2016年-世界发展银行全球_Doing_Business_Economy_Profile_2017___Malaysia_114页_1mb
报告摘要
Doing Business 2017: Malaysia Summary
Core Content Overview
The Doing Business 2017 report by the World Bank Group provides an analysis of the regulatory environment for small and medium-sized businesses across 190 economies, including Malaysia. It evaluates 11 key areas of business regulation and offers insights into how these regulations impact the ease of doing business. The report also introduces a gender dimension in several indicators and expands the scope of the paying taxes indicator to include postfiling processes such as tax refunds, audits, and appeals.
Main Topics and Indicators
The report covers the following core topics:
- Starting a business
- Dealing with construction permits
- Getting electricity
- Registering property
- Getting credit
- Protecting minority investors
- Paying taxes
- Trading across borders
- Enforcing contracts
- Resolving insolvency
- Labor market regulation
Key Indicators for Malaysia
| Indicator | Malaysia DB2017 | Malaysia DB2016 | Comparator Economies |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starting a Business (Rank) | 112 | 59 | China (127), Hong Kong (3), Indonesia (151), Japan (89), Korea (11), Singapore (6), Best (New Zealand, 1) |
| Starting a Business (DTF Score) | 83.67 | 89.31 | China (81.02), Hong Kong (98.20), Indonesia (76.43), Japan (86.09), Korea (95.83), Singapore (96.49), Best (99.96) |
| Procedure - Men (Number) | 8.0 | 6.0 | China (9.0), Hong Kong (2.0), Indonesia (11.2), Japan (8.0), Korea (2.0), Singapore (3.0), Best (1.0) |
| Time - Men (Days) | 18.0 | 7.0 | China (28.9), Hong Kong (1.5), Indonesia (24.9), Japan (11.2), Korea (4.0), Singapore (2.5), Best (0.5) |
| Cost - Men (% of income per capita) | 6.2 | 6.7 | China (0.7), Hong Kong (0.6), Indonesia (19.4), Japan (7.5), Korea (14.6), Singapore (0.6), Best (0.0) |
| Procedure - Women (Number) | 9.0 | 7.0 | China (9.0), Hong Kong (2.0), Indonesia (11.2), Japan (8.0), Korea (2.0), Singapore (3.0), Best (1.0) |
| Time - Women (Days) | 19.0 | 8.0 | China (28.9), Hong Kong (1.5), Indonesia (24.9), Japan (11.2), Korea (4.0), Singapore (2.5), Best (0.5) |
| Cost - Women (% of income per capita) | 6.2 | 6.7 | China (0.7), Hong Kong (0.6), Indonesia (19.4), Japan (7.5), Korea (14.6), Singapore (0.6), Best (0.0) |
| Paid-in Min. Capital (% of income per capita) | 0.0 | 0.0 | All (0.0) |
| Dealing with Construction Permits (Rank) | 13 | 13 | China (177), Hong Kong (5), Indonesia (116), Japan (60), Korea (31), Singapore (10), Best (1) |
| Dealing with Construction Permits (DTF Score) | 81.10 | 81.08 | China (48.52), Hong Kong (84.82), Indonesia (65.73), Japan (73.33), Korea (77.84), Singapore (81.75), Best (87.40) |
| Procedures (Number) | 15.0 | 15.0 | China (22.0), Hong Kong (11.0), Indonesia (17.0), Japan (12.0), Korea (10.0), Singapore (9.0), Best (7.0) |
| Time (Days) | 79.0 | 79.0 | China (244.3), Hong Kong (72.0), Indonesia (200.2), Japan (197.0), Korea (28.0), Singapore (48.0), Best (18.0) |
| Cost (% of warehouse value) | 1.4 | 1.4 | China (7.0), Hong Kong (0.7), Indonesia (5.1), Japan (0.5), Korea (4.3), Singapore (6.1), Best (0.1) |
| Building Quality Control Index (0-15) | 13.0 | 13.0 | China (9.0), Hong Kong (12.0), Indonesia (13.0), Japan (11.0), Korea (8.0), Singapore (12.0), Best (15.0) |
