2011年-IMF国际货币组织全球_Georgia_Selected_Issues_43页_1mb
报告摘要
Summary of "Georgia: Selected Issues"
Core Content
This document is a Selected Issues Paper prepared by the International Monetary Fund (IMF) staff for the periodic consultation with Georgia. It was completed on March 7, 2011 and provides an analysis of key economic issues including exchange rate assessment, international reserve adequacy, inflation trends, and tax productivity.
Main Points and Key Information
I. Exchange Rate Assessment and Competitiveness
- Crisis Impact: The 2008–09 financial crisis caused a sharp reversal in the lari exchange rate and led to a significant current account deficit.
- Exchange Rate Misalignment: The lari was moderately overvalued before the crisis, but the post-crisis correction has brought it much closer to medium-term equilibrium, reducing misalignment to about half to one-third of its pre-crisis level.
- Competitiveness Trends:
- Georgia's export volumes showed a sluggish recovery after the crisis.
- FDI fell sharply, which could have had a negative impact on export performance.
- The real effective exchange rate had a role in export competitiveness, but other non-exchange rate factors also influenced export market shares.
- The real exchange rate appreciation in 2008 led to export market share losses, while its depreciation in 2009 helped recover pre-crisis levels.
- However, from late 2009 onward, export market shares declined again, suggesting other constraints may be affecting competitiveness.
II. International Reserve Adequacy
- Reserve Adequacy: Based on traditional and composite indicators, Georgia's international reserves appear adequate.
- Reserve Metrics:
- Gross International Reserves (GIR) to prospective months of imports ratio was 3.8 in 2010, above the recommended 3-month level.
- GIR to broad money ratio was 68%, well above the 20% upper conventional range.
- GIR to short-term external debt ratio was 160%, exceeding the Greenspan-Guidotti threshold of 100%.
- Reserve Management: The current account contraction and official financing helped Georgia preserve reserve adequacy despite external and internal drains.
- Reserve Trends: From 2005 to 2010, international reserves increased steadily, from USD 474 million to USD 2,257 million.
- Composite Indicators:
- Wijnholds and Kapteyn's indicator suggests GIR coverage was 29% above the threshold in 2010.
- Lipschitz et al.'s indicator shows reserve coverage was 63% of the threshold, but has increased significantly over the last five years and is in line with peer countries.
III. Inflation Trends and Monetary Policy Options
- Inflation Volatility: Georgia's headline inflation is highly volatile, mainly driven by food price increases.
- Shocks and Inflation: Georgia's inflation is sensitive to both supply and demand shocks, but this responsiveness is short-lived.
- Interest Rate Transmission: The interest rate pass-through mechanism has been improving, but remains limited.
- Monetary Policy: A combination of policy rate adjustments and reserve requirement changes is suggested as a more effective monetary policy tool.
IV. Enhancing Tax Productivity in Georgia
- Tax Productivity Challenge: There is limited room to increase tax productivity in Georgia, as tax-to-GDP ratio has been relatively stable.
- Tax System Overview:
- Georgia has few tax breaks, but compliance with Corporate Income Tax (CIT) and VAT is limited.
- Personal Income Tax (PIT) compliance is better, and administrative reforms should continue to support it.
- International Comparison:
- Georgia's tax productivity is below that of peer countries.
- The structure of FDI has shifted, with a decline in export-promoting sectors and a rise in real estate and other non-export sectors.
- The decline in FDI has had a negative impact on export performance, especially in tradable sectors.
- Policy Implications:
- A recovery of FDI is crucial for export competitiveness.
- FDI composition has not improved, and FDI inflows remain below pre-crisis levels.
- Alternative mechanisms, such as increased domestic investment in tradable sectors, should be explored to support export performance.
Key Conclusions
- The lari has moved closer to medium-term equilibrium post-crisis, though it remains moderately overvalued.
- FDI has declined sharply and has not yet recovered, which could hinder export growth.
- International reserves are adequate, and Georgia's reserve metrics are in line with peer countries.
- Inflation in Georgia is highly volatile and sensitive to shocks, but interest rate transmission is limited.
- Tax productivity in Georgia is below average, and reforms are needed to improve compliance and increase efficiency.
References
- CGER (Center for Global Development and the IMF) methodologies.
- Wijnholds and Kapteyn (2001) composite indicators.
- Lipschitz, Messmacher, and Mourmouras (2006) composite indicators.
- IMF staff estimates and data from Georgian authorities.
展开完整摘要
试读结束,高清完整版pdf/doc/ppt,请点下载