2010-05-22-世界卫生组织-EMF_Project_-_International_Advisory_Committee_2010_9页_43kb

International EMF Project 15th IAC Meeting Summary (24-25 May 2010)

Core Content

The 15th International Advisory Committee (IAC) meeting of the International EMF Project took place in Bordeaux, France, from 24 to 25 May 2010. The meeting was organized by Dr Bernard Veyret and Dr Isabelle Lagroye, with Dr Emilie van Deventer serving as the chair and Dr Art Thansandote as the vice-chair. The main objectives were to review the current work plan, discuss recent research, and address policy and administrative matters related to electromagnetic fields (EMF) and health.

Main Viewpoints and Key Information

1. Project Structure and Funding

• The International EMF Project is supported by 60 national authorities and receives funding from external sources, including in-kind contributions like staff time.
• WHO audits the financial aspects of the project.
• The Project website will be updated more frequently due to Lisa Ravenscroft’s return.
• A questionnaire will be posted on the website to gather feedback from national authorities.

2. Collaborating Centres and International Organizations

• ARPANSA (Australia): Updating their ELF standard and reviewing RF literature since 2002.
• BfS (Germany): Preparing an EMF Ordinance with anticipated completion by late 2010.
• HPA (UK): Highlighted the government’s rejection of "corridor" options for powerline proximity. The WiFi project is nearing completion.
• ILO: Will not include RF diseases in its updated occupational disease list but will continue cooperation with WHO.
• COST BM0704 (Europe): Focused on multidisciplinary approaches, including "omics" testing and trust in science.
• EFHRAN (Europe): Published risk analyses using IARC-type classification.
• ICNIRP: Finalized new ELF guidelines, to be published in September 2010. A review of RF guidelines and a workshop on NIR and children are planned.
• IEEE/ICES: Developing standards on SAR measurement and modeling. Suggested collaboration with ICNIRP to address discrepancies in limit values.
• URSI: Preparing a white paper on wireless communication and health.

3. WHO Risk Management Tools

• Fact Sheets: Emphasized the importance of keeping them updated. A new fact sheet on hypersensitivity (no. 296) was suggested to include the nocebo effect.
• Base Station Fact Sheet: Will be revised after a review of recent studies.
• Local Authorities Brochure: Proposed a working group to review and update the brochure, which aims to help local authorities respond to public concerns.

4. Recent Research Updates

• Laboratory Studies: Limited studies on static and IF fields. Some ELF and RF studies showed effects on development and reproduction, but quality was insufficient.
• Epidemiological Studies: No association found between ELF and childhood brain tumors or leukemia. RF studies on children showed possible behavioral effects, but methodology needs improvement.
• Interphone Study: Results on meningioma and glioma were published; results on acoustic neurinoma and parotid gland tumors are pending. The COSMOS study will extend the investigation.

5. EMF Standards Database

• An updated interactive database is being developed to provide comprehensive, country-specific information on EMF standards.
• Feedback from countries highlighted the need for clear questions and vocabulary, and the inclusion of both national and regional policies can complicate the database.
• WHO is seeking input from the IAC and encouraging industry associations to share their data.

6. EMF Policy Issues

• US Experience (FDA): No centralized management of EMF; the FDA is involved in workshops and encourages research but does not fund it.
• European Commission:
  • Holding a scientific meeting in early 2011 to address uncertainties and gaps in knowledge.
  • Funding projects like Mobi-Kids and Seawind to study the ELF/childhood leukemia link.
  • Planning a consultative group to build trust and enhance public engagement.
  • Considering a revision of the 1999 recommendation to align with new ICNIRP ELF guidelines.
• PAVEL Project: Aims to improve policy responses to environmental health challenges. EMF is one of four case studies, noted for high public concern and uncertainty.

7. Administrative Matters

• Minutes of the previous meeting were accepted with minor corrections.
• A survey on the EMF Project will be posted on the website.
• Additional funding is needed for the development of the RF EHC monograph.
• The next IAC meeting may be combined with other EMF-related meetings, such as the ICNIRP/WHO/COST meeting on children in Slovenia.

Conclusion

The meeting emphasized the need for improved research quality, updated public information, and better coordination between international organizations and national authorities. It also highlighted the importance of addressing public concerns through transparent communication and policy alignment.