2007年-世界发展银行全球_Brazil_-_Improving_Fiscal_Circumstances_for_Growth___Volume_2_Main_Report_118页_9mb
报告摘要
Summary of Brazil's Fiscal Circumstances and Growth
Core Content
This document provides an in-depth analysis of Brazil's public expenditure policy and its impact on economic growth. It is divided into five main sections, each focusing on different aspects of fiscal management and its implications for the country's development.
Main Report Overview
1. Public Spending and Economic Growth
- Public Spending Trends: Brazil's public sector has expanded significantly over the past 50 years, becoming one of the largest among middle-income countries.
- Historical Drivers: The expansion was driven by an explicit development strategy in the 1950s-1970s that emphasized strong state intervention.
- Fiscal Imbalance: The expansionary fiscal policy led to unsustainable debt and macroeconomic instability, which slowed growth in the 1980s.
- Recent Trends: Since the late 1990s, public spending has exceeded 40% of GDP, while the tax burden has reached 36% of GDP, comparable to OECD countries.
- Decentralization: Decentralization increased the size of the public sector, with municipalities taking on more social responsibilities.
- Public Enterprises: Despite privatization, public enterprises still play a significant role, contributing over 14% of GDP in the early 2000s.
- Fiscal Challenges: The public sector's growth is driven by structural factors, including the 1988 Constitution, past fiscal laxity, and fiscal decentralization.
2. Composition of Public Expenditures and Growth Effects
- Economic Impact: Current expenditure composition is not conducive to long-term economic growth.
- Key Findings:
- Public capital stock positively affects private capital stock and economic growth.
- Government subsidies have a positive short-run effect on private capital accumulation but dampen growth over time due to debt accumulation.
- Government consumption and social security/assistance transfers negatively impact growth, especially in the long run.
- The tax burden negatively affects capital accumulation and economic growth.
- Simulation Results:
- Reallocation of spending from social security to economic infrastructure could boost growth.
- Financing transfers through public debt reduces growth.
- Short-term growth from education spending is offset by long-term debt accumulation.
3. Sources and Effects of Expenditure Rigidity
- Budget Rigidity: A major obstacle to expenditure reforms in Brazil.
- Revenue Earmarking: A large portion of federal revenue is earmarked for specific purposes, reducing fiscal flexibility.
- Mandated Expenditures: 90% of total non-financial expenditure is non-discretionary.
- Overlap Between Revenue and Expenditure Rigidity: The actual degree of budget flexibility is less than the "free" portions of either revenue or expenditure.
- Fiscal Adjustments: The federal government has had to seek alternative revenue sources to balance its accounts.
4. Public Expenditure in the Road Transport Sector
- Transport Matrix: Brazil's transport matrix is dominated by road transport, with significant volumes in tons-km-used.
- Road Network: The road network has expanded over time, but its condition remains a concern.
- Investment Trends: Federal investments in roads have fluctuated, with some improvements noted.
- Fiscal Allocation: The CIDE (Contribution for Intervention in the Economic Domain) is a key revenue source for transport investments.
- Expenditure Management: The report evaluates the efficiency of expenditure management in the road transport sector, highlighting issues with budget execution and allocation.
5. Conclusions and Recommendations
- Recommendations: Institutional reforms to improve the expenditure management cycle are necessary to address fiscal weaknesses.
- Growth Strategy: Brazil should increase public investment by reallocating resources from less productive areas.
- Fiscal Constraints: The government must maintain control over the tax burden and public debt to ensure sustainable growth.
- Political and Technical Challenges: Expenditure reallocations are politically and technically challenging but essential for long-term fiscal health.
Key Information
- Currency Equivalent: US$1.00 = R$2.12 (as of January 31, 2007).
- Government Fiscal Year: January 1 – December 31.
- Key Institutions and Acronyms:
- BCB: Central Bank of Brazil
- FGTS: Fund for Employees based on Duration of Employment
- LOA: Annual Budget Law
- LDO: Budgetary Directives Law
- LOAS: Organic Law of Social Assistance
- MPOG: Ministry of Planning, Budget, and Management
- CIDE: Contribution for Intervention in the Economic Domain
- FED: Federal Government Acquisitions
- FPM: Fund based on Municipal Participation
- FPE: Fund based on State Participation
- FSE: Social Fund for Emergencies
- FAT: Fund for Worker Assistance
- FNO: Fund for Financing of the North Region
- FNE: Fund for Financing of the Northeast Region
- FCVS: Fund for Compensation of Variance in Salaries
- FCO: Fund for Financing of the Center-West Region
- FUND: National Fund for Development
- FUNDEF: Fund for Maintenance and Development of Basic Education and Training of Teachers
- FUNCAFÉ: Fund for Coffee Price Stabilization and Support
- PPI: Pilot Project for Infrastructure
- PPP: Public-Private Partnerships
- DNER-DNIT: National Department for Land Infrastructure
- DRU: De-earmarking of Federal Revenues
- MTEF: Medium Term Expenditure Framework
- SIAFI: Integrated System for Financial Management
- SELIC: Central Bank interest rate
- TRU: Unified Highway Tax
- TCU: Federal Accounting Unit
- RGR: General Reserve of Reversion
- RJU: Unified Social Security System for Judicial Employees
- RPPS: Social Security System for Public Servants
- SS: Social Security
- SE: Standard Error
- NGO: Non-Governmental Organization
- OECD: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development
- IADB: Inter-American Development Bank
- IBGE: Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics
- PAB: Floor for Basic Services
- PDG: Global Expenditures Program
Conclusion
The report concludes that Brazil's fiscal policy and public expenditure management are critical to its economic growth. It recommends institutional reforms to enhance fiscal flexibility and improve the efficiency of public spending, particularly in the road transport sector. The analysis emphasizes the need for a balanced approach to public investment and fiscal responsibility to ensure sustainable economic development.
展开完整摘要
试读结束,高清完整版pdf/doc/ppt,请点下载