2018年-CEPS欧洲政策研究中心_The_Macedonian_Crisis_and_Balkan_Security_26页_69kb

Summary of THE MACEDONIAN CRISIS AND BALKAN SECURITY (ESF Working Paper No. 2, July 2001)

Core Content

This working paper analyzes the Macedonian crisis and its implications for Balkan security, focusing on the interplay between internal and external factors, the role of international actors, and the broader European and global context. It highlights the shift in European involvement in the Balkans, the challenges of ethnic tensions and transnational crime, and the need for a systemic approach to regional stability.

Main Points

1. European Involvement in the Balkans

• The European Union (EU) has become a more active and influential actor in Balkan security compared to the 1990s, when its role was seen as ineffective.
• The EU’s systemic approach, including the CFSP (Common Foreign and Security Policy) and enlargement process, has increased its credibility and visibility in the region.
• The paper suggests that Europe’s interest in the Balkans is not just about individual states, but about the region as a whole, especially in the context of European integration and security.

2. The Macedonian Crisis and Its Causes

• The current crisis in Macedonia has both internal and external causes.
• Internal causes:
  • Economic transition has led to job losses among ethnic Macedonians, exacerbating tensions.
  • Ethnic Albanians feel marginalized and discriminated against, especially in terms of language rights and political representation.
  • The lack of meaningful reform and the failure to address these grievances have fueled discontent.
• External causes:
  • The unresolved status of Kosovo continues to influence the situation in Macedonia.
  • The 1999 withdrawal of UN forces from Macedonia, due to China’s stance, is linked to the resurgence of violence.
  • The UCK (Ushtria Çlirimtare e Kosovës) has not been supported by the Albanian state, which differentiates it from the Milosevic-era "Greater Serbia" movement.

3. Role of International Actors

• NATO and the US:
  • The US has played a key role in the crisis, particularly through its military presence in Kosovo and its diplomatic efforts.
  • There is a concern that the US may withdraw from the Balkans, potentially prompting a European withdrawal as well.
• EU:
  • The EU has taken a more structured and institutional approach, with figures like Javier Solana playing a central role.
  • The EU has been involved in facilitating political dialogue and supporting the reform process.
• Russia:
  • Russia has expressed a degree of Schadenfreude at the perceived failure of NATO’s policies in the Balkans.
  • The paper suggests that the international community, including NATO, may have inadvertently contributed to the instability in the region.

4. Transnational Crime and Security Challenges

• Transnational crime, particularly money laundering and organized crime, has played a significant role in the region.
• The paper emphasizes the need for stronger international cooperation to combat these issues.
• Law-and-order measures in Kosovo are essential, even if they conflict with the 'force protection' imperative.

5. The Future of Kosovo and Macedonia

• The unresolved status of Kosovo remains a critical issue for the stability of the region.
• The international community is urged to engage in serious talks between Pristina and Belgrade to resolve Kosovo’s final status.
• The paper argues that the risk to Balkan peace is not primarily from aggression but from secessionist movements that could trigger war.

6. Annex: Process of Ending Armed Conflict in Macedonia

• A detailed timeline of actions to end the conflict in Macedonia is outlined.
• Key steps include the cessation of hostilities, amnesty for UÇK personnel, release of political detainees, and the establishment of unarmed state institutions in conflict zones.
• The process is facilitated by the OSCE and involves cooperation between the Macedonian government and Albanian political leaders.

Key Information

• The Macedonian crisis is closely linked to the Kosovo issue, with both internal and external dynamics influencing the situation.
• The EU has emerged as a central player in the Balkans, with a more structured and institutional approach to security and integration.
• The UNC (United Nations) and NATO have played important roles in the region, but their presence and policies have been questioned.
• Transnational crime is a growing concern, particularly in areas with unclear legal status and political instability.
• The international community is urged to move from crisis management to conflict prevention, especially in the case of Kosovo.
• The Albanian-led reform agenda includes constitutional amendments, language rights, ethnic proportionality, and the transformation of the NLA into civilian roles.

Conclusion

The paper concludes that the Macedonian crisis is a complex issue requiring a comprehensive and systemic approach. It emphasizes the need for political dialogue, institutional reform, and international cooperation to ensure stability and security in the Balkans. The EU's role in this process is seen as crucial, and the paper suggests that the time has come to move beyond the 'Irgun scenario' of military intervention and toward a more sustainable and peaceful resolution.