| Getting Electricity (Rank) | 8 | 7 | China (97), Hong Kong (3), Indonesia (49), Japan (15), Korea (1), Singapore (10), Best (1) |
| Getting Electricity (DTF Score) | 94.34 | 94.33 | China (68.73), Hong Kong (99.02), Indonesia (80.92), Japan (89.88), Korea (99.88), Singapore (91.32), Best (99.88) |
| Procedures (Number) | 4.0 | 4.0 | China (5.5), Hong Kong (3.0), Indonesia (4.8), Japan (3.4), Korea (3.0), Singapore (4.0), Best (3.0) |
| Time (Days) | 31.0 | 31.0 | China (143.2), Hong Kong (27.0), Indonesia (57.7), Japan (97.7), Korea (18.0), Singapore (30.0), Best (18.0) |
| Cost (% of income per capita) | 26.6 | 28.8 | China (390.4), Hong Kong (1.4), Indonesia (357.0), Japan (0.0), Korea (38.3), Singapore (25.8), Best (0.0) |
| Reliability of supply and transparency of tariff index (0-8) | 8.0 | 8.0 | China (6.0), Hong Kong (8.0), Indonesia (6.0), Japan (8.0), Korea (8.0), Singapore (7.0), Best (8.0) |
| Registering Property (Rank) | 40 | 39 | China (42), Hong Kong (61), Indonesia (118), Japan (49), Korea (39), Singapore (19), Best (1) |
| Registering Property (DTF Score) | 76.29 | 76.32 | China (76.15), Hong Kong (69.79), Indonesia (55.72), Japan (73.91), Korea (76.34), Singapore (83.58), Best (94.46) |
| Procedures (Number) | 8.0 | 8.0 | China (4.0), Hong Kong (5.0), Indonesia (5.0), Japan (6.0), Korea (7.0), Singapore (6.0), Best (1.0) |
| Time (Days) | 13.0 | 13.0 | China (19.5), Hong Kong (27.5), Indonesia (27.4), Japan (13.0), Korea (5.5), Singapore (4.5), Best (1.0) |
| Cost (% of property value) | 3.4 | 3.3 | China (3.4), Hong Kong (7.7), Indonesia (10.8), Japan (5.8), Korea (5.1), Singapore (2.9), Best (0.0) |
| Quality of Land Administration Index (0-30) | 27.5 | 27.5 | China (18.3), Hong Kong (23.0), Indonesia (12.3), Japan (24.5), Korea (27.5), Singapore (29.0), Best (29.0) |
| Getting Credit (Rank) | 20 | 29 | China (62), Hong Kong (20), Indonesia (62), Japan (82), Korea (44), Singapore (20), Best (1) |
| Getting Credit (DTF Score) | 75.00 | 70.00 | China (60.00), Hong Kong (75.00), Indonesia (60.00), Japan (50.00), Korea (65.00), Singapore (75.00), Best (100.00) |
| Strength of Legal Rights Index (0-12) | 7.0 | 7.0 | China (4.0), Hong Kong (8.0), Indonesia (6.0), Japan (4.0), Korea (5.0), Singapore (8.0), Best (12.0) |
| Depth of Credit Information Index (0-8) | 8.0 | 7.0 | China (8.0), Hong Kong (7.0), Indonesia (6.0), Japan (6.0), Korea (8.0), Singapore (7.0), Best (8.0) |
| Credit Registry Coverage (% of adults) | 62.4 | 57.0 | China (91.1), Hong Kong (0.0), Indonesia (51.8), Japan (0.0), Korea (0.0), Singapore (0.0), Best (100.0) |
| Credit Bureau Coverage (% of adults) | 76.4 | 77.1 | China (21.3), Hong Kong (100.0), Indonesia (0.0), Japan (100.0), Korea (100.0), Singapore (65.7), Best (100.0) |
| Protecting Minority Investors (Rank) | 3 | 3 | China (123), Hong Kong (3), Indonesia (70), Japan (53), Korea (13), Singapore (1), Best (1) |
| Protecting Minority Investors (DTF Score) | 80.00 | 80.00 | China (45.00), Hong Kong (80.00), Indonesia (56.67), Japan (60.00), Korea (73.33), Singapore (83.33), Best (83.33) |
| Strength of Minority Investor Protection Index (0-10) | 8.0 | 8.0 | China (4.5), Hong Kong (8.0), Indonesia (5.7), Japan (6.0), Korea (7.3), Singapore (8.3), Best (8.3) |
| Extent of Conflict of Interest Regulation Index (0-10) | 8.7 | 8.7 | China (5.0), Hong Kong (9.0), Indonesia (5.7), Japan (7.0), Korea (7.0), Singapore (9.3), Best (9.3) |
