2013年-世界发展银行全球_Road_for_Cultural_Heritage___Policy_Note_on_Cultural_Heritage_and_Infrastructure_Development_in_Timor-Leste_14页_745kb

Summary of the Democratic Republic of Timor-Leste Road for Cultural Heritage Policy Note

Core Content

This Policy Note, published by the World Bank in July 2013, focuses on the intersection between infrastructure development and cultural heritage conservation in the Democratic Republic of Timor-Leste. It emphasizes the need for a coordinated and sustainable approach to protect and develop the nation's rich cultural heritage, which includes both tangible and intangible elements, in the context of increasing infrastructure investment. The document outlines four key policy recommendations to ensure that cultural heritage is preserved and utilized for the benefit of communities and the economy.

Main Views

• Cultural Heritage as a National Asset: Timor-Leste's cultural heritage is a crucial component of national identity and offers significant potential for sustainable tourism and economic development.
• Infrastructure as a Double-Edged Sword: Infrastructure development can both threaten and enhance cultural heritage. It requires proactive measures to minimize risks and maximize opportunities.
• Legal and Institutional Frameworks: A strong legal framework and institutional capacity are essential for effective cultural heritage protection and development.
• Community Empowerment: Local communities must be actively involved in the management and development of cultural heritage assets, with particular attention to gender and social inclusion.
• Market Development: Cultural heritage can be leveraged as a niche market for tourism, with potential to be integrated with other recreational and economic activities.

Key Information

I. Introduction

• Timor-Leste's cultural heritage is under unprecedented pressure due to rapid infrastructure development.
• The national budget expanded fivefold from 2008 to 2012, with 48% allocated to infrastructure.
• The legal framework for cultural heritage protection is still underdeveloped, necessitating policy adaptation.

II. Policy Recommendations

Policy Recommendation #1: Strengthen the Legal Framework and Institutional Capacity for Protecting and Developing Cultural Heritage

• Objective: Enhance the legal and institutional capacity to protect and develop cultural heritage.
• Key Actions:
  • Become a signatory to international conventions (e.g., UN Convention for the Safeguarding of Intangible Cultural Heritage).
  • Convert Government Resolution 25/2011 into a law or integrate cultural heritage into environmental and social protection laws.
  • Improve staff training, information management, and linkages between SSAC and other relevant government agencies.

Policy Recommendation #2: Build Knowledge and Understanding of the Value of Cultural Heritage

• Objective: Increase awareness of the value and potential of cultural heritage among stakeholders.
• Key Actions:
  • Conduct comprehensive mapping of cultural heritage assets, especially in areas affected by infrastructure projects.
  • Improve the Information Management System for cultural heritage data.
  • Coordinate with universities and research organizations to share findings.
  • Engage with relevant ministries and stakeholders to identify cultural heritage dimensions in infrastructure projects.

Policy Recommendation #3: Empower Communities to Conserve and Develop their Cultural Heritage Assets

• Objective: Support community-led initiatives for cultural heritage conservation and development.
• Key Actions:
  • Establish community groups for managing cultural heritage assets.
  • Create a national fund and granting facility to support these groups.
  • Implement a cultural heritage extension program for capacity building at the district level.
  • Promote gender and social inclusion in decision-making processes related to heritage assets.

Policy Recommendation #4: Develop Markets for Sustainable Tourism and Creative Industries

• Objective: Leverage cultural heritage for sustainable tourism and economic growth.
• Key Actions:
  • Expand market development programming with a focus on cultural heritage tourism.
  • Promote cultural heritage as a niche market, linked with environmental and adventure tourism.
  • Establish a guiding association and support the professional development of guides.
  • Coordinate with local communities and retailers to promote cultural products.

Annexes

Annex 1: Case Study – The Road to Promoting Cultural Heritage for Development

• This project, a collaboration between the Ministry of Tourism and the World Bank, aimed to identify and develop cultural heritage assets for sustainable tourism.
• It linked with the Timor-Leste Road Climate Resilience Project, which improved road infrastructure in Dili to Ainaro.
• The project focused on mapping and cataloging tangible heritage assets, with plans to expand to intangible heritage in the future.
• It emphasized inclusive multi-stakeholder consultations to define and manage cultural heritage assets.

Annex 2: Example – Lacoto Sacred House

• Lacoto is a sacred house in Dili, historically significant for its role in the resistance and as a symbol of customary culture.
• It is under customary ownership, and clan leaders are responsible for its management.
• The project recommends forming a community organization with support from SSAC to manage and develop the site for tourism.
• The site has potential to attract tourists due to its location and historical significance.

Annex 3: International Examples of Cultural Heritage Development

• The World Bank has supported various cultural heritage projects globally, including urban restoration in Jordan and community-based initiatives in Guizhou, China.
• These projects demonstrate that cultural heritage can contribute to economic and social development through tourism and income generation.
• Examples include Zanzibar's traditional stone waterfront, which generated a 47% internal rate of return, and Azerbaijan's cultural sites, which increased local property values.

Annex 4: Government Resolution No. 25/2011

• This resolution mandates the State Secretariat of Arts and Culture (SSAC) to 'defend, protect, conserve and develop' cultural heritage.
• It reflects the government's commitment to using culture as a tool for national affirmation and identity preservation.

Conclusion

The Policy Note underscores the importance of integrating cultural heritage into infrastructure development strategies. It provides a roadmap for strengthening legal frameworks, building institutional capacity, empowering communities, and developing sustainable tourism and creative industries. These recommendations aim to ensure that cultural heritage is not only preserved but also actively used to enhance the social and economic well-being of Timor-Leste.