Summary of "Steel Road: Risks from RMB devaluation?"
Core Content
This report from Bank of America Merrill Lynch analyzes the potential risks to the Chinese steel sector from a RMB devaluation, exploring its impact on costs, earnings, and export margins. It also provides a global perspective on steel and iron ore valuations, supply-demand dynamics, and a scenario analysis based on a hypothetical 10% depreciation of the RMB.
Main Points
Risks from RMB Devaluation
- Negative Impact on Purchasing Power: A weaker RMB reduces the purchasing power of Chinese steel companies for USD-denominated raw materials, which account for approximately 50% of total costs. This significantly increases the cost of production in RMB terms, outweighing the benefits from USD revenue.
- FX Impact on Carry Trade: Companies that borrow in USD are negatively affected by RMB devaluation, leading to an increase in net gearing (debt-to-equity ratio) by 3-4% in RMB terms.
- EPS Impact: A 10% RMB devaluation could lead to a -12% to -88% decline in earnings per share (EPS), depending on the company's exposure to USD costs and revenues.
- Company-Specific Impact:
- Maanshan I & S is the most affected due to its low margin base and low USD export revenue.
- Baosteel is the least affected due to higher margin base and higher USD export revenues.
- Hengshi Mining, an iron ore company, would benefit from a weaker RMB as it could lead to higher iron ore prices in RMB terms.
Steel Margins Deterioration
- Steelmaker margins have deteriorated significantly due to weak demand and high production costs.
- Rebar producers are currently breakeven.
- HRC profitability (Hot Rolled Coil) has declined by -70% from its peak.
- The report downgrades several Chinese steel companies, including Baosteel PO by -10% after an analyst briefing.
Global Steel Price Forecasts
- US steel prices are lowered from $625/t to $580/t due to a weaker supply-demand outlook.
- EU steel prices are raised to EUR439/t from EUR418/t, as the weaker EUR could provide benefits.
- The US-China price spread has narrowed, while the EU-China price spread has returned to parity, which is a headwind for Chinese export margins.
Global Steel Valuations (Table 1)
| Company |
Mkt Cap (US$mn) |
EV (US$mn) |
P/E (CY) 2014 |
P/E (CY) 2015 |
P/E (CY) 2016 |
P/B 2014 |
P/B 2015 |
P/B 2016 |
ROE 2014 |
ROE 2015 |
ROE 2016 |
EV/EBITDA (CY) 2014 |
EV/EBITDA (CY) 2015 |
EV/EBITDA (CY) 2016 |
EV/t ($) 2015 |
DY 2015 |
| Greater China |
- |
- |
22.9x |
18.0x |
13.3x |
0.9x |
3% |
5% |
7% |
7.0x |
6.5x |
6.1x |
578 |
2.5% |
|
|
| Baosteel |
16,130 |
23,688 |
17.3x |
15.7x |
11.7x |
0.9x |
5% |
6% |
7% |
7.6x |
7.4x |
6.1x |
861 |
3.2% |
|
|
| Angang Steel |
5,376 |
7,643 |
25.3x |
17.0x |
12.3x |
0.7x |
3% |
4% |
5% |
5.2x |
5.3x |
5.1x |
334 |
1.5% |
|
|
| Maanshan I & S |
2,096 |
4,150 |
nm |
11.7x |
7.4x |
0.6x |
-1% |
5% |
7% |
5.1x |
4.0x |
3.7x |
208 |
3.1% |
|
|
| China Steel Corp |
12,910 |
22,086 |
19.4x |
19.4x |
18.6x |
1.4x |
7% |
7% |
7% |
10.6x |
10.4x |
10.2x |
1,372 |
4.1% |
|
|
| POSCO |
21,962 |
47,847 |
18.7x |
11.6x |
8.6x |
0.6x |
3% |
5% |
6% |
7.8x |
7.2x |
6.6x |
1,102 |
