EBA欧洲银行-EBA-Rec-2013-04-Recommendations-on-asset-quality-reviews_17页_382kb
报告摘要
Summary of EBA Recommendations on Asset Quality Reviews
Core Content
The European Banking Authority (EBA) has issued recommendations to competent authorities across the European Union (EU) and the European Economic Area (EEA) to conduct Asset Quality Reviews (AQRs) on high-risk asset classes within credit institutions. These recommendations aim to promote consistency and uniformity in the evaluation of credit portfolios, including risk classification and provisioning, to ensure prudent capital levels and adequate risk coverage.
The EBA encourages competent authorities to identify and assess high-risk exposures, particularly in areas such as non-performing loans (NPLs), debt forbearance, collateral management, and provisioning levels. The process involves quantitative and qualitative analysis, and the results should be communicated to the EBA and colleges of supervisors for further coordination.
Main Objectives
- To support a more uniform approach in evaluating credit portfolios.
- To alleviate doubts about asset quality across the EU.
- To improve risk coverage and provisioning adequacy.
- To support EU-wide stress tests and bank restructuring efforts.
Key Recommendations
1. Scope and Application
- AQRs are required for credit institutions deemed relevant by competent authorities.
- The sample of banks is under the control of competent authorities but should include high-risk entities.
- The Single Supervisory Mechanism (SSM) and non-SSM Member States are involved in the process, with colleges of supervisors facilitating information exchange and coordinated action.
2. Review Process
- Competent authorities should review all relevant credit institutions' assets.
- The depth of the review depends on materiality and risk assessment.
- AQRs should be based on good practices outlined in Annex II.
3. Good Practices
- Data integrity and risk classification should be assessed first.
- Quantitative analysis includes:
- Exposure value
- Maturity
- Collateralisation
- Provisioning
- Coverage ratio
- Regional distribution
- Vintage analysis
- Major concentrations
- Qualitative analysis includes:
- Loan underwriting and monitoring practices
- Forbearance and NPL management
- Collateral evaluation and management
- Provisioning and risk coverage
- Materiality and risk assessment
4. Reporting Requirements
- Competent authorities must notify the EBA of their compliance status by 31 October 2014.
- Preliminary outcomes should be reported as soon as possible to support EU-wide stress tests.
- Reports should cover:
- Basic information about the banks
- Loan portfolio risk classification
- Forbearance and NPLs
- Arrears levels and resolution measures
- Risk coverage and provisioning levels
- Qualitative reporting may use a scoring system established by competent authorities.
5. Collaboration with Colleges of Supervisors
- Phase 1: Consolidating competent authorities inform the college of supervisors about the scope of the AQR and discuss asset selection.
- Phase 2: Host supervisors may be invited to nominate experts for the review.
- Phase 3: Results are shared with the college, and coordinated supervisory approaches are developed based on findings.
Implementation and Compliance
- The EBA Regulation (Article 16) requires competent authorities to comply with the recommendations.
- Non-compliance must be notified to the EBA by 23 December 2013.
- The EBA will draft a report summarising the main outcomes of AQRs, ensuring consistency across jurisdictions.
Competent Authorities
| Country | Competent Authority |
|---|---|
| Austria | Finanzmarktaufsicht (Financial Market Authority) |
| Belgium | National Bank of Belgium |
| Bulgaria | Bulgarian National Banks |
| Croatia | Hrvatska Narodna Banka (Croatian National Bank) |
| Cyprus | Central Bank of Cyprus |
| Czech Republic | Ceska Narodni Banka (Czech National Bank) |
| Denmark | Finanstilsynet (Danish Financial Supervisory Authority) |
| Estonia | Finantsinspektsoon (Financial Supervision Authority) |
| Finland | Finanssivalvonta (Finnish Financial Supervisory Authority) |
| France | Autorité de Contrôle Prudentiel (Prudential Control Authority) |
| Germany | Bundesanstalt für Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht (Federal Financial Supervisory Authority) |
| Greece | Bank of Greece |
| Hungary | Magyar Nemzeti Bank (Hungarian National Bank) |
| Ireland | Central Bank of Ireland |
| Italy | Banca d'Italia (Bank of Italy) |
| Latvia | Finansu un Kapitala Tirgus Komisija (Financial and Capital Market Commission) |
| Lithuania | Lietuvos Bankas (Bank of Lithuania) |
| Luxembourg | Commission de Surveillance du Secteur Financier (Commission for the Supervision of Financial Sector) |
| Malta | Malta Financial Services Authority |
| Netherlands | De Nederlandsche Bank (National Bank of Netherlands) |
| Poland | Komisja Nadzoru Finansowego (Polish Financial Supervision Authority) |
| Portugal | Banco de Portugal (Bank of Portugal) |
| Romania | Banca Națională a României (National Bank of Romania) |
| Slovenia | Banka Slovenije (Bank of Slovenia) |
| Slovakia | Narodna Banka Slovenska (National Bank of Slovakia) |
| Spain | Banco de España (Bank of Spain) |
| Sweden | Finansinspektionen (Swedish Financial Supervisory Authority) |
| United Kingdom | Prudential Regulation Authority |
| European Central Bank | - |
EEA-EFTA Competent Authorities
| Country | Competent Authority |
|---|---|
| Iceland | Fjármáelftirlitið (Icelandic Financial Supervisory Authority - FME) |
| Liechtenstein | Finanzmarktaufsicht - FMA (Financial Market Authority) |
| Norway | Finanstilsynet (Norwegian Financial Supervisory Authority) |
Conclusion
These recommendations are voluntary, but non-compliance must be reported to the EBA. They are designed to support existing supervisory efforts, enhance transparency, and improve risk management across the EU banking sector. The EBA aims to promote consistency and provide a framework for competent authorities to identify and address asset quality issues effectively.
试读结束,高清完整版pdf/doc/ppt,请点下载