| Extent of Shareholder Governance Index (0-10) | 7.3 | 7.3 | China (4.0), Hong Kong (7.0), Indonesia (5.7), Japan (5.0), Korea (7.7), Singapore (7.3), Best (8.3) |
| Paying Taxes (Rank) | 61 | 59 | China (131), Hong Kong (3), Indonesia (104), Japan (70), Korea (23), Singapore (8), Best (1) |
| Paying Taxes (DTF Score) | 79.2 | 79.31 | China (60.46), Hong Kong (98.69), Indonesia (69.25), Japan (77.03), Korea (86.56), Singapore (91.85), Best (99.44) |
| Payments (Number per year) | 9.0 | 13.0 | China (9.0), Hong Kong (3.0), Indonesia (43.0), Japan (14.0), Korea (12.0), Singapore (5.0), Best (3.0) |
| Time (Hours per year) | 164.0 | 118.0 | China (259.0), Hong Kong (74.0), Indonesia (221.0), Japan (175.0), Korea (188.0), Singapore (66.5), Best (55.0) |
| Total Tax Rate (% of profit) | 40.0 | 40.0 | China (68.0), Hong Kong (22.9), Indonesia (30.6), Japan (48.9), Korea (33.1), Singapore (19.1), Best (26.1) |
| Postfiling Index (0-100) | 64.3 | - | Hong Kong (98.6), Japan (92.6), Singapore (73.4), Best (98.5) |
| Trading across Borders (Rank) | 60 | 58 | China (96), Hong Kong (42), Indonesia (108), Japan (49), Korea (32), Singapore (41), Best (1) |
| Trading across Borders (DTF Score) | 82.38 | 82.38 | China (69.13), Hong Kong (88.94), Indonesia (65.87), Japan (86.43), Korea (92.52), Singapore (89.30), Best (100.00) |
| Time to Export: Border Compliance (Hours) | 48 | 48 | China (26), Hong Kong (19), Indonesia (53), Japan (23), Korea (13), Singapore (12), Best (0) |
| Cost to Export: Border Compliance (USD) | 321 | 321 | China (522), Hong Kong (282), Indonesia (254), Japan (265), Korea (185), Singapore (335), Best (0) |
| Time to Export: Documentary Compliance (Hours) | 10 | 10 | China (21), Hong Kong (1), Indonesia (61), Japan (2), Korea (1), Singapore (2), Best (1) |
| Cost to Export: Documentary Compliance (USD) | 45 | 45 | China (85), Hong Kong (57), Indonesia (139), Japan (60), Korea (11), Singapore (37), Best (0) |
| Time to Import: Border Compliance (Hours) | 72 | 72 | China (92), Hong Kong (19), Indonesia (99), Japan (40), Korea (6), Singapore (35), Best (0) |
| Cost to Import: Border Compliance (USD) | 321 | 321 | China (777), Hong Kong (266), Indonesia (383), Japan (299), Korea (315), Singapore (220), Best (0) |
| Time to Import: Documentary Compliance (Hours) | 10 | 10 | China (66), Hong Kong (1), Indonesia (133), Japan (3), Korea (1), Singapore (3), Best (1) |
| Cost to Import: Documentary Compliance (USD) | 60 | 60 | China (171), Hong Kong (57), Indonesia (164), Japan (100), Korea (27), Singapore (40), Best (0) |
| Enforcing Contracts (Rank) | 42 | 40 | China (5), Hong Kong (21), Indonesia (166), Japan (48), Korea (1), Singapore (2), Best (1) |
| Enforcing Contracts (DTF Score) | 66.61 | 66.61 | China (77.98), Hong Kong (72.57), Indonesia (38.15), Japan (65.26), Korea (84.15), Singapore (83.61), Best (84.15) |
| Time (Days) | 425.0 | 425.0 | China (452.8), Hong Kong (360.0), Indonesia (471.0), Japan (360.0), Korea (290.0), Singapore (164.0), Best (164.0) |
| Cost (% of claim) | 37.3 | 37.3 | China (16.2), Hong Kong (21.2), Indonesia (115.7), Japan (23.4), Korea (12.7), Singapore (25.8), Best (9.0) |
| Quality of Judicial Processes Index (0-18) | 12.0 | 12.0 | China (14.3), Hong Kong (11.0), Indonesia (7.8), Japan (7.5), Korea (14.5), Singapore (15.0), Best (15.5) |
