2025年全球AI教师调研报告_AI与学术界的碰撞融合_教师观点洞察_42页_4mb

Digital Education Council Global AI Faculty Survey 2025 Summary

Core Content

The Digital Education Council (DEC) Global AI Faculty Survey 2025 provides an in-depth look at how faculty members in higher education are using and perceiving artificial intelligence (AI) in their teaching practices. It includes data from 1,681 responses across 52 institutions in 28 countries, highlighting a global perspective on AI integration in academia.

The survey addresses key areas such as current AI usage, faculty sentiment on AI, concerns regarding its impact on teaching and learning, and the need for improved guidelines and resources. It also explores the future of AI in education, the skills required for educators, and the preferred policies for AI use in assignments.

Main Points

1. Current AI Usage in Teaching

• 61% of faculty have used AI in teaching, with the top use case being the creation of teaching materials.
• 88% of faculty who use AI report minimal to moderate use, indicating a cautious approach.
• Time and resources are the main barriers preventing faculty from using AI in teaching.

2. Faculty Sentiment on AI

• 57% of faculty have a positive sentiment toward AI in education.
• 13% hold a negative sentiment.
• 30% are neutral, showing uncertainty or mixed feelings.
• Faculty view AI as both an opportunity and a challenge, with 64% anticipating significant to transformative change in their roles as instructors.

3. Skills and Future Readiness

• Faculty believe that critical thinking is the most important skill for educators in the AI era.
• 66% of faculty think AI integration is necessary to prepare students for future AI-augmented work environments.
• 54% of faculty believe student evaluation methods need significant changes, with 13% calling for an urgent revamp.

4. AI in Assignments

• 50% of faculty think assignment redesign is needed to be more AI-resistant.
• 57% prefer AI use with disclosure and specific instructions (referred to as "Use with Compliance").
• Faculty are cautious about AI use in grading and analytics, with 22% being cautious and 15% strongly against.

5. Key Concerns

• 83% of faculty are concerned about students' ability to critically evaluate AI-generated output.
• 82% are worried about students becoming too reliant on AI.
• 52% of students (from the DEC Global AI Student Survey 2024) also express concern about over-reliance on AI affecting academic performance.

6. Guidelines, Communication, and Resources

• 80% of faculty feel that institutional AI guidelines are not comprehensive.
• Only 6% are fully satisfied with AI literacy resources provided by their institutions.
• Faculty call for improved AI guidelines, clear communication, and adequate resources and training to support AI integration.

Key Information

• AI Integration Challenges: Faculty are cautious about AI use, primarily due to lack of time/resources, uncertainty about its use, and concerns over ethics and academic integrity.
• AI Governance: The survey supports the DEC AI Governance Framework, which suggests a transition from "Use with Disclosure" to "Use with Compliance".
• Faculty Support Needed: Institutions need to invest in training, policy development, and technology infrastructure to enable effective AI integration.
• Global Collaboration: The DEC encourages global institutions to join its efforts and collaborate through Thematic Working Groups and the DEC Global Summit.

Conclusion

The survey underscores that while faculty are broadly positive about AI's potential in education, they require stronger institutional support, clearer governance frameworks, and enhanced AI literacy to fully harness its benefits. The need for updated student assessments and assignment redesign is also highlighted. The findings align with the DEC Global AI Student Survey, reinforcing the importance of balanced AI integration and ethical considerations in higher education.