战略与国际研究中心-Western-Hemisphere-Election-Study-Series_37页_183kb

1997 Mexican Midterm Elections Post-Election Report Summary

Core Content

The 1997 Mexican midterm elections, held on July 6, marked a significant turning point in the country's political landscape, signaling the end of the PRI's long-standing dominance in Congress and the emergence of a more pluralistic political environment. Managed by the Federal Electoral Institute (IFE), the elections were largely free of major incidents, reflecting the progress made in Mexico's democratization process. The IFE's commitment to transparency and credibility was evident, with the introduction of several reforms aimed at increasing fairness and reducing electoral fraud.

Main Points

• Electoral Reforms: The 1996 electoral reforms, led by President Ernesto Zedillo, were pivotal in creating a more level playing field. These reforms included:

  • Making the IFE fully independent from the government.
  • Introducing a 30/70 rule for campaign funding and media access.
  • Implementing a voter photo registration system to enhance credibility.

• Voter Turnout: The overall voter turnout was 57.6%, slightly lower than the 1994 presidential election (78%) but higher than the 1991 midterm elections (65.4%).

• Political Shifts:

  • The PRI lost its 68-year majority in the Chamber of Deputies, capturing only 39.1% of the vote.
  • The PAN and PRD emerged as the main opposition parties, with the PAN securing 26.6% and the PRD 25.7%.
  • The PRD gained 125 seats in the Chamber of Deputies, surpassing the PAN's 122 seats.
  • The PRI still held a majority in the Senate, but its influence in the lower house was significantly reduced.

• Key Outcomes:

  • Mexico City Mayoral Election: Cuauhtémoc Cardenas of the PRD won with 47.7% of the vote, marking the first direct election for the mayor of Mexico City.
  • Gubernatorial Elections: The PAN won two of six governorships, including the traditionally PRI stronghold of Querétaro. The PRI retained control over the remaining four states.
  • Political Maturity: The PAN's success in both gubernatorial and congressional elections indicates its growing maturity and ability to mobilize support across the country.

Key Information

• The PRI's decline was evident in both rural and urban areas, but particularly in urban centers.
• The PRD showed strong performance in central and southern states, with a focus on urban populations.
• The PAN gained traction in northern and central states, challenging the PRI's traditional dominance.
• The IFE played a crucial role in ensuring the integrity of the electoral process, which was widely perceived as fair.
• The Zapatista incident in Chiapas, where polling stations were burned, highlighted ongoing tensions and low political efficacy in the region.
• The electoral strategy of the PRD, particularly through Cardenas, was successful due to a combination of factors including protest voting, ideological appeal, and effective coalition-building.
• The PAN's poor performance in Mexico City was attributed to the choice of a less appealing candidate.

Prospects for Governance

• The shift in power is expected to lead to increased accountability and responsiveness from elected officials.
• The new political configuration may result in negotiations and coalitions between parties, both within and across branches of government.
• The democratization process is now more electorate-driven, with a clear trend of political pluralism.
• The future of U.S.-Mexican relations may be affected by the new Congress, which is less aligned with a single party line, potentially leading to more diverse and critical voices in political discourse.

Conclusion

The 1997 midterm elections represented a new era in Mexican politics and governability, characterized by a more competitive political environment and the potential for greater institutional checks and balances. While the PRI remains a dominant force, the rise of the PAN and PRD signals a shift toward a multi-party system. The success of these elections also raises questions about the stability of Mexico's democratic transition and its implications for political-economic development and international relations.

About the Author

Armand B. Peschard-Sverdrup is the author of this report. He acknowledges the contributions of Delal Baer and Sidney Weintraub, as well as the International Republican Institute for their support and collaboration in assessing the elections.

Tables Summary

Appendix Summary

The appendix details the electoral reforms from 1989-1990 and 1993-1994, which laid the groundwork for the 1996 reforms and contributed to the broader democratization of Mexico.