal independence and competent authority's suitability assessment of KFH are commonly excluded or not fully implemented.
- Compliance timelines vary, with many competent authorities aiming to comply by 30 June 2018 or end of 2018.
- Legislative proceedings are ongoing in several countries, including Czech Republic, Poland, and Spain, to align national laws with the guidelines.
Conclusion
The Joint ESMA and EBA Guidelines are being implemented by most competent authorities across the EU, either fully or partially. While some countries, such as Belgium, Latvia, and Germany, have partial or non-compliance due to legal or practical reasons, others, like Ireland, Cyprus, and Malta, have either fully complied or intend to comply by the application date. The process involves legal adaptations, regulatory updates, and supervisory adjustments to align with the guidelines.
试读结束,高清完整版pdf/doc/ppt,请点下载