2012-11-18-皮尤-More_Following_Fiscal_Cliff_Debate_than_Petraeus_Investigation_11页_547kb

报告摘要

Primary Findings from Pew Research Center Report on Petraeus Incident (November 2012)

Overall Interest: The report, based on a November 15-18, 2012 survey of 1,002 adults, found that interest in the Petraeus investigation was modest compared to other news stories. Both Republicans and Democrats showed similar levels of close follow (36% and 35% respectively), with slightly higher interest in the "fiscal cliff" debate.
Partisan Comparison: Republicans demonstrated stronger engagement in the Benghazi investigation (42% closely followed) and the Petraeus situation compared to Democrats (21% and 19%).
Public Reactions: The most frequent one-word reactions reported by survey respondents were "Surprise" (72%) and "Disappointment" (67%). Other common terms included "Shock," "Sad," and "Indifferent," while most respondents did not give other key reactions.
Importance Perception: Approximately 32% of Americans rated the Petraeus situation as very important to the nation, with a notable partisan divide where Republicans were more likely than Democrats (43% vs. 27%) to do so. This placed the incident as less impactful in public consciousness than the 1998 Clinton-Lewinsky scandal but more than the 2005 Libby indictment.
Comparative Analysis: Interest in the Petraeus investigation was lower than for the fiscal cliff debate and other scandals like the Benghazi attack. No significant gender gap was observed in interest or reactions.
Historical Context: The survey noted that while earlier scandals drew varied attention, the Petraeus incident saw more widespread concern than past events such as the 1987 Gary Hart scandal, but less than in 2005 or 1998.