EBA欧洲银行-20110318-Public-QA-on-ST_6页_111kb

2011 EU-wide Stress Test Summary

Core Content

The 2011 EU-wide stress test, conducted by the European Banking Authority (EBA), is part of a broader supervisory framework aimed at evaluating the prudential soundness of individual banks and the resilience of the EU banking system as a whole. It is designed to simulate adverse economic conditions and assess how banks would perform under such scenarios.

Timeline

• Scenario and Methodology Development: The EBA began developing scenarios and methodologies in late 2010, building on lessons from the 2010 stress test.
• Methodology Release: On 18 March 2011, the EBA released its full methodology and scenarios to the public.
• Bank Participation: Banks were required to conduct the stress test in March/April 2011, with submission dates determined on a country-by-country basis.
• Result Submission: Results and supporting information were submitted to the EBA by 29 April 2011.
• Quality Assurance and Peer Review: Conducted in May 2011.
• EBA Board Review: The EBA Board of Supervisors reviewed and agreed on the results in early June 2011.
• Publication: Results were published in mid-late June 2011, on a bank-by-bank basis.

Key Participants

• EBA: Coordinating the stress test.
• National Supervisory Authorities: Guiding banks in the execution of the test.
• ESRB/ECB: Collaborating in the development of scenarios.
• European Commission: Involvement in the scenario design.
• EIOPA: Conducting parallel stress tests for insurance and occupational pensions.

Capital Assessment

• No Simple Pass/Fail: The stress test is not a pass/fail exercise. Results are evaluated in conjunction with other supervisory tools and the bank's overall risk profile.
• Core Tier 1 Capital: A more restrictive capital definition is used compared to 2010, focusing on core tier 1 capital.
• Capital Threshold: The capital threshold is more stringent than the previous year, with the exact criteria still under discussion to ensure consistency across the EU.
• Impact on P&L: The static balance sheet assumption and cost of funding assumptions significantly impact banks' profit and loss statements, reflecting a more severe scenario than in 2010.

Scenarios

• Timeframe: Scenarios cover the period of 2011–2012.
• Macro-Economic Scenarios: Developed in cooperation with the EU Commission and ESRB/ECB. These include a significant deviation from baseline forecasts, with a 4 percentage point cumulative GDP shock over two years in 2011 compared to 3 percentage points in 2010.
• Sovereign Risk: The scenario includes a significant sovereign stress, reflected in the price of sovereign debt and the cost of raising funds, but does not assume a specific sovereign default.
• Sovereign Bond Haircuts: The haircuts applied to sovereign bonds are based on the already reduced values from previous shocks, not the original values, making comparisons to CDS misleading.
• Focus on Eurozone Sovereign Risk: The EBA focuses on the eurozone sovereign crisis, as it is the most relevant risk. It does not incorporate recent events like oil price movements or the Japan earthquake.
• Scenario Consistency: The scenario is consistent across all EU countries, based on the ECB's EU-wide model agreed by national central banks.
• Liquidity Risk: Not assessed directly in the capital adequacy stress test, but the cost of funding is evaluated as part of the test, including the impact of sovereign stress on funding costs.

Additional Notes

• Static Balance Sheet Assumption: Banks must use a static balance sheet unless there are legally binding reasons to the contrary.
• Exemptions: The methodological note provides rules for exemptions from static balance sheet assumptions.
• Mitigation Plans: Banks are expected to submit mitigation action plans, and supervisory authorities will assess these along with the stress test results.
• Backstop Mechanisms: If capital shortfalls are identified, clear backstop mechanisms must be in place to address them.

Conclusion

The 2011 EU-wide stress test is a comprehensive exercise aimed at assessing the resilience of the banking sector under adverse conditions. It involves a detailed methodology, stringent capital requirements, and a focus on sovereign risk, all designed to provide a realistic view of banks' vulnerabilities and ensure consistent supervisory practices across the EU.