EBA欧洲银行-CP31_27页_359kb

CEBS Guidelines on Concentration Risk Management (CP31) Summary

Core Content

The CEBS Guidelines on aspects of the management of concentration risk under the supervisory review process (CP31) provide a comprehensive framework for identifying, measuring, managing, monitoring, and reporting concentration risk in credit institutions. These guidelines are designed to complement the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD) and other CEBS guidelines, ensuring a holistic and proportionate approach to concentration risk management.

Main Views

1. Definition of Concentration Risk

Concentration risk refers to exposures that may result in:

• Losses large enough to threaten the institution's health or ability to maintain core operations
• A material change in the institution's risk profile

It is divided into two types:

• Intra-risk concentration: Concentrations within a single risk category.
• Inter-risk concentration: Concentrations across different risk categories, possibly due to shared risk drivers or interdependencies.

2. Scope and Importance

Concentration risk can affect an institution's capital, liquidity, and earnings. It is not limited to credit risk but includes:

• Credit risk
• Market risk
• Operational risk
• Liquidity risk

The guidelines emphasize that concentration risk should be viewed as a single risk event that may impact multiple areas of the institution.

3. Holistic and Integrated Approach

The guidelines promote a holistic approach to concentration risk, requiring institutions to:

• Integrate risk management across all risk categories.
• Consider second-order effects such as indirect impacts from economic changes.
• Use stress testing to identify hidden concentrations and assess potential impacts under adverse conditions.

4. Proportionality Principle

The implementation of concentration risk management should be proportional to the size, complexity, and systemic importance of the institution. Smaller and less complex institutions may primarily face concentration risk in credit risk, while larger institutions may have more complex risk interdependencies.

5. Framework for Identification, Measurement, and Control

Institutions must:

• Identify all material concentrations, including those from different risk types, business lines, and entities.
• Measure the impact of these concentrations on earnings, solvency, liquidity, and regulatory compliance.
• Control and mitigate concentrations through appropriate limit structures, diversification, and risk mitigation techniques.

6. Reporting and Communication

Institutions should establish reliable, timely, and comprehensive monitoring and reporting frameworks for concentration risk, including:

• Qualitative and quantitative information on concentrations and risk drivers.
• Regular and ad-hoc reporting based on the volatility of risk drivers.
• Escalation procedures for limit breaches.

7. Capital Planning and ICAAP

Concentration risk should be integrated into:

• Internal Capital Adequacy Assessment Process (ICAAP)
• Capital planning frameworks

Institutions should assess how much capital is adequate to cover concentration risk and demonstrate this in their capital planning.

Key Information

1. Implementation

• The guidelines are expected to be implemented by CEBS members by 31 December 2010.
• CEBS recommends a phased implementation and allows national supervisors to provide flexibility.
• An implementation study is planned one year after the recommended date to ensure harmonization across Member States.

2. Supervisory Expectations

• Supervisors expect institutions to hold enough capital to cover all risks, including concentration risk.
• Institutions should actively manage risk exposures to prevent concentrated risks from emerging.
• Supervisors should monitor and evaluate the institution's concentration risk management processes as part of the Pillar 2 framework.

3. Risk Management Principles

• Institutions must define material concentration in line with their risk tolerance.
• They should establish top-down concentration risk limit structures at the group level.
• Data management systems are essential to identify and monitor concentrations.
• Stress testing is a key tool for identifying hidden concentrations and assessing their impact.

4. Specific Risk Areas

• Credit risk: Involves large and connected exposures, sectoral or geographic concentrations, and complex products.
• Market risk: Includes concentration from single or correlated risk factors, and may be underestimated by VaR models.
• Operational risk: May be linked to concentration in processes, systems, or third-party dependencies.
• Liquidity risk: Involves concentrations in funding sources, maturities, and off-balance sheet positions.

5. Supervisory Review and Assessment

• The supervisory review process should ensure that institutions have adequate risk management frameworks.
• Institutions must demonstrate how they assess and manage concentration risk in relation to their capital and risk appetite.

Annexes

• Annex 1: Examples of concentration risk (e.g., single borrower, sectoral, geographic).
• Annex 2: Examples of indicators used for concentration risk management (e.g., internal liquidity ratios, limit utilisation).

Conclusion

The CEBS Guidelines (CP31) are a critical component of the supervisory review process under Pillar 2. They emphasize the need for a holistic, integrated, and proactive approach to managing concentration risk, which can have significant impacts on an institution's stability and resilience. The guidelines also highlight the importance of stress testing, data management, and communication between management and supervisors to ensure effective risk mitigation and capital adequacy.