2018-摩尔多瓦共和国的气候服务（英文版）

Summary of the National Consultation Workshop on the National Framework for Climate Services in the Republic of Moldova

Core Content and Purpose

The National Consultation Workshop on the National Framework for Climate Services (NFCS) in the Republic of Moldova took place from 26–27 June 2018 at the Radisson Blu Hotel in Chisinau. The event was organized and funded by the World Bank, with support from the Zoi Environment Network, the State Hydrometeorological Service (SHS), and the World Meteorological Organization (WMO). The main goal was to bring together climate information producers and users with international experts and organizations to discuss the development of climate services in Moldova and identify gaps and needs.

The workshop aimed to:

• Foster dialogue between users and producers of climate-related information.
• Share international experiences and perspectives on climate services.
• Collect feedback and develop recommendations for the NFCS conceptual outline.
• Promote the visibility of climate services to decision-makers and the public.
• Improve the delivery, accessibility, and relevance of climate information.

Main Participants and Stakeholders

Over 70 participants attended the workshop, representing:

• National, local, and regional authorities (including Chisinau, Gagauzia, Transnistria, and rural areas).
• NGOs (such as EcoContact, ACSA, and others).
• Academia and research institutions.
• Private sector entities (e.g., agricultural associations, energy efficiency agencies).
• Media representatives.

Key Discussion Areas and Recommendations

Priority Area 1: Bring in the Users

• User engagement is critical for the development of high-quality climate services.
• Tailored approaches are needed to meet the diverse needs of different user groups.
• Regular dialogue using a mix of online tools (surveys, feedback forms) and offline methods (seminars, training) is recommended.
• Face-to-face meetings should be held several times a year, focusing on sector-specific issues.
• Transparency about the cost and accessibility of climate services is essential to build trust and encourage usage.

Priority Area 2: Shaping Governance & Sustainability

• There is currently no official leading agency for climate-related services in Moldova.
• The SHS is the main responsible body for coordination and delivery of climate information.
• Legal and normative framework needs to be strengthened to define roles, responsibilities, and data exchange procedures.
• Financial sustainability should be ensured through state funding and a sliding payment scale for private users.
• Certification and standardization of data exchange between SHS and external providers is necessary.
• Re-establishing dialogue with academia is important to address the lack of qualified specialists in the hydrometeorological sector.

Priority Area 3: Providing Seamless Services

• Different user groups require different types and scales of information.
• Short-term forecasts are the direct responsibility of the SHS.
• Long-term climate information should involve other organizations and stakeholders.
• Improved communication and education are needed to raise awareness about the value and uses of climate services.
• Local promotions and mass media outreach should be strengthened to ensure broader access and understanding.

Priority Area 4: Addressing Priority Sectors

• The GFCS priority sectors are considered relevant in Moldova.
• Agriculture and food security, forestry, biodiversity, health, alternative energy, transport and infrastructure, and disaster risk reduction were identified as key sectors.
• Tailored climate products should be developed for these sectors.
• Legal requirements should be strengthened in building codes and project regulations to ensure climate-proofing of new developments.
• Insurance industry needs should also be explored.

Priority Area 5: Ensuring Visibility to Decision Makers

• Decision-makers and mass media are key target groups for communication.
• Information campaigns and evidence-based approaches are recommended to improve awareness and support.
• Adequate financing is necessary to sustain such initiatives.
• Participatory and interactive methods like roundtables and training should be used to engage users and stakeholders.

Workshop Content and Activities

• Presentations covered the status quo, gaps, and needs in Moldova’s climate information system.
• Breakout groups were used to discuss the conceptual outline of the NFCS.
• A blitz poll was conducted to gather immediate feedback from participants.
• A media roundtable was held to improve communication between SHS and mass media.
• The agenda included sessions on:
  • International perspectives on climate services.
  • Climate and hydrometeorological information in Moldova.
  • User needs and expectations.
  • Governance and sustainability.
  • Priority sectors and visibility to decision-makers.

Results and Feedback

• 73% of participants rated the workshop as "very good".
• 71% of those who evaluated the event expressed interest in follow-up activities.
• The highest satisfaction was with breakout group discussions and plenary sessions.
• Logistics were highly appreciated, with 41% rating them as "good" and 59% as "very good".
• Feedback highlighted the need for:
  • More practical information over scientific jargon.
  • Improved user engagement and awareness.
  • Enhanced data accessibility and communication with users.
  • Strengthened legal and financial frameworks.

Annexes and Supporting Documents

• Annex 1: Workshop agenda, including sessions for both the consultation and media roundtable.
• Annex 2: List of participants, including representatives from government, NGOs, academia, and media.
• Annex 3: Summary of breakout group discussions, highlighting recommendations across different areas.
• Annex 4: Results of the blitz poll, showing user satisfaction and preferences for information types and delivery methods.
• Annex 5: Recommendations from the media roundtable on improving SHS-media interactions.
• Annex 6: Detailed feedback from participants on the workshop's effectiveness and content.

Conclusion

The workshop emphasized the importance of user-centered approaches, intersectoral cooperation, and legal and financial frameworks in the development of the National Framework for Climate Services in Moldova. It provided a platform for collaboration between national and international stakeholders, and laid the groundwork for future climate service improvements and policy development.