世界发展银行-The-World_s-Bank-_-An-Evaluation-of-the-World-Bank-Group_rsquo_s-Global-Convening_165页_5mb
报告摘要
Summary of the World Bank Group's Global Convening Evaluation
Core Content
This evaluation, conducted by the Independent Evaluation Group (IEG) in 2020, assesses the World Bank Group's (WBG) ability to convene international partners on global development issues. It identifies the Bank Group's comparative advantages in convening and outlines opportunities for improvement in its effectiveness and strategic focus.
Main Points
-
Convening Defined: Convening is the process of bringing together relevant actors to act collectively on global or regional development challenges. It includes both leading and supporting roles in multilateral forums and partnerships.
-
Bank Group's Strengths:
- Strong global reach and country presence.
- Ability to work cross-sectorally.
- Central role in international development networks.
- Capacity for data and research (World Bank).
- Ability to channel funding and design innovative financial instruments (IFC).
-
Key Sectors of Convening:
- The World Bank is most active in health, finance, and climate change.
- IFC focuses primarily on private sector actors and business development.
-
Effectiveness Drivers:
- Favorable external context (demand, alignment with core goals).
- Clear objectives and sustained engagement.
- Strong internal capacities (resources, expertise, unified stance).
- Embedding topics in country programs and maintaining long-term presence.
-
Constraints to Effectiveness:
- Selectivity: The Bank Group struggles with defining and exiting convening initiatives, leading to a lack of focus.
- Resource Limitations: Budget constraints and limited staffing hinder the impact of convening efforts.
- Lack of Oversight: No formal system tracks or measures the effectiveness of convening initiatives.
- Global-Country Linkage: Some global initiatives fail to translate into meaningful country-level engagement.
Key Findings
- The Bank Group has strong convening power due to its global reputation and comparative strengths.
- Convening effectiveness is often tied to the alignment with strategic priorities, clear objectives, and long-term engagement.
- IFC demonstrates more focused and selective convening compared to the World Bank.
- Trust funds account for 64% of global engagement budgets, which can reduce accountability and selectivity in convening efforts.
- The Bank Group has the potential to improve its role as a convener by better managing its convening portfolio and aligning it with country programs.
Recommendations
1. Scope Convening Engagements More Deliberatively
- Establish formal and explicit selectivity criteria that cascade from the corporate level to individual vice presidential units and Global Practices.
- Criteria should include:
- Relevance to corporate priorities.
- Potential links to and support for country-level work.
- Whether the Bank Group’s role is based on its comparative strengths.
- Whether the convening leads to a clear public good or global collective action.
- Ensure clear goals and exit plans for major convening initiatives.
2. Enhance Oversight and Accountability
- Develop stronger internal systems to track, measure, and manage convening initiatives throughout their lifecycle.
- Implement periodic reviews of ongoing initiatives to assess relevance, effectiveness, and resource allocation.
- Promote timely exits where appropriate.
- Introduce self-evaluations for convening initiatives and Bank Group performance.
3. Improve Global-Country Linkage
- Consult with regional units more systematically when selecting global convening initiatives to better reflect country needs.
- Enhance country program assessments of progress and results on major global issues.
Key Information
- Scope of Evaluation: Focuses on the Bank Group's global convening role, excluding internal country-level convening.
- Methodology: Used a scorecard framework to evaluate convening across various dimensions, including demand, external efforts, internal capacities, roles, and outcomes.
- Global Convening Initiatives: Include efforts on global public goods (e.g., development data, business standards) and collective action issues (e.g., gender, climate change, fragile states).
- Challenges Identified:
- Lack of formal selectivity and exit processes.
- Insufficient resources and staffing.
- Weak oversight and accountability systems.
- Inconsistent global-country linkages.
Conclusion
The World Bank Group has strong convening power and plays a crucial role in addressing global development challenges. However, it has room for improvement in terms of selectivity, resource allocation, oversight, and alignment with country programs. Strengthening these areas could enhance the Bank Group’s impact and reputation as a global actor.
试读结束,高清完整版pdf/doc/ppt,请点下载