2025建筑教育与实践的现状及未来报告：基于对学生、教师与相关从业者的调查_135页_917kb

Building Impact: Summary

Core Content

This report, Building Impact, provides a comprehensive analysis of the current state and future of architecture education and practice in the U.S. Building on the 1996 Building Community report (the Boyer Report), it explores how to enhance the impact and relevance of architectural education and the profession by addressing the intersection between education and practice. The study was conducted by RAND Education and Labor, with support from the American Institute of Architects (AIA), National Council of Architectural Registration Boards (NCARB), and the Association of Collegiate Schools of Architecture (ACSA). The findings are based on surveys and interviews with architecture students, faculty, and practicing professionals.

Main Viewpoints

1. Interest in Architecture

• Design and the creative process are key sources of interest for students and faculty.
• Media and early exposure to buildings or construction play a significant role in inspiring individuals to pursue architecture.
• Limited knowledge about program requirements and affordability are major barriers to entry.

2. Education and Practice Gap

• There is a noticeable gap between what is taught in architectural programs and what is required in professional practice.
• Technical skills and experience with new technologies are often lacking in graduates.
• Applied work experiences are recommended to bridge this gap and improve students' transition to the workforce.

3. Innovation and Technology

• AI and other emerging technologies are seen as important for the future of the profession.
• However, there is a need for additional support and resources to integrate these technologies into practice and education.
• There is mixed sentiment among professionals about the use of AI, but many see its potential to streamline workflows.

4. Social Change and Sustainability

• Sustainability, human health, and climate change are viewed as critical issues for the architecture profession to address.
• Participants emphasized the importance of these topics in both education and practice.
• Leadership support and financial resources are key barriers to incorporating social change topics into curricula and practice.

5. Diversity and Inclusion

• The profession remains largely homogeneous, with 62% of licensed architects being White men.
• Efforts to diversify the training pipeline and workforce have not yet translated into significant changes in the demographics of the profession.
• Cultural and structural barriers, such as the culture of overwork and lack of belonging, are particularly felt by people of color.

6. Collaboration Between Academia and Practice

• Faculty and professionals advocate for greater collaboration beyond traditional career preparation.
• Funding and time are essential to sustain and develop such collaborations.
• A "residency" model or structured training pathway is suggested to support early-career professionals.

Key Information

• Construction spending and architecture billing have declined over the past two years, yet the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics projects faster-than-average growth in demand for architects from 2023 to 2033.
• Student debt is a significant factor influencing professional and personal decisions.
• AI and digital tools such as building information modeling (BIM) and digital twins are expected to shape the future of architectural practice.
• Social change topics are increasingly important, but their integration into curricula and practice is hindered by lack of resources, support, and institutional commitment.
• Diversity in the profession remains a challenge, with systemic and cultural barriers affecting underrepresented groups.

Recommendations

The report offers five key recommendations aimed at improving the relationship between education and practice in architecture:

1. Increase Opportunities for Early Exposure to Architecture

   • Provide more systematic and inclusive engagement with K-12 students.
   • Utilize social media and creative activities to inspire interest in architecture.

2. Improve Access to and Affordability of Architecture Education

   • Revise admissions processes and consider alternative pathways.
   • Address financial barriers and program affordability to encourage more students to pursue architecture.

3. Strengthen Collaboration Between Academia and Practice

   • Integrate field-based learning and internships into academic programs.
   • Develop partnerships with industry, alumni, and research groups.
   • Consider creating two distinct tracks within NAAB-accredited programs for different career aspirations.

4. Eliminate Barriers to Professional Practice

   • Provide structured support for early-career professionals.
   • Improve a sense of belongingness among underrepresented groups.
   • Address the culture of overwork and promote work-life balance.

5. Unlearn and Invest in Organizational Culture and Learning

   • Encourage academic and professional leaders to prioritize social change topics.
   • Invest in training and development for faculty and staff to build capacity in social change.
   • Continue to address diversity and its implications on the profession and its ability to impact society.

Conclusion

Building Impact emphasizes the need for a renewed vision of architecture education and practice that is responsive to social and technological changes. It calls for a more inclusive, innovative, and socially engaged profession that better prepares students for the evolving demands of the field and supports the long-term resilience and relevance of the architecture industry.