2014年-世界发展银行全球_The_Hydropower_Sustainability_Assessment_Protocol_for_Use_by_World_Bank_Clients___Lessons_Learned_and_Recommendations_46页_1mb

Water Papers: Hydropower Sustainability Assessment Protocol Summary

Core Content

The Hydropower Sustainability Assessment Protocol (HSAP) is a framework designed to evaluate the sustainability of hydropower projects using a consistent, globally applicable methodology. It aims to improve the environmental, social, and technical aspects of hydropower development and enhance public acceptance of hydropower projects.

Main Topics and Structure

The Protocol is organized around four stages of the hydropower project cycle:

• Early Stage
• Preparation
• Implementation (including construction)
• Operation

Each stage includes assessment manuals that cover a range of sustainability topics, including:

• Technical: Siting and Design, Hydrological Resource, Reservoir Planning / Preparation and Filling / Management, Infrastructure Safety, Asset reliability and efficiency
• Environmental: Downstream Flow Regimes, Erosion and Sedimentation, Water Quality, Waste, Noise, and Air Quality, Biodiversity and Invasive Species
• Social: Project-Affected Communities and Livelihoods, Cultural Heritage, Indigenous Peoples, Resettlement, Public Health, Labor and Working Conditions
• Economic and Financial: Economic Viability, Financial Viability, Project Benefits, Procurement
• Integrative: Demonstrated Need and Strategic Fit, Communications and Consultation, Governance, Environmental and Social Impact Assessment and Management, Integrated Project Management

Key Features

• Not a certification scheme, but an auditing tool to measure sustainability performance.
• No pass or fail result, but provides a status baseline and a benchmarking mechanism.
• Managed by the Hydropower Sustainability Assessment Council, which includes seven sectoral chambers and a secretariat (currently the International Hydropower Association).
• Accredited Assessors conduct assessments, with training being essential to ensure quality and consistency.

World Bank's Role and Integration

• The World Bank supports the Protocol as a complementary tool to its own policies and procedures, rather than a replacement.
• It aligns with the Environmental and Social Safeguards and Performance Standards of the World Bank.
• The Protocol can be used to support project preparation, implementation, and operation, as well as capacity building and stakeholder engagement.

Lessons Learned and Recommendations

Lessons Learned

1. Training and Client Buy-in are essential for successful Protocol use.
2. Resource Requirements are significant, particularly in terms of time and expertise.
3. Project Cycle and Timing of the assessment are important for effective application.
4. Document Management is a critical component of the process.
5. Accredited Assessors with prior experience ensure quality and consistency.
6. Complementarity with World Bank Policies is a key strength, enhancing the value of the Protocol in the World Bank's context.

Recommendations

1. For Public Sector Clients:

   • Encourage the use of the Protocol to improve project performance and public acceptance.
   • Promote its application in the project cycle, especially during early preparation.

2. For World Bank Use:

   • Develop specific guidance for using the Protocol with private sector clients.
   • Consider the Protocol as a comprehensive reference document during country strategy frameworks and project preparation.
   • Explore its use as a performance monitoring tool to complement project supervision.

3. For Governance:

   • Enhance the financial sustainability of the Protocol through a clear operating model.
   • Expand training modules on sustainable hydropower principles.
   • Ensure diverse applicability to meet varying developer needs.
   • Increase awareness and uptake in low- and middle-income countries.

Challenges and Considerations

• The Protocol was primarily developed in developed countries, so its applicability in developing countries may require adjustment and context-specific adaptation.
• Client ownership and developer commitment are crucial for the success of an assessment.
• Addressing identified gaps requires follow-up actions and additional support in the form of advisory services or technical assistance.
• Complex manuals and site-specific challenges highlight the need for capacity building and training programs tailored to the target country.

Conclusion

The Hydropower Sustainability Assessment Protocol is a valuable tool for promoting sustainable hydropower development. It provides a consistent framework for assessing projects across technical, environmental, social, economic, and governance dimensions. While it is still in its adolescent phase of global rollout, it has the potential to enhance the World Bank's sector engagement and project management. With proper training, support, and adaptation, the Protocol can be effectively integrated into the World Bank's project cycle and client engagement strategies.