EBA欧洲银行-EBA-GL-2014-05-Compliance-Table-Guidelines-on-Significant-Credit-Risk-Transfer_6页_229kb
报告摘要
EBA/GL/2014/05 Compliance Summary
Core Content
The document provides a compliance table detailing the status of adherence by competent authorities from various European countries to the EBA Guidelines – EBA/GL/2014/05 on Guidelines on Significant Credit Risk Transfer, which were published on 7th July 2014 and updated on 9th October 2015.
Compliance Status by Member State
| Member State | Competent Authority | Compliance Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| Belgium | National Bank of Belgium | Yes | |
| Bulgaria | Bulgarian National Bank | Yes | |
| Czech Republic | Czech National Bank | Yes | |
| Denmark | Danish Financial Supervisory Authority | Yes | |
| Germany | Federal Financial Supervisory Authority | Yes | |
| Estonia | Financial Supervision Authority | Yes | |
| Ireland | Central Bank of Ireland | Yes | |
| Greece | Bank of Greece | Yes | |
| Croatia | National Bank of Croatia | No | Credit institutions in Croatia are not involved in securitisation transactions so far. |
| Spain | Bank of Spain | Yes | |
| France | Prudential Supervisory & Resolution Authority | Yes | |
| Italy | Bank of Italy | Yes | |
| Cyprus | Central Bank of Cyprus | Yes | |
| Latvia | Financial and Capital Market Commission | Yes | |
| Lithuania | Bank of Lithuania | Yes | |
| Luxembourg | Commission for the Supervision of Financial Sector | Yes | |
| Hungary | National Bank of Hungary | Yes | |
| Malta | Malta Financial Services Authority | Yes | Updated – 09.10.2015 |
| Netherlands | National Bank of Netherlands | Yes | |
| Austria | Financial Market Authority | Yes | |
| Poland | Polish Financial Supervision Authority | Yes | Within the current legal framework in relation to investment firms |
| Portugal | Bank of Portugal | Yes | |
| Romania | National Bank of Romania | Yes | |
| Slovenia | Bank of Slovenia | Yes | |
| Slovakia | National Bank of Slovakia | No response | The CA failed to provide the notification of compliance |
| Finland | Finnish Financial Supervisory Authority | Yes | |
| Sweden | Swedish Financial Supervisory Authority | Yes | |
| United Kingdom | Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) | Yes | |
| United Kingdom | Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) | Yes | |
| United Kingdom | Financial Services Commission (Gibraltar) | Yes | |
| Iceland | Icelandic Financial Supervisory Authority (FME) | Partial | Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010 is yet to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. Until then, the FME is not legally obligated to comply. |
| Liechtenstein | Financial Market Authority (FMA) | Yes | Currently, there exists no legal act concerning securitisation for credit institutions in Liechtenstein. |
| Norway | Norwegian Financial Supervisory Authority | Yes | Response dated 08/07/2015 |
Main Points and Key Information
- Guidelines Overview: The EBA Guidelines (EBA/GL/2014/05) focus on Significant Credit Risk Transfer and aim to ensure consistency and clarity in the application of regulatory requirements across the European Union.
- Compliance Requirement: Article 16(3) of the EBA Regulation mandates that national competent authorities must inform the EBA whether they comply or intend to comply with the guidelines. If they do not, they must provide reasons.
- Compliance Status:
- Most competent authorities from the EU and EEA-EFTA states comply or intend to comply with the guidelines.
- Croatia and Slovakia are exceptions: Croatia does not comply due to a lack of securitisation activity, while Slovakia has not provided a response.
- Iceland has a partial compliance status due to constitutional constraints preventing the implementation of EBA regulations.
- Legal Context: The compliance of competent authorities is based on their national legal frameworks and the extent to which they have implemented EU regulations, such as the CRD IV/CRR legislation.
- Responsibility: The EBA does not take responsibility for the accuracy of the information provided by competent authorities and advises users to contact the relevant authority for further details.
Conclusion
The compliance table highlights that the majority of competent authorities across the EU and EEA-EFTA states have either complied or intend to comply with the EBA Guidelines on Significant Credit Risk Transfer. However, some countries, such as Croatia, Iceland, and Slovakia, have specific challenges or have not yet provided a response. The EBA emphasizes that the information is provided by the competent authorities and encourages direct communication for the most up-to-date and accurate information.
试读结束,高清完整版pdf/doc/ppt,请点下载