2014年-IMF国际货币组织全球_Surging_Investment_and_Declining_Aid_Evaluating_Debt_Sustainability_in_Rwanda_23页_492kb
报告摘要
Summary of "Surging Investment and Declining Aid: Evaluating Debt Sustainability in Rwanda"
Core Content
This IMF Working Paper, authored by Will Clark and Birgir Arnason, evaluates the macroeconomic implications of Rwanda's transition from a high reliance on foreign aid to a more sustainable financing model for public investment. The paper uses a dynamic general equilibrium model to analyze how different financing mechanisms and investment efficiency levels affect growth and debt sustainability in Rwanda, a low-income country with a strong record of economic growth.
Main Views and Key Information
1. Rwanda's Economic Context
- Rwanda has experienced rapid economic growth, averaging over 8.5% annually for the last 15 years.
- The country has made significant progress in reducing poverty, with the headcount poverty rate falling from over 60% in 2000 to below 45% in 2010.
- Despite this success, Rwanda remains a poor, landlocked country with a small export sector and inadequate infrastructure.
- The economy has historically been supported by substantial donor aid, which has accounted for about 40% of public expenditure and 10% of GDP.
2. Policy Objectives
- The Rwandan government aims to reduce its reliance on foreign aid while maintaining high public investment levels.
- A second-generation economic strategy is being developed to address challenges in sustaining growth and achieving middle-income status by 2020.
- The strategy includes:
- Increasing domestic resource mobilization through tax reforms.
- Rationalizing and reprioritizing government spending.
- Attracting foreign investment to diversify the private sector.
- Using external commercial borrowing in a manner consistent with debt sustainability.
3. Model Overview
- The model is a two-sector intertemporal general equilibrium framework designed for low-income countries.
- It incorporates the complementarity between public and private capital, and the role of public investment in boosting productivity and growth.
- The model is calibrated to Rwanda using the latest data and macroeconomic assumptions, including:
- A per capita potential growth rate of 4.7%.
- An initial public investment level of 13.4% of GDP.
- A tax-to-GDP ratio of 18% (initial VAT rate).
- A ratio of savers to non-savers of 1.5.
4. Financing Scenarios
The paper evaluates several scenarios for financing public investment in the context of declining aid:
- Baseline Scenario: Public investment and external grants decline over the next decade, leading to a fiscal gap that must be filled through tax increases. This results in a slowdown in growth to just over 3% and a contraction in private investment and non-traded output.
- Unconstrained Tax Adjustment: A significant increase in taxes is used to finance public investment, which allows for a higher growth rate but may be politically challenging.
- Commercial Borrowing: Public investment is financed through borrowing from international markets, which can help maintain high investment levels without a sharp tax increase. However, this increases the debt burden.
- Hybrid Financing: Combines commercial borrowing, additional concessional loans, and a constrained VAT adjustment. This scenario shows a more balanced approach to debt sustainability and growth.
- Reduced Grant Inflows with Hybrid Financing: A combination of lower aid and more efficient public investment leads to a more sustainable debt profile and higher growth.
5. Investment Efficiency and Debt Sustainability
- The efficiency of public investment (parameter
s) plays a crucial role in determining the sustainability of debt and the growth dividend. - Higher efficiency reduces the need for new tax revenue or borrowing, thus lowering the debt path.
- The model suggests that increasing investment efficiency is a key strategy to achieve both growth and debt sustainability without compromising fiscal solvency.
Conclusion
The paper concludes that Rwanda can sustain its high level of public investment while reducing its dependence on foreign aid through a combination of tax adjustments, commercial borrowing, and improved investment efficiency. The challenge for policymakers is to manage the timing and magnitude of fiscal adjustments to ensure that debt remains sustainable without causing undue hardship to the private sector and households.
Key Parameters and Values
| Parameter | Value | Definition |
|---|---|---|
| τ | 0.34 | Intertemporal elasticity of substitution |
| ε | 0.50 | Intra-temporal elasticity of substitution across goods |
| αx | 0.40 | Capital's share in value added – traded sector |
| αn | 0.55 | Capital's share in value added – non-traded sector |
| αk, αz | 0.50 | Cost share of non-traded inputs in the production of capital |
| δx, δn, δz | 0.05 | Capital depreciation rates |
| ρx | 0.32 | Distribution parameter – traded goods |
| ρn | 0.44 | Distribution parameter – non-traded goods |
| g | 0.047 | Trend per capita growth rate |
| ro | 0.02 | Initial real interest rate on domestic debt |
| rdc,o | 0.06 | Real interest rate on external commercial debt |
| Rz,o | 0.25 | Initial return on public investment |
| bo | 0.053 | Initial public domestic debt to GDP ratio |
| do | 0.119 | Initial external concessional debt to GDP ratio |
| Go | 0.086 | Initial grants to GDP ratio |
| Ro | 0.026 | Remittances to GDP ratio |
| Iz,o | 0.134 | Initial ratio of public investment to GDP |
| s | 0.60 | Efficiency of public investment |
| ho | 0.18 | Initial consumption VAT rate |
| a | 1.50 | Ratio of savers to non-savers |
试读结束,高清完整版pdf/doc/ppt,请点下载