2023-05-23-亚开行-评估国家道路安全管理系统的成熟度(英)_50页_393kb
报告摘要
Summary of "Assessing the Maturity of National Road Safety Management Systems"
Core Content
This working paper by the Asian Development Bank (ADB) presents a maturity assessment framework for national road safety management systems, developed and tested as part of ADB's work in South Asia. The framework is based on the Safe System Approach, which emphasizes the need to design and manage road systems in a way that minimizes the harm caused by road crashes, even when they occur.
The study outlines a structured method to evaluate the maturity of road safety systems across three main elements: Results, Interventions, and Institutional Management Functions. These elements are further broken down into 15 dimensions, each with five levels of maturity: Vulnerable, Emerging, Developing, Maturing, and Advanced. The framework is designed to help ADB and its member countries identify strengths and weaknesses in their road safety systems and prioritize interventions accordingly.
Main Viewpoints
- Safe System Approach: This is the theoretical foundation of the framework. It focuses on systemic improvements rather than just individual behavior, aiming to reduce the severity of crashes through infrastructure, vehicle, and policy measures.
- Multi-level Maturity: The framework is not linear. Countries may exhibit varying levels of maturity across different dimensions, which can be assessed and used to guide targeted improvements.
- Strategic Prioritization: The maturity ratings help in identifying national priorities such as road safety data collection, speed management, safer roads, commercial transport safety, and protection of vulnerable users.
- Standardized Assessment: The framework provides a standardized way to evaluate road safety maturity, allowing for comparison across countries and regions in Asia and the Pacific.
Key Information
Assessment Framework
The framework includes the following three elements and 15 dimensions:
1. Results
- System level results
- Speeds
- Roads and roadsides
- Vehicles
- Road users
- Post-crash care
- Safe mobility (minimizing road use)
2. Interventions
- Speed management
- Safer roads
- Commercial transport safety
- Protection of vulnerable users
3. Institutional Management Functions
- Coordination
- Leadership and target setting
- Legislation
- Funding allocation
- Promotion and advocacy
- Monitoring and evaluation
- Research and development and knowledge transfer
- Lead agency role
Maturity Levels
| Level | Climate of Concern | Focus of Activity | Preparedness to Invest |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vulnerable | No concern climate | Accept that road trauma happens | Little or no government investment |
| Emerging | Blame climate | Prevent road trauma | Minor government investment but some appetite |
| Developing | Compliance climate | Develop road trauma prevention systems | Moderate government investment |
| Maturing | Systems climate | Improve trauma prevention systems | High government investment in multiyear programs |
| Advanced | Ownership climate | Integrate prevention systems into business | Investment levels directly linked to outcome targets |
Questionnaire
- A 65-question questionnaire was developed to test the framework across the 15 dimensions.
- Each question is rated on a 1–5 scale, based on three criteria: Standards, Compliance, and Resources.
- The questionnaire includes guidance and references to support responses and is intended for use by key stakeholders, including government agencies, private sector entities, and technical experts.
Application and Purpose
- The framework is used to baseline and monitor road safety capacity development.
- It helps ADB and its member countries target actions and identify the most beneficial next steps.
- The framework is part of ADB’s strategic Safe System approach and supports the Asia-Pacific Road Safety Observatory.
- It is relatively accessible to both technical and executive leadership due to its focus on specific actions, milestones, and policies.
Conclusion
The maturity assessment framework is a valuable analytical tool for identifying where countries stand in terms of road safety management. It supports strategic decision-making, capacity-building, and policy development. The framework is expected to become more refined and widely accepted as it is applied across more ADB member countries. It is also relevant to low- and middle-income countries in Asia and beyond, as it provides a clear, structured, and evidence-based approach to improving road safety systems.
试读结束,高清完整版pdf/doc/ppt,请点下载