2024-12-16-世界银行-跟上步伐_通货膨胀如何侵蚀现金转移以及如何应对（英）_83页_2mb

Summary of Cash Transfer Indexation and Inflation Report

Introduction and Key Findings

• Focus: The report examines the practice of adjusting cash transfer programs to maintain purchasing power during inflation. Indexing is presented as an essential element of adaptive social protection systems.
• Data: A comprehensive global database (232 non-contributory cash transfer programs across 158 countries) shows indexation is prevalent yet often discretionary. Approximately 80% of programs adjust benefits, 32% automatically.
• Observation: Countries actively adapt indexation over time. Most automatic indexations are based on prices (especially national CPIs), with frequency typically being annual.

Method and Benchmarks for Adjustment

• Benchmarks Commonly Used: Prices (Consumer Price Index - CPI variants are most common) and Wages (average earnings or statutory minimum wages). A third use combinations thereof or macro-economic variables.
• Frequency: Most automatic adjustments occur annually. Higher frequencies are used in high-inflation settings (semi-annual, quarterly, monthly), while some programs adjust less frequently or based on threshold breaches.

Country Case Highlights and Evolution

• Argentina (AUH, PBPAM): Evolved towards automatic, multi-component adjustment but still struggles to keep pace with inflation.
• Australia (Age Pension): Successfully transitioned to automatic, complex indexation (dual mechanism based on pensioner vs general CPI).
• Ghana (LEAP): In-transition to automatic indexation, focusing on affordable large-scale adjustments.
• Maldives (Old Age Basic Pension): Example of shifting from automatic to more discretionary control.
• Mexico (PBPAM): Discretionary adjustments replacing the initial automatic mechanism.

Impacts on Fiscal Space and Human Capital

• Fiscal Considerations: Indexation adds cost, but simulation exercises suggest it's often affordable (as % of GDP). Fiscal inaction can be costly in terms of forgone economic impact (estimated ~$1.4 multiplier per $1 cut) and human capital loss.
• Political Economy: Discretionary indexation offers more budget control but is riskier and less transparent than automatic indexation, reducing political sensitivity but increasing predictability and targeting for beneficiaries.

Indexation as Adaptive Social Protection

• Integration: Automatic indexation aids coherence with other social insurance and wage-setting institutions.
• Operational Agendas: Future work involves tailoring mechanisms (price vs wage), choosing frequencies, selecting appropriate benchmark components, and evolving indexation rules over time.

Framework for Choosing Indexation Type

• Considerations: Level of inflation and degree of "maturity" of the adaptive social protection system (data, programs, institutions, financing) are crucial.
• Recommendations: Lower inflation, low maturity: start with basic automatic indexation. Moderate-low inflation, moderate maturity: embrace automatic indexing broadly. High inflation, low maturity: be cautious and plan for potential spending pressure. High inflation, high maturity: likely institutionally set for automatic/indexed components, potentially requiring redesign.

In essence, the report advocates for the systematic use of automatic indexation to enhance social protection systems' responsiveness to economic shocks like inflation, while acknowledging the trade-offs in complexity and fiscal cost.