2.9% |
|
|
| Hyundai Steel |
7,048 |
18,552 |
10.1x |
9.2x |
8.3x |
0.5x |
6% |
6% |
6% |
7.6x |
7.5x |
7.5x |
668 |
1.1% |
|
|
| Dongkuk Steel |
467 |
4,804 |
nm |
nm |
nm |
0.2x |
-8% |
-9% |
-9% |
19.5x |
19.6x |
20.5x |
705 |
0.0% |
|
|
| Daido Steel |
1,731 |
3,076 |
13.8x |
10.5x |
8.6x |
0.8x |
6% |
8% |
9% |
8.2x |
6.9x |
6.2x |
n/a |
1.4% |
|
|
| Hitachi Metals |
7,169 |
9,373 |
18.7x |
12.9x |
11.9x |
1.9x |
12% |
14% |
13% |
9.7x |
7.7x |
6.6x |
n/a |
1.1% |
|
|
| Kobe Steel |
6,729 |
13,742 |
11.5x |
11.7x |
10.5x |
1.1x |
10% |
9% |
10% |
7.8x |
7.3x |
6.8x |
1,437 |
1.8% |
|
|
| NSSMC |
23,836 |
47,368 |
10.7x |
9.3x |
7.8x |
1.0x |
9% |
10% |
11% |
8.6x |
7.8x |
7.1x |
953 |
1.9% |
|
|
| Yamato Kogyo |
2,012 |
1,616 |
19.4x |
12.7x |
9.6x |
0.9x |
5% |
7% |
9% |
12.0x |
10.2x |
8.8x |
n/a |
0.9% |
|
|
| Nisshin Steel |
1,169 |
4,023 |
9.6x |
9.8x |
9.3x |
0.6x |
7% |
6% |
6% |
11.2x |
10.3x |
9.8x |
862 |
1.2% |
|
|
| SMM |
8,457 |
10,927 |
10.1x |
9.8x |
8.7x |
1.0x |
11% |
11% |
11% |
9.1x |
7.7x |
6.7x |
n/a |
3.1% |
|
|
| JSW Steel |
4,000 |
10,250 |
11.0x |
11.1x |
10.4x |
1.1x |
10% |
9% |
9% |
6.9x |
6.5x |
6.2x |
622 |
1.0% |
|
|
| Steel Authority |
5,296 |
9,960 |
13.5x |
12.2x |
12.0x |
0.7x |
6% |
6% |
6% |
11.5x |
9.5x |
8.0x |
622 |
1.7% |
|
|
| Tata Steel |
6,571 |
19,190 |
13.6x |
11.0x |
9.7x |
1.0x |
7% |
9% |
9% |
7.0x |
6.8x |
6.2x |
609 |
2.3% |
|
|
| Bluescope Steel |
2,246 |
3,059 |
22.6x |
17.5x |
13.8x |
0.7x |
3% |
4% |
5% |
6.2x |
5.6x |
5.1x |
609 |
1.2% |
|
|
| Arrium |
455 |
1,238 |
nm |
nm |
215.5x |
0.2x |
2% |
-2% |
0% |
3.7x |
4.7x |
4.4x |
456 |
0.0% |
|
|
| Sims MM |
1,828 |
1,797 |
26.4x |
17.1x |
14.6x |
1.2x |
5% |
7% |
8% |
8.3x |
6.4x |
5.6x |
n/a |
2.7% |
|
|
| ArcelorMittal |
17,046 |
40,746 |
58.8x |
31.2x |
15.0x |
0.34x |
3% |
1% |
2% |
5.6x |
5.8x |
5.2x |
342 |
2.1% |
|
|
| ThyssenKrupp AG |
14,529 |
27,138 |
403.0x |
17.3x |
11.4x |
4.15x |
17% |
23% |
28% |
9.5x |
8.1x |
7.1x |
1,809 |
2.1% |
|
|
| Voesalpine |
6,217 |
11,306 |
13.3x |
12.3x |
10.3x |
1.07x |
8% |
9% |
10% |
7.1x |
6.8x |
6.4x |
1,359 |
3.0% |
|
|
| SSAB |
2,723 |
5,583 |
nm |
nm |
16.3x |
0.55x |
0% |
3% |
3% |
11.4x |
8.1x |
7.7x |
603 |
3.8% |
|
|
| Salzgilter |
1,425 |
3,763 |
144.1x |
22.9x |
11.3x |
0.39x |
0% |
2% |
3% |
7.7x |
6.7x |
5.7x |
453 |
1.3% |
|
|
| Nucor |
1,583 |
2,367 |
13.6x |
9.7x |
9.1x |
1.2x |
9% |
12% |
11% |
5.8x |
5.1x |
5.0x |
493 |
3.6% |
|
|
| Steel Dynamics |
4,280 |
5,992 |
13.1x |
9.3x |
8.2x |
1.4x |
12% |
15% |
17% |
6.9x |
5.0x |
4.7x |
n/a |
10.4% |
|
|
| US Steel |
3,082 |
6,443 |
6.0x |
20.3x |
30.4x |
0.8x |
14% |
4% |
2% |
7.1x |
6.4x |
6.8x |
n/a |
0.9% |
|
|
| Reliance Steel |
4,112 |
6,137 |
11.3x |
9.2x |
7.2x |
1.0x |
9% |
10% |
12% |
7.2x |
6.2x |
5.3x |
n/a |
2.6% |
|
|
| Allegheny Tech |
3,010 |
5,574 |
nm |
11.6x |
7.2x |
1.1x |
0% |
9% |
14% |
19.7x |
8.1x |
6.0x |
n/a |
2.6% |
|
|
Global Iron Ore Valuations (Table 2)
| Company Name |
Market Cap (US$mn) |
PER 2014 |
PER 2015 |
2016 |
EV/EBITDA 2014 |
EV/EBITDA 2015 |
EV/EBITDA 2016 |
FCF Yield 2014 |
FCF Yield 2015 |
FCF Yield 2016 |
P/NPV 2015 |
| Hengshi |
461 |
