2015年-世界发展银行全球_FY15_Angola_Country_Opinion_Survey_Report_116页_1mb

报告摘要

FY15 Angola Country Opinion Survey Report Summary

Core Content Overview

The FY15 Angola Country Opinion Survey Report, conducted by the World Bank Group's Public Opinion Research Group (PORG), aims to assess how stakeholders in Angola perceive the WBG's work. The survey gathered opinions from 91 stakeholders across various sectors, yielding a 24% response rate. It compares these findings to those from the FY12 survey, with data weighted to ensure comparable stakeholder composition between the two years.

Main Objectives

To understand stakeholders' perceptions of the WBG's work in Angola.
To evaluate the WBG's effectiveness and results.
To identify the WBG's greatest strengths and weaknesses.
To assess the importance and effectiveness of the WBG's sectoral support.
To explore the WBG's operational practices and communication strategies.
To determine the future role and potential areas of collaboration for the WBG in Angola.

Methodology

Conducted from May to July 2015.
Invited 386 stakeholders, including representatives from government, private sector, civil society, and international agencies.
Only 91 stakeholders participated (24% response rate).
Data was weighted to ensure stakeholder composition consistency with FY12.
The survey included both open-ended and multiple-choice questions.
Indicator questions were used for the WBG's annual Corporate Scorecard.

Demographics of the Sample

Respondents were grouped into categories: ministries/PMUs, consultants, CSO (civil society organizations), and "Other".
No respondents from the Office of the President/Prime Minister, trade unions, faith-based groups, or the judiciary branch were included.
The survey asked respondents to identify their primary specialization and geographic location.
The majority of respondents were from the financial sector and private sector organizations, while fewer were from CSO and "Other" groups.

General Issues Facing Angola

The most important development priorities identified by respondents were "education" (62%), "poverty reduction" (33%), and "health" (21%).
The greatest contributors to poverty reduction were "education" (49%), "water and sanitation" (30%), and "agricultural development" (29%).
The WBG's "Shared Prosperity" goal was perceived as focusing on economic growth and equity, with respondents indicating that it would be achieved through improved access to education, water and sanitation, and health.

Overall Attitudes Toward the World Bank Group

Respondents' familiarity with the WBG was statistically similar to FY12, with a weighted mean of 4.5 in FY15 and 5.0 in FY12.
Familiarity was strongly correlated with overall effectiveness ratings and moderately with the perception of the WBG's relevance in development.
The WBG's greatest weaknesses were identified as "not enough public disclosure of its work" (38%) and "too bureaucratic in its operational policies and procedures" (37%).
Stakeholders from CSO, consultants, and ministries/PMUs were more likely to attribute failed reforms to lack of civil society participation.
The WBG's effectiveness was most closely associated with its work in education, water and sanitation, and health.

Sectoral Importance and Effectiveness

The WBG's support in education, water and sanitation, and health was perceived as the most important and effective.
The WBG's effectiveness in achieving development results was most strongly linked to its work in agriculture and rural development, water and sanitation, and education.
Stakeholders were asked to rate the WBG's effectiveness in promoting private public partnerships and helping the poorest in Angola.

How the World Bank Group Operates

Respondents in FY15 gave significantly higher ratings for the WBG's effectiveness in monitoring and evaluating projects, but lower ratings for prompt fund disbursement compared to FY12.
The WBG was perceived as an effective development partner in areas like technical assistance, policy advice, and knowledge sharing.
Collaboration with the WBG was rated higher in FY15 than in FY12, particularly with stakeholders who had direct engagement with the WBG.

World Bank Group's Knowledge and Instruments

The WBG's knowledge work and activities were rated higher in terms of technical quality in FY15 than in FY12.
Respondents believed the WBG's knowledge services, such as research and technical assistance, were important for development results.
The WBG was seen as meeting Angola's needs for financial instruments, though there was a call for greater focus on certain areas and more selective support.

Future Role of the World Bank Group in Angola

Respondents suggested the WBG should focus more on education, poverty reduction, and health.
There was a call for the WBG to offer more of its services, particularly in technical assistance, capacity development, and knowledge sharing.
Stakeholders recommended increased collaboration with NGOs, the private sector, and academia/research institutes.
To increase its value, the WBG was advised to provide more adequate data and reduce the complexity of obtaining financing.

Communication and Outreach

The primary sources of information about Angola's development were "local newspapers" and "the Internet".
Preferred information sources from the WBG included its website, seminars/workshops, and e-Newsletters.
Respondents were asked about their awareness of the WBG's Access to Information Policy, indicating that they were generally aware of it.

Key Findings

The WBG's effectiveness is closely tied to its performance in education, water and sanitation, and health.
There is a need for greater transparency and less bureaucracy in WBG operations.
Collaboration with civil society and the private sector is seen as crucial for better development outcomes.
The WBG should prioritize education, poverty reduction, and health in its future efforts.
Improved communication and information sharing, especially through digital channels, are recommended to enhance stakeholder engagement.

展开完整摘要