2015年-世界发展银行全球_FY15_Indonesia_Country_Opinion_Survey_Report_160页_2mb

FY15 Indonesia Country Opinion Survey Report Summary

Core Content

This report presents the findings of the FY15 Indonesia Country Opinion Survey conducted by the World Bank Group's Public Opinion Research Group (PORG). The survey aimed to understand stakeholder perceptions of the WBG's work in Indonesia, including its effectiveness, relevance, and future role.

Main Objectives

• To assess how stakeholders in Indonesia perceive the World Bank Group.
• To evaluate the WBG's effectiveness and results.
• To explore the importance and impact of the WBG's knowledge work and activities.
• To examine the WBG's role in poverty reduction and development outcomes.
• To identify the most significant challenges and weaknesses in the WBG's operations.
• To gather insights on the WBG's future direction and collaboration opportunities.

Methodology

• The survey was conducted from March to May 2015.
• A total of 1089 stakeholders were invited, with 316 participating (29% response rate).
• Participants were drawn from various sectors, including government, private sector, NGOs, academia, and media.
• The survey included both open-ended and closed-ended questions.
• Results were compared with those from the FY12 survey, with data weighted to ensure comparable stakeholder composition.
• Indicator questions were used for the World Bank Group's annual Corporate Scorecard.

Demographics of the Sample

• Respondents were categorized into different stakeholder groups.
• The majority were from government ministries and departments, consultants, and PMUs.
• NGOs, private foundations, and trade unions were grouped under "CSO."
• Fewer respondents were from the judiciary, faith-based groups, and youth organizations.
• The sample included 161 respondents for FY15 and 265 for FY12.

General Issues Facing Indonesia

• Stakeholders were more positive about Indonesia's direction in FY15 than in FY12.
• The most important development priorities identified were "bureaucratic reform and governance" and "education."
• The top contributors to poverty reduction were "education" and "rural development."
• "Shared Prosperity" was seen as achievable through "urban development" and "equality of opportunity."

Overall Attitudes toward the World Bank Group

• The WBG was generally perceived as effective, with a mean effectiveness rating of 6.3.
• Respondents who collaborated with the WBG had higher ratings (6.8) than non-collaborators (6.2).
• The greatest values of the WBG were seen as "financial resources" and "technical assistance."
• The main weaknesses were "imposing technocratic solutions without regard to political realities" and "too influenced by developed countries."
• The most effective instruments for poverty reduction were "capacity development" and "investment lending."
• The WBG's capacity building work was rated highly on both importance and effectiveness.

Sectoral Importance and Effectiveness

• The WBG's effectiveness in specific areas like urban development and equality of opportunity significantly influenced overall perceptions of effectiveness.
• The WBG's work was seen as more effective in FY15 compared to FY12.
• The WBG's role in promoting private public partnerships was rated at 6.5 on a 10-point scale.
• The WBG's ability to help the poorest was rated as "to a somewhat sufficient degree" by 43% of respondents, with 5% rating it as "to a fully sufficient degree."

How the World Bank Group Operates

• The WBG was perceived as more effective in FY15, particularly in terms of "disbursing funds promptly."
• The WBG was seen as a more effective development partner in FY15, with higher ratings on several key qualities.
• The WBG's internal measuring and monitoring was rated at 6.4 on a 10-point scale.

Knowledge and Instruments

• The WBG's knowledge work was consulted by 74% of respondents.
• There was a significant increase in agreement that the WBG meets Indonesia's knowledge needs in FY15.
• The technical quality of the WBG's knowledge work was rated highly.
• The WBG's knowledge work was seen as adequately disseminated but not sufficiently translated into local languages.
• The WBG's financial instruments were rated as meeting Indonesia's needs, with a mean level of agreement of 7.3.

Future Role of the World Bank Group in Indonesia

• Stakeholders suggested the WBG should focus more on "poverty alleviation," "bureaucratic reform and governance," and "education."
• The WBG should offer more "reimbursable advisory services (RAS)" and increase "capacity development."
• Collaboration with "local governments" and "academia/think tanks/research institutes" was recommended for better development outcomes.

Communication and Outreach

• The primary sources of information for economic and social development issues were "local newspapers" and "the Internet."
• Stakeholders preferred information from "local newspapers" and "the Internet" over other sources.
• For future outreach, the WBG should enhance communication with key constituencies, including local governments, media, and academic institutions.

Key Information

• The survey involved 316 stakeholders in FY15 and 265 in FY12.
• The WBG's effectiveness is strongly correlated with its performance in specific areas such as urban development and equality of opportunity.
• The WBG is seen as an effective development partner, especially by those who collaborate with it.
• There is a need for improved communication and translation of knowledge work into local languages.
• The WBG should focus on poverty alleviation and enhance its advisory services and collaboration with local entities.