9.7x |
18.6x |
47.2x |
5.1x |
8.1x |
14.0x |
-0.5% |
-5.9% |
-3.1% |
0.8x |
| IRC |
333 |
NM |
NM |
NM |
NM |
545.4x |
22.3x |
-40.4% |
-12.3% |
-39.7% |
0.7x |
| Vale ON |
38,654 |
26.1x |
49.2x |
19.4x |
5.8x |
8.3x |
7.6x |
-3.2% |
-6.6% |
-3.6% |
0.7x |
| Rio Tinto |
80,715 |
9.9x |
16.9x |
17.9x |
5.7x |
7.8x |
7.9x |
3.0% |
3.9% |
4.5% |
0.8x |
| Fortescue Metals |
5,052 |
3.0x |
11.5x |
NM |
3.1x |
6.0x |
8.8x |
49.9% |
9.3% |
7.0% |
n/a |
| Kumba |
5,950 |
6.9x |
11.1x |
12.7x |
3.6x |
5.2x |
5.6x |
11.4% |
1.9% |
4.1% |
0.8x |
| Cliffs Natural |
1,041 |
NM |
NM |
NM |
9.3x |
11.4x |
12.0x |
0.1% |
14.4% |
10.0% |
1.6x |
| Ferrexpo |
489 |
2.9x |
28.5x |
NM |
3.3x |
7.3x |
9.7x |
19.3% |
1.2% |
-12.1% |
0.5x |
| African Rainbow Mins |
2,311 |
6.7x |
13.5x |
15.2x |
12.0x |
16.3x |
12.1x |
8.3% |
5.1% |
7.5% |
0.9x |
| BHP Billiton PLC |
114,673 |
9.7x |
19.1x |
28.2x |
4.6x |
6.9x |
7.8x |
7.1% |
3.0% |
3.0% |
0.7x |
| Anglo American |
21,229 |
11.7x |
18.2x |
12.4x |
4.9x |
6.0x |
5.3x |
1.6% |
0.0% |
8.5% |
0.5x |
| Sesa Sterlite |
10,008 |
8.8x |
12.2x |
14.6x |
6.3x |
5.5x |
5.8x |
19.7% |
11.5% |
13.6% |
0.9x |
| African Minerals |
50 |
NM |
NM |
NM |
429.6x |
15.4x |
4.7x |
-467.2% |
-429.9% |
6.6% |
-0.3x |
| Atlas Iron Limited |
117 |
30.7x |
NM |
NM |
1.1x |
-20.6x |
-4.9x |
-66.3% |
-69.3% |
-114.8% |
n/a |
Supply-Demand Model (Table 3)
| Metric |
2008 |
2009 |
2010 |
2011 |
2012 |
2013 |
2014 |
2015 |
2016 |
2017 |
2018 |
2019 |
2020 |
| China Pig Iron Output |
470.7 |
543.7 |
590.2 |
629.7 |
657.9 |
709.0 |
740.2 |
763.2 |
776.0 |
781.2 |
796.0 |
809.2 |
800.9 |
| China Crude Steel Production |
503.1 |
572.2 |
637.2 |
685.3 |
723.9 |
779.0 |
813.3 |
838.7 |
857.4 |
877.7 |
904.4 |
930.0 |
942.2 |
| % YoY Growth |
2.8% |
13.7% |
11.4% |
7.5% |
5.6% |
7.6% |
8.4% |
4.1% |
3.5% |
3.3% |
3.1% |
1.3% |
|
| Per Capita Output of Steel (kg) |
380 |
430 |
476 |
510 |
473 |
511 |
512 |
530 |
547 |
558 |
574 |
590 |
597 |
| China Finished Steel Production |
469.4 |
545.2 |
605.8 |
651.6 |
688.0 |
741.6 |
772.6 |
796.7 |
814.6 |
833.8 |
859.2 |
883.5 |
895.1 |
| Net Exports |
-43.8 |
-7.0 |
-26.1 |
-33.3 |
-42.2 |
-48.3 |
-73.0 |
-66.9 |
-59.3 |
-53.7 |
-55.3 |
-56.9 |
-58.6 |
| China Net Finished Steel Production |
425.6 |
538.2 |
579.7 |
618.3 |
645.9 |
693.3 |
699.6 |
729.9 |
755.3 |
780.1 |
804.0 |
826.6 |
836.4 |
| China Demand for Finished Steel from Crude |
423.6 |
533.9 |
569.1 |
615.6 |
639.4 |
693.0 |
699.1 |
727.5 |
753.2 |
778.0 |
802.0 |
824.7 |
835.5 |
| % YoY Growth |
3.0% |
26.1% |
6.6% |
8.2% |
3.9% |
8.4% |
0.9% |
4.1% |
3.5% |
3.3% |
3.1% |
1.3% |
|
| Installed Base of Finished Steel (tonnes/capita) |
3.32 |
3.72 |
4.14 |
4.58 |
5.04 |
5.52 |
5.99 |
6.50 |
7.02 |
7.49 |
8.05 |
8.63 |
9.22 |
| Net Capacity Additions/Closures |
33.7 |
73.8 |
82.5 |
63.0 |
96.7 |
27.0 |
18.2 |
28.3 |
18.4 |
3.5 |
32.2 |
- |
|
| Average Utilization Rate of Crude Steel |
80% |
84% |
84% |
82% |
79% |
80% |
82% |
82% |
82% |
83% |
84% |
- |
|
| Domestic Demand vs Domestic Capacity |
71% |
79% |
76% |
75% |
71% |
74% |
73% |
74% |
76% |
78% |
78% |
- |
|
Scenario Analysis (Table 4)
| Company |
