战略与国际研究中心-PONARS-Policy-Memo-053_6页_83kb

Russia's Caspian Policy Under Primakov: Summary

Core Content

This document analyzes Russia's policy towards the Caspian Sea under the leadership of Prime Minister Yevgeniy Primakov, focusing on the geopolitical, economic, and environmental dimensions of its approach. It highlights the evolving nature of Russian strategy in the region, shaped by domestic challenges and international dynamics.

Main Viewpoints

1. Economic Realities and Energy Strategy

• Russia has shifted from a hardline geopolitical stance to a more pragmatic energy policy due to the financial crisis and domestic instability.
• The Caspian is still considered a valuable source of hydrocarbons, but expectations have been tempered by low oil prices, uncertain reserves, and the attractiveness of alternative investment opportunities.
• Russian companies are increasingly looking abroad, and the Caspian is seen as a "bird in the hand" due to its strategic importance.
• Despite uncertainties, Russia has increased its commitment to energy exports and is open to multiple pipeline routes, including to Black Sea ports.

2. Legal and Territorial Disputes

• Russia proposes a legal framework for Caspian seabed ownership, suggesting equal 20% blocs for each littoral state.
• This proposal is likely to be accepted by Iran but resisted by Azerbaijan and Turkmenistan, who fear it would hinder their pipeline projects.
• Russia opposes trans-Caspian pipelines, which would bypass its territory, but supports multiple pipelines, including those to Novorossiisk and Tuapse.
• The legal dispute has been postponed due to Russia's economic struggles, and Moscow is expected to adopt a flexible stance in negotiations.

3. Diplomatic Relations with Littoral States

• Russia maintains a close relationship with Iran, including cooperation on legal and environmental matters, and supports its nuclear energy ambitions.
• Russia is open to cooperation with Kazakhstan and Azerbaijan, particularly in infrastructure and pipeline projects.
• The Russian government has offered support to Azerbaijan through the Baku-Novorossiisk pipeline and other agreements.
• Turkmenistan's efforts to diversify pipeline access challenge Russian influence, but Gazprom's refusal to accept Turkmen gas has prompted Moscow to explore alternative transportation routes.

4. Environmental Concerns

• Environmental protection is a recurring theme in negotiations, but often serves as an instrument rather than a genuine concern.
• Russia opposes trans-Caspian pipelines on environmental grounds, yet supports the Blue Stream pipeline under the Black Sea without similar objections.
• There are real concerns about the impact of oil and gas extraction on the Caspian's environment and coastal communities.
• However, these concerns are often overridden by the interests of extractive and industrial elites.

5. Domestic Weaknesses

• Russia faces significant domestic challenges, including high transportation costs, lack of investment capital, and uncertainty over export routes.
• The devolution of political authority to regional governments weakens the federal government's ability to negotiate effectively.
• Existing pipeline routes through Chechnya and Dagestan are unreliable due to regional instability.
• The CPC pipeline project was delayed due to regional administrations' demands for transit fees.

6. Regional Isolation and TRACECA

• Russia is increasingly isolated in regional development projects, as TRACECA bypasses its territory.
• The failure to secure the Main Export Pipeline from Baku signals a loss of influence and economic opportunities.
• This exclusion fuels nationalist sentiments and undermines liberal and pragmatic political forces within Russia.

7. NATO Expansion and U.S. Involvement

• NATO expansion is perceived by many Russians as a direct threat to their influence in the region.
• U.S. military exercises and involvement in the Caucasus and Central Asia are seen as symbolic of Russia's weakness.
• There is fear that NATO's presence could lead to direct intervention in pipeline projects or support separatist movements.
• Some Russian liberals view NATO activities as non-threatening, but this is a minority perspective.

Key Information

• Legal Framework: Russia proposes a 20% seabed division, but is open to compromises.
• Pipeline Strategy: Supports multiple pipelines, including to Black Sea ports, but opposes trans-Caspian routes.
• Diplomatic Ties: Close with Iran, even-handed with Kazakhstan and Azerbaijan, and cautious with Turkmenistan.
• Environmental Stance: Mixed, with both genuine and strategic motives.
• Domestic Challenges: High transportation costs, lack of investment, and weak federal control over regional policies.
• Regional Isolation: TRACECA excludes Russia, and U.S. involvement is seen as a challenge to Russian influence.
• NATO and U.S.: Expansion is viewed as a threat, both directly and indirectly, to Russian security and economic interests.

Conclusion

Russia's Caspian policy under Primakov is characterized by pragmatism, flexibility, and a focus on energy cooperation. While the country faces domestic and economic challenges, it remains committed to increasing its involvement in Caspian energy projects. The policy emphasizes a mix of incentives and deterrents, particularly in relation to Iran and the other littoral states, and seeks to counter the influence of NATO and the U.S. in the region.