2007年-IMF国际货币组织全球_Key_Trends_in_Implementation_of_the_Fund39s_Transparency_Policy_8页_195kb

Summary of Key Trends in Implementation of the Fund's Transparency Policy

Core Content

This report provides an analysis of the implementation trends of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) Transparency Policy, focusing on publication rates, publication lags, and the use of deletions in various reports. It outlines the progress made by member countries in adhering to the policy, which aims to increase transparency and public access to IMF documents.

Main Points

I. Trends in Publication Rates

• The publication rate of reports discussed by the Board has increased over the years.
• Staff Reports had a publication rate of 78% in 2004, rising to 84% in 2006.
• Article IV and UFR reports saw an increase from 77% in 2004 to 85% in 2006.
• Stand-alone Article IV reports improved from 70% to 83%.
• Stand-alone UFR reports increased from 83% to 87%.
• Joint Staff Assessments had a publication rate of 81% in 2004, rising to 84% in 2006.
• HIPC Country Papers had a publication rate of 80% in 2006.
• Article IV Public Information Notices (PINs) increased from 90% to 94%.
• LOIs/MEFPs and TMUs had a publication rate of 93% in 2004, increasing to 96% in 2006.
• Policy Papers saw a slight decrease in publication rates from 71% to 67%.

II. Lags Between Board Consideration and Publication

• The average lag between Board consideration and publication decreased over time.
• Advanced economies had minimal lags, with an average of 12 days in 2004, dropping to 10 days in 2006.
• Emerging markets had an average lag of 45 days in 2004, which slightly decreased to 41 days in 2006.
• Developing countries showed a trend of decreasing lags, from 45 days in 2004 to 43 days in 2006.
• Africa had an average lag of 49 days in 2004, decreasing to 45 days in 2006.
• Asia had an average lag of 46 days in 2004, reducing to 36 days in 2006.
• Central and Eastern Europe saw a significant increase in lag, from 20 days in 2004 to 31 days in 2006.
• CIS and Mongolia had an average lag of 25 days in 2004, increasing to 34 days in 2006.
• Middle East had a high lag of 56 days in 2004, reducing to 33 days in 2006.
• Western Hemisphere had an average lag of 65 days in 2004, increasing to 69 days in 2006.
• Article IV PINs showed a steady decrease in lag, from 31 days in 2004 to 19 days in 2006.
• UFR and PSI Chairman's statements had minimal lags, with an average of 2 days in 2004, decreasing to 1 day in 2006.
• Country Policy Intention Documents had an average lag of 29 days in 2004, decreasing to 21 days in 2006.
• Policy Papers saw an increase in lag from 28 days in 2004 to 39 days in 2006.

III. Trends in Recourse to Deletions

• Deletions in reports have generally decreased over time.
• Article IV and UFR reports had a deletion rate of 16% in 2004, decreasing to 10% in 2006.
• Advanced economies had a deletion rate of 8% in 2004, increasing slightly to 8% in 2006.
• Emerging markets saw a deletion rate of 32% in 2004, decreasing to 23% in 2006.
• Developing countries had a deletion rate of 13% in 2004, decreasing to 7% in 2006.
• Africa had a deletion rate of 18% in 2004, decreasing to 12% in 2006.
• Asia had a deletion rate of 4% in 2004, remaining at 0% in 2006.
• Central and Eastern Europe had a deletion rate of 13% in 2004, decreasing to 5% in 2006.
• CIS and Mongolia had a deletion rate of 37% in 2004, decreasing to 26% in 2006.
• Middle East had a deletion rate of 8% in 2004, remaining at 9% in 2006.
• Western Hemisphere had a deletion rate of 33% in 2004, decreasing to 22% in 2006.
• Deletions on exchange rate issues decreased from 36% in 2004 to 23% in 2006.
• Deletions on financial sector issues decreased from 36% in 2004 to 23% in 2006.

IV. Publication Behavior of Members

• A total of 143 members (136 in 2005-2006) published all Article IV and UFR Staff Reports by the end of 2006.
• The list includes a variety of countries, such as **Afghanistan, Albania, Algeria, Antigua and Barbuda, Armenia, Australia, Austria, Bahamas, Bangladesh, Barbados, Belarus, Belgium, Belize, Benin, Bolivia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Botswana, Bulgaria, Burkina Faso, Burundi, Cambodia, Cameroon, Canada, Cape Verde, Central African Republic, Chad, Chile, China, P.R. of, Colombia, Comoros, Congo, Democratic Republic of the, Congo, Republic of, Costa Rica, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Dominica, Ecuador, Egypt, El Salvador, Equatorial Guinea, Estonia, Ethiopia, Finland, France, Gabon, Gambia, Georgia, Germany, Ghana, Greece, Grenada, Guatemala, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Haiti, Honduras, Hungary, Iceland, India, Indonesia, Iran, I. Rep. of, Iraq, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Ivory Coast, Jamaica, Japan, Jordan, Kazakhstan, Kenya, Kiribati, Kyrgyz Republic, Laos, Latvia, Lebanon, Lesotho, Liberia, Libya, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Madagascar, Malawi, Malaysia, Maldives, Mali, Malta, Marshall Islands, Rep., Mauritania, Mauritius, Mexico, Micronesia, Moldova, Mongolia, Morocco, Mozambique, Myanmar, Namibia, Nauru, Nepal, Netherlands, New Zealand, Nicaragua, Niger, Nigeria, Norway, Oman, Pakistan, Palau, Palestine, Panama, Papua New Guinea, Paraguay, Peru, Philippines, Poland, Portugal, Qatar, Romania, Russia, Rwanda, Saint Kitts and Nevis, Saint Lucia, Saint Vincent and The Grenadines, Samoa, San Marino, Saudi Arabia, Senegal, Serbia and Montenegro, Seychelles, Sierra Leone, Singapore, Slovakia, Slovenia, Solomon Islands, Somalia, South Africa, South Sudan, South Korea, Spain, Sri Lanka, Sudan, Suriname, Swaziland, Sweden, Switzerland, Syria, Tajikistan, Tanzania, Thailand, Togo, Tonga, Trinidad and Tobago, Tunisia, Turkey, Turkmenistan, Tuvalu, Uganda, Ukraine, United Arab Emirates, United Kingdom, United States, Uruguay, Uzbekistan, Vanuatu, Vatican City, Venezuela, Vietnam, Yemen, and Zambia.
• Cote d'Ivoire, Fiji, San Marino, Somalia, and Venezuela did not have any Article IV or UFR Staff Reports discussed during the relevant period.

Key Information

• The Transparency Policy aims to enhance public access to IMF documents.
• Publication rates have generally increased over the years, indicating better compliance with the policy.
• Publication lags have varied by region and report type, with some areas showing improvement and others experiencing delays.
• Deletions in reports have decreased, suggesting a trend towards greater transparency.
• The Executive Board is informed of these trends through regular reports, with electronic distribution becoming the norm.
• Rolling updates are issued annually to provide the latest information on the implementation of the Transparency Policy.