卡内基国际和平基金会-Grading-Progress-on-13-Steps-Toward-Nuclear-Disarmament_10页_209kb

13 Steps Toward Disarmament: A Policy Outlook

Core Content

The document provides an analysis of the progress made on the "13 Practical Steps Toward Nuclear Disarmament" in the context of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) 2010 Review Conference. It emphasizes the importance of these steps as a framework for nuclear disarmament, despite the shifting political landscape and varying levels of commitment among nuclear-weapon states (NWS) and non-nuclear-weapon states (NNWS).

Main Points

• Relevance of the 13 Steps: The 13 Steps remain a critical reference point for disarmament discussions, especially as the world considers reducing nuclear terrorism threats. They are seen as essential for any pathway to nuclear disarmament.

• U.S. Leadership and Obama's Vision: President Obama's 2009 Prague speech reinvigorated the U.S. commitment to nuclear disarmament, calling for a world without nuclear weapons and proposing concrete steps like CTBT ratification, FMCT negotiations, and strategic arms control treaties. However, the U.S. has not yet fully aligned with the 13 Steps in practice.

• Historical Context: The 13 Steps were first formalized in 1995 during the NPT Review and Extension Conference, and later expanded by the New Agenda Coalition in 2000. They were intended to be a set of measurable actions toward disarmament, but have become more theoretical over time.

• Progress and Challenges:

  • Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty (CTBT): The U.S. and China have signed but not ratified the CTBT, while the UK, France, and Russia have ratified it. The treaty requires ratification by 44 states, including India, Iran, and North Korea, for entry into force.
  • Fissile Material Cut-off Treaty (FMCT): Negotiations are ongoing, but verification remains a challenge. The U.S. has shifted from its previous stance, advocating for an effectively verifiable FMCT, while China and Russia continue to insist on linking FMCT with other issues like outer space.
  • Verification and Transparency: Some steps, such as verification of fissile material and transparency on nuclear force postures, have made progress, but others, like the Trilateral Initiative, have not been completed.
  • Operational Readiness and Role of Nuclear Weapons: There is a lack of consensus on how to measure the diminishing role of nuclear weapons in security policies. Some states, like France, have taken positive steps by dismantling fissile material production facilities.

• Global Participation: The document stresses that nuclear disarmament is a global issue and that all states, including those outside the NPT, should be involved in shaping the process. It calls for greater transparency from China and the inclusion of India and Pakistan in disarmament discussions.

Key Recommendations

• Reinvigorate the 13 Steps: Delegates at the 2010 NPT Review Conference should consider revisiting and strengthening the 13 Steps, while also exploring new frameworks like Japan's "11 Benchmarks for Global Nuclear Disarmament."

• Expand Disarmament Dialogue: The dialogue on disarmament should include all nuclear-weapon-holding states, not just the five recognized NWS under the NPT. This includes India, Pakistan, and Israel.

• Standardize Reporting and Verification: There is a need for standardized reporting and enhanced verification mechanisms to ensure accountability and progress in nuclear disarmament.

• Promote Transparency and Unilateral Reductions: All nuclear-weapon states should increase transparency and pursue further unilateral reductions in their nuclear arsenals.

• Address Non-NPT States: Non-nuclear-weapon states, especially those with nuclear capabilities like India and Pakistan, should take on more nonproliferation responsibilities.

Key Information

• 13 Steps Overview: These steps include measures such as CTBT entry into force, testing moratorium, FMCT negotiations, creation of a subsidiary body in the Conference on Disarmament (CD), and verification of disarmament progress.

• Progress by Country:

  • U.S.: Has shifted toward more verifiable disarmament measures but has not yet ratified the CTBT. The Obama administration has pledged to pursue CTBT ratification and reduce the role of nuclear weapons in security.
  • Russia: Has ratified the CTBT and is open to a subsidiary body, but has not fully committed to FMCT negotiations.
  • China: Has not ratified the CTBT and continues to link FMCT with other issues like outer space.
  • France and UK: Both have ratified the CTBT and are more transparent in their nuclear policies.

• Verification and Transparency: These are key components of the 13 Steps, but progress has been uneven. The U.S. and Russia have made some strides, while China and others remain opaque.

• Role of Japan: Japan's "11 Benchmarks" offer a new, more inclusive approach to nuclear disarmament that focuses on global participation and conditions toward zero nuclear weapons.

Conclusion

The 13 Steps remain a relevant and necessary framework for nuclear disarmament, but they require a renewed focus and broader participation from all states. The document suggests that while the steps are not obsolete, moving beyond them with a more comprehensive and inclusive approach may be more effective in achieving a world free of nuclear weapons.