2016年-世界发展银行全球_FY16_Brazil_Country_Opinion_Survey_Report_120页_3mb

FY16 Brazil Country Opinion Survey Report Summary

Core Content

This report presents the findings of the FY16 Brazil Country Opinion Survey conducted by the World Bank Group's Public Opinion Research Group (PORG). The survey aimed to understand stakeholders' perceptions of the WBG's role, effectiveness, and impact in Brazil.

Main Objectives

• To assess how stakeholders in Brazil perceive the WBG.
• To explore general issues facing Brazil.
• To evaluate the WBG's overall effectiveness and results.
• To analyze the WBG's knowledge work and instruments.
• To examine the future role of the WBG in Brazil.
• To assess communication and outreach efforts.

Methodology

• Conducted from March to April 2016.
• 561 stakeholders were invited to participate.
• 248 stakeholders responded, resulting in a 44% response rate.
• Participants were drawn from various sectors including government offices, local government, PMUs, consultants, NGOs, academia, media, and more.
• Questionnaires were completed online.
• Data was weighted for comparative analysis with the FY13 survey.
• The report includes aggregated responses for the WBG's annual Corporate Scorecard.

Key Findings

Demographics of the Sample

• Stakeholder categories were combined for analysis due to small sample sizes:
  • Ministerial and Presidential offices were grouped.
  • Civil Society included NGOs and youth groups.
  • Other stakeholders included media, judiciary, and independent institutions.
• Respondents from Other Areas and Center-West Brazil gave higher ratings for WBG effectiveness compared to those from Southeast Brazil.
• Collaboration with the WBG correlated with higher familiarity and effectiveness ratings.

General Issues Facing Brazil

• Direction of Brazil: Respondents in FY16 were less likely to believe Brazil was headed in the right direction compared to FY13.
• Development Priorities: Education was the most cited priority (67%), followed by public sector governance (52%) and health (35%).
• Poverty Reduction: Education was seen as the most effective factor (68%), followed by economic growth (37%) and equality of opportunity (29%).
• Shared Prosperity: Education and training for job opportunities were most associated with shared prosperity (57%), followed by economic growth (32%) and better public services (22%).
• Income Inequality: A significant majority perceived the gap between the rich and poor as a very big problem.
• Climate Change: Global climate change was considered a very serious problem by most respondents.

Overall Attitudes Toward the World Bank Group

• Effectiveness: FY16 respondents rated the WBG's overall effectiveness higher than FY13 (7.2 vs. 6.2).
• Collaboration: Collaborators gave significantly higher effectiveness ratings (7.4) than non-collaborators (6.6).
• Value of WBG: Financial resources for policy-based lending and investment lending were most valued.
• Weaknesses: Lack of public disclosure and influence by developed countries were the most cited weaknesses.
• Familiarity: FY16 respondents were more familiar with the WBG than FY13 (6.5 vs. 5.8).

Sectoral Importance and Effectiveness

• Importance: Education, environmental sustainability, and public sector governance were seen as the most important areas for WBG involvement.
• Effectiveness: The WBG was rated most effective in education, environmental sustainability, and social protection.
• Key Drivers of Effectiveness: These areas were strongly correlated with overall effectiveness and development results.
• Collaboration Differences: Collaborators rated the WBG more highly in areas like anti-corruption and welfare of vulnerable populations.

How the World Bank Group Operates

• Relevance and Alignment: PMUs/Consultants and local government gave the highest agreement that the WBG plays a relevant role and aligns with development priorities.
• Decision-Making: Respondents from Other Areas believed the WBG makes quick decisions and uses country systems appropriately.
• Effectiveness as a Partner: PMUs/Consultants and local government rated the WBG as the most effective development partner.
• Reimbursable Advisory Services (RAS): Both FY16 and FY13 showed similar levels of agreement that Brazil received value for money from RAS (6.6 and 6.2, respectively).

Knowledge and Instruments

• Usage of Knowledge Work: PMUs/Consultants used WBG knowledge work most frequently (57% weekly/monthly), while Parliamentarians used it less often (40% rarely).
• Meeting Knowledge Needs: The survey included an indicator question on this topic, but the full results were not included in the provided text.

Conclusion

The survey highlights a generally positive perception of the WBG among stakeholders in Brazil, with notable differences based on stakeholder type and geographic location. Collaboration with the WBG is a strong indicator of higher effectiveness and familiarity. The WBG is seen as playing a relevant role in development, with education, environmental sustainability, and public sector governance being key areas of importance and effectiveness. However, there are concerns about transparency and influence from developed countries. The report underscores the need for continued engagement and communication to address these concerns and enhance the WBG's impact.