| Resolving Insolvency (Rank) | 46 | 45 | China (53), Hong Kong (28), Indonesia (76), Japan (2), Korea (4), Singapore (29), Best (1) |
| Resolving Insolvency (DTF Score) | 62.49 | 62.49 | China (55.82), Hong Kong (75.06), Indonesia (46.46), Japan (93.34), Korea (89.22), Singapore (74.31), Best (93.89) |
| Recovery Rate (cents on the dollar) | 81.3 | 81.3 | China (36.9), Hong Kong (87.2), Indonesia (31.2), Japan (92.1), Korea (84.5), Singapore (88.7), Best (92.9) |
| Time (Years) | 1.0 | 1.0 | China (1.7), Hong Kong (0.8), Indonesia (1.9), Japan (0.6), Korea (1.5), Singapore (0.8), Best (0.4) |
| Cost (% of estate) | 10.0 | 10.0 | China (22.0), Hong Kong (5.0), Indonesia (21.6), Japan (4.2), Korea (3.5), Singapore (4.0), Best (1.0) |
| Strength of Insolvency Framework Index (0-16) | 6.0 | 6.0 | China (11.5), Hong Kong (9.0), Indonesia (9.5), Japan (14.0), Korea (14.0), Singapore (8.5), Best (15.0) |
Key Findings
- Ease of Doing Business Ranking: Malaysia ranked 23 in 2017, down by 1 from 2016.
- Distance to Frontier (DTF) Score: Malaysia scored 78.11 in 2017, down by 0.07 from 2016.
- Gender Dimension: The report includes gender-specific data for several indicators, such as starting a business, registering property, and enforcing contracts, highlighting potential differences in the regulatory burden for women.
- Paying Taxes: Malaysia improved in the postfiling component of the indicator, which includes tax refunds, audits, and appeals.
- Trading Across Borders: Malaysia’s DTF score for this area is 82.38, which is relatively high, but there is still room for improvement.
- Enforcing Contracts: Malaysia scored 66.61 in DTF, with a high time to enforce contracts (425 days) and moderate cost (37.3% of claim).
- Resolving Insolvency: Malaysia ranked 46 and scored 62.49 in DTF, with a recovery rate of 81.3 cents on the dollar and a resolution time of 1 year.
Comparative Analysis
- Malaysia is better than China and Indonesia but worse than Hong Kong, Japan, and Singapore in most areas.
- Hong Kong and Singapore are consistently the best performers in the report, with high DTF scores and low ranking positions.
- New Zealand is the best performer in several categories, including starting a business and protecting minority investors.
Methodology Notes
- The report includes gender dimensions in some indicators to better reflect the experiences of women entrepreneurs.
- Postfiling processes are now part of the paying taxes indicator.
- The distance to frontier score is used to measure the absolute distance to best practice, while the ease of doing business ranking reflects relative performance.
- The data for Malaysia is current as of June 1, 2016, except for the paying taxes indicators, which cover January–December 2015.
Conclusion
The Doing Business 2017 report highlights Malaysia's progress in some areas, such as paying taxes, but also identifies ongoing challenges in areas like starting a business, enforcing contracts, and resolving insolvency. The inclusion of a gender dimension adds nuance to the analysis, emphasizing the need for inclusive regulatory reforms. Overall, Malaysia has room for improvement, particularly in comparison to high-performing economies like Hong Kong, Singapore, and New Zealand.
试读结束,高清完整版pdf/doc/ppt,请点下载