EBA欧洲银行-IA_GL_71页_479kb

Impact Assessment Guidelines for EU Level 3 Committees Summary

Core Content

The Impact Assessment (IA) Guidelines for EU Level 3 Committees provide a structured approach to evaluating regulatory and supervisory policy proposals. These guidelines aim to support the L3 Committees (CESR, CEBS, and CEIOPS) in making informed, transparent, and accountable decisions by ensuring that policy proposals are based on sound analysis. The guidelines emphasize the importance of proportionality and flexibility in the IA process, distinguishing between Screening IAs and Full IAs depending on the complexity and significance of the issue at hand.

Main Steps in the IA Process

The IA process is structured into eight key steps:

1. Identification of the problem

   • Determine the nature of the problem and its impact on regulatory objectives.
   • Analyze market and regulatory failures using the framework in sections 1.3 and 1.4.
   • Assess whether the problem is likely to be resolved without new regulatory action.

2. Development of main policy options

   • Identify a range of policy proposals, including the "do nothing" and "market solution" options.
   • Ensure that all options are considered in the context of the regulatory objectives.

3. Definition of policy objectives

   • Link proposed policies to the broader regulatory objectives to justify interventions.
   • Ensure clarity in the purpose and expected outcomes of the policy.

4. Analysis of impacts

   • Evaluate the likely effects of each policy option, including side effects and unintended consequences.
   • Consider the cumulative impact of multiple policies and their interdependencies.

5. Comparison of options through net impact

   • Compare policy options based on their net impact (positive vs. negative effects).
   • Identify a preferred option while keeping in mind that IA is a decision-making aid, not a substitute for it.

6. Consultation on the draft policy proposal

   • Conduct formal and informal consultations with stakeholders.
   • Use the IA report to communicate the analysis to all relevant parties.

7. Publication of responses and feedback

   • Publish the results of the consultation and explain the rationale behind the final policy decision.
   • Include stakeholder feedback in the decision-making process.

8. Review of the policy after implementation

   • Keep the policy under review to ensure its effectiveness and relevance over time.
   • Consider conducting an ex-post IA if necessary.

Key Concepts

• Screening IA: A "light version" of IA used to quickly assess whether a full IA is needed. It is appropriate for discretionary work and helps determine the scale of the analysis.
• Full IA: A more detailed and comprehensive assessment of the policy's impacts, benefits, and costs. It is required for significant or complex issues.
• Proportionality: IA must be proportionate to the problem's significance, complexity, and uncertainty.
• Market and Regulatory Failures:
  • Market failure refers to inefficiencies such as information asymmetry, externalities, lack of competition, and public goods.
  • Regulatory failure occurs when existing regulations fail to address a problem effectively, leading to the need for new or revised policies.

IA Report Structure

The IA report should be clear, concise, and non-technical, with the following elements:

• A summary of the work conducted.
• Assumptions, uncertainties, and knowledge gaps.
• Use of Summary Tables (Section E) to present key findings.
• Technical details and supporting documents should be included in an appendix.

Summary Tables

• Table 1: Market/Regulatory Failure Analysis

  • Identifies the problem and its potential impact on the single market.
  • Assesses the nature of market and regulatory failures.
  • Evaluates whether the market can self-correct or if regulatory action is necessary.

• Table 2: Regulatory Policy Response

  • Outlines each policy option and its operational objective.
  • Explains how each policy option addresses the problem.
  • Indicates the preferred policy and any external bodies involved.

• Table 3: Benefits & Costs of Policy Options

  • Provides qualitative and quantitative descriptions of each option.
  • Includes monetary values (discounted where applicable).
  • Helps in comparing the net benefit of each policy.

• Table 4: Short and Long Term Impacts

  • Compares the net effects of policy options across time horizons.
  • Should include monetary values where possible.
  • Useful for assessing the overall effectiveness of the policy.

• Table 5: Scenario Analysis

  • Assesses the likelihood and impact of different scenarios.
  • Used when the costs and benefits of a policy cannot be determined with precision.
  • Categories: high, medium, and low.

• Table 6: Consultation and Review

  • Documents the consultation period and participation level.
  • Summarizes stakeholder reactions and feedback.
  • Indicates whether feedback resulted in policy changes and proposed review dates.

IA in Practice

• IA is a key tool for ensuring that policy decisions are based on evidence and analysis.
• It supports better regulation by making the process more transparent and accountable.
• The European Commission has adopted the principle of better regulation, which aligns with the IA approach.
• The L3 Committees are encouraged to use Screening IAs for initial assessments and Full IAs for more complex issues.
• IA should be integrated into the policy-making process from the beginning to ensure effectiveness and efficiency.
• The Consultative Panel and Working Groups play a role in providing external input during the IA process.

Conclusion

These guidelines offer a structured, proportionate, and flexible framework for conducting impact assessments at the EU Level 3 Committees. They aim to improve the quality of regulatory decisions, enhance transparency, and ensure that policies are justified based on sound economic and social science analysis. The use of Summary Tables and consultation procedures is emphasized to facilitate communication and decision-making.