Earnings Impact on USD Costs |
Earnings Impact on USD Revenues |
Total Net Impact to Earnings |
% of Debt in USD |
Increase in Net Gearing from USD Debt |
| Baosteel |
-14% |
2% |
-12% |
60% |
4% |
| Angang |
-55% |
1% |
-54% |
ND |
ND |
| Maanshan |
-89% |
1% |
-88% |
26% |
3% |
| Hengshi Mining |
0% |
37% |
37% |
0% |
0% |
Mark to Market Model (Table 5)
| Company |
Base Case EBITDA (US$mn) |
Base Case EPS |
Base Case EV/EBITDA |
Base Case PER |
Spot EBITDA (US$mn) |
Spot EPS |
Spot EV/EBITDA |
Spot PER |
% Chg EBITDA vs BofAML |
% Chg EPS vs BofAML |
% Chg EBITDA vs Consensus |
% Chg EPS vs Consensus |
| Baosteel |
19,396 |
0.35 |
7.6x |
17.3x |
14,806 |
0.15 |
10.0x |
41.4x |
-24% |
-58% |
-29% |
-63% |
| Angang |
9,164 |
0.18 |
5.2x |
25.3x |
5,102 |
-0.25 |
9.4x |
-18.4x |
-44% |
-238% |
-31% |
-256% |
| Maanshan |
5,065 |
-0.02 |
5.1x |
NM |
4,876 |
-0.04 |
5.3x |
NM |
-4% |
NM |
-2% |
NM |
| China Steel Corp |
64,956 |
1.38 |
10.6x |
19.4x |
50,467 |
0.96 |
13.7x |
27.8x |
-22% |
-30% |
-29% |
-29% |
| Hengshi |
563 |
0.22 |
4.6x |
8.8x |
170 |
0.10 |
15.1x |
18.5x |
-70% |
-70% |
-53% |
-53% |
| IRC |
-98 |
-0.01 |
NM |
NM |
-104 |
-0.01 |
NM |
NM |
NM |
NM |
NM |
NM |
Key Takeaways
- RMB Devaluation Impact: Chinese steel companies are negatively affected by RMB devaluation, especially due to USD-denominated costs and carry trade FX exposure.
- Company-Specific Impact:
- Baosteel is the least affected due to higher margins and higher USD export revenues.
- Maanshan is the most affected due to lower margins and low USD export revenue.
- Hengshi Mining benefits from RMB devaluation, as iron ore prices increase in RMB terms.
- Steel Margins: Steel margins have deteriorated significantly, with rebar producers currently breakeven and HRC profitability down 70% from the peak.
- Global Steel Valuations: There are significant differences in valuations across regions, with Greater China and Asia-Pacific showing lower valuations compared to Europe and North America.
- Scenario Analysis: A 10% RMB devaluation leads to significant EPS declines for most Chinese steel companies, with Hengshi Mining being a notable exception.
- Mark to Market Model: The mark to market scenario shows declines in EBITDA and EPS for most steel companies, with Hengshi Mining also showing significant declines.
- Pricing Trends: Steel and iron ore prices are fluctuating, with US prices being lowered and EU prices being raised. The US-China price spread has narrowed, which is a headwind for Chinese steel exports.
Conclusion
The report highlights the risks of RMB devaluation to the Chinese steel sector, particularly due to USD-denominated costs and carry trade FX exposure. It also provides a global perspective on steel and iron ore valuations, showing significant differences across regions. The scenario analysis and mark to market model indicate significant negative impacts on earnings, with Hengshi Mining being a positive outlier. The steel margins have deteriorated, and the steel demand is weak. The report suggests caution for investors in the steel sector due to the potential for further declines in earnings and profitability.