战略与国际研究中心-Do-US_2页_324kb

KOREA CHAIR PLATFORM: Are U.S.-ROK Military Exercises Provocative?

Core Content

This document, authored by Victor Cha and published by the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), examines the impact of U.S.-ROK military exercises on the diplomatic relationship with North Korea (DPRK). Specifically, it analyzes the annual Ulchi Freedom Guardian (UFG) exercises and their potential to provoke North Korea.

Main Findings

The study conducted by the CSIS Korea Chair in March 2015 evaluates the effects of U.S.-ROK military exercises over a ten-year period (2005–2014). The key findings include:

• Null Effect: Military exercises do not significantly alter the overall U.S.-DPRK diplomatic relationship. The pre-exercise relationship status tends to remain consistent post-exercise, regardless of North Korean reactions.
• Split Personality: North Korea can separate its reactions to U.S.-ROK exercises from its inter-Korean relations. For instance, during 2005 and 2006, when South Korea had a progressive government, relations with North Korea remained positive despite hostile rhetoric toward the exercises.
• Length Matters: The duration of the exercises has increased since 2009, when they transitioned from short-term to multi-week events. This extension has led to a broader window for North Korean kinetic responses, particularly when pre-exercise relations are already negative.
• Rhetoric as Indicator: Pyongyang's official rhetoric during the exercise period is a reliable predictor of small-scale provocative actions. Therefore, Washington and Seoul should closely monitor North Korean statements to anticipate possible responses.

Key Information

• UFG Overview: The Ulchi Freedom Guardian is a computerized command-and-control exercise designed to simulate the defense against a North Korean invasion. It typically involves 50,000 South Korean troops and 30,000 U.S. soldiers.
• Key Resolve/Foal Eagle: These spring exercises are the largest combined and joint defensive training events in South Korea, often held in conjunction with UFG.
• North Korean Reactions: Despite the exercises, North Korea often uses them as a platform to issue aggressive rhetoric, which has led to accusations that the exercises are "provocative" and hinder diplomatic progress.
• CSIS Korea Chair Platform: The report is part of a series published by the CSIS Korea Chair, which aims to provide nonpartisan analysis on Korean policy issues.

Conclusion

While U.S.-ROK military exercises are a critical component of regional security and deterrence, their impact on North Korea's behavior is nuanced. The study suggests that these exercises do not inherently provoke North Korea, but rather reflect the existing diplomatic climate. However, the extended duration of exercises since 2009 has created more opportunities for North Korea to respond with provocations, particularly when relations are already strained. Therefore, monitoring North Korean rhetoric is essential for anticipating potential actions and managing the security environment on the Korean Peninsula.

Featured in

• TIME
• REUTERS
• Bloomberg
• THE WALL STREET JOURNAL
• The Washington Post

Author and Publisher

• Author: Victor Cha
• Publisher: CSIS Office of the Korea Chair
• Website: http://www.csis.org/program/korea-chair
• Note: CSIS is a nonpartisan, tax-exempt institution that does not take specific policy positions. All views expressed in this publication are solely those of the author(s).