2016年-世界发展银行全球_FY15_Republic_of_Congo_Country_Opinion_Survey_Report_129页_3mb
报告摘要
FY15 Republic of Congo Country Opinion Survey Report Summary
Core Content
This report presents the findings of the FY15 Republic of Congo Country Opinion Survey conducted by the World Bank Group's Public Opinion Research Group (PORG). The survey aimed to understand stakeholders' perceptions of the WBG's work in the country, covering a range of topics including general issues, attitudes, effectiveness, and future role of the WBG.
Main Objectives
- Assess how stakeholders in the Republic of Congo perceive the World Bank Group (WBG).
- Evaluate the WBG's effectiveness and contributions to development results.
- Identify the most important development priorities and instruments for poverty reduction.
- Explore the WBG's role in building country systems and promoting public-private partnerships.
- Understand the WBG's knowledge work and financial instruments in the context of the Republic of Congo.
- Determine the future role and collaboration needs of the WBG.
Methodology
- The survey was conducted from May to June 2015.
- 370 stakeholders were invited to participate, resulting in 265 responses (72% response rate).
- Stakeholders included government officials, project implementers, consultants, NGOs, private sector entities, and others.
- The survey included both open and closed-ended questions.
- Indicator questions were used for the WBG's annual Corporate Scorecard.
- Data were weighted to allow for comparison with the FY12 survey, excluding stakeholder groups not present in both years.
Demographics of the Sample
- Respondents from the private sector and financial sector were combined.
- Respondents from NGOs, community-based organizations, private foundations, trade unions, and faith-based groups were categorized as "CSO".
- A few respondents from government offices were included in the "Other" category.
- No respondents from youth groups and the judiciary branch were included.
- The survey covered various geographic locations and stakeholder groups.
General Issues Facing the Republic of Congo
- Stakeholders identified "education", "rural development", and "poverty reduction" as the most important development priorities.
- Respondents in FY15 were less likely to believe the country is headed in the right direction compared to FY12.
- Local government stakeholders were most positive about the country's direction, while CSOs were least positive.
- Key factors for poverty reduction included "job creation/employment", "agricultural development", and "economic growth".
Overall Attitudes Toward the WBG
- Respondents rated the WBG's effectiveness on a scale from 1 to 10 (mean = 6.6).
- The WBG's effectiveness was significantly different from FY12.
- Stakeholders believed the WBG's greatest values were "training/capacity building" and "financial resources".
- The greatest weaknesses identified were "not willing to honestly criticize policies" and "imposing technocratic solutions without regard to political realities".
- The WBG's most effective instruments for poverty reduction were "investment lending", "technical assistance", and "capacity development".
Sectoral Importance and Effectiveness
- The WBG's effectiveness in specific sectors was assessed, with key drivers including regulatory framework, information and communications technology, public sector governance, and equality of opportunity.
- Stakeholders believed the WBG's work was most effective in agricultural development, education, and public sector governance.
- Collaboration with the WBG was found to be associated with higher effectiveness ratings.
- The WBG's role in promoting private-public partnerships and supporting the poorest was also evaluated.
How the WBG Operates
- Respondents in FY15 and FY12 had similar levels of agreement with statements about the WBG's work.
- Collaboration with the WBG was associated with similar levels of agreement.
- There was a significant shift in perceptions regarding the WBG's monitoring and evaluation, conditions on lending, and fund disbursement.
- Respondents rated the WBG's staff preparedness and local presence, with notable differences from FY12.
WBG's Knowledge and Instruments
- PMUs and consultants used the WBG's knowledge work and activities most frequently.
- Stakeholders rated the WBG's knowledge work as meeting the country's needs for research and analysis.
- The significance of the WBG's knowledge work in development results was evaluated.
- Technical quality of knowledge work was rated highly, but timeliness and adaptability were also important.
- The WBG's knowledge work was rated lower in terms of being translated into local languages.
Future Role of the WBG
- Stakeholders suggested the WBG should focus on "education", "rural development", and "poverty reduction" for maximum impact.
- There was a call for the WBG to "reduce the complexity of obtaining its financing" and "improve the quality of its experts".
- Collaboration with NGOs, the private sector, and beneficiaries was emphasized.
- The WBG should enhance communication and information sharing to better serve the country's development needs.
Key Findings
- The WBG's effectiveness and development contributions are viewed positively by stakeholders, though there are areas for improvement.
- Collaboration and communication are critical for enhancing the WBG's impact.
- The WBG is seen as a valuable partner, but its ability to adapt to local conditions and ensure timely and relevant knowledge delivery remains a concern.
- Future recommendations include focusing on education, rural development, and poverty reduction, as well as improving the clarity and relevance of its financial instruments and knowledge services.
展开完整摘要
试读结束,高清完整版pdf/doc/ppt,请点下载