战略与国际研究中心-Update-on-the-US-Withdrawal-From-Iraq_16页_549kb
报告摘要
Summary of the U.S. Withdrawal from Iraq
Core Content
The document provides an update on the U.S. military withdrawal from Iraq, highlighting the transition from a combat mission to a more civilian-focused strategic partnership. It outlines the reduction in U.S. troop numbers, the role of remaining forces, the shift in equipment and base management, and the broader U.S. engagement in Iraq through civil and economic programs.
Main Points
-
U.S. Troop Reduction:
By August 31, 2010, the U.S. completed its combat mission in Iraq, reducing troop numbers from 144,000 in January 2009 to 50,000. The transition force will be known as Operation New Dawn and is expected to fully withdraw by the end of 2011. -
Nature of the New Mission:
The U.S. commitment has shifted from a combat mission to a civilian-led one, focusing on advising, assisting, and training Iraqi Security Forces (ISF), conducting counter-terrorism operations, and supporting Provincial Reconstruction Teams (PRTs). -
Equipment Reduction:
The total number of U.S. military equipment in Iraq dropped from 3.4 million in January 2009 to 1.2 million by the end of 2010. The equipment is being repatriated to U.S. forces in Afghanistan, replenished U.S. stocks, and transferred to the ISF. -
Base Closure and Transfer:
The number of U.S. bases in Iraq was reduced from 357 in 2009 to 92 in 2010, with 58 being partnered with the Iraqi government. -
Strategic Framework Agreement:
A key document guiding the U.S.-Iraq partnership, the Strategic Framework Agreement outlines areas of cooperation, including education, energy, trade, law enforcement, and more. -
Levels of Violence:
Despite an ongoing insurgent presence, violence levels in Iraq have significantly decreased since the peak of the conflict. The Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) reported that attacks against Iraqi authorities and civilian casualties have reached historic lows. -
Civil Aid and Economic Support:
The U.S. continues to support Iraq through civil and economic aid, with a shift from large infrastructure projects to technical assistance and capacity-building programs. The number of PRTs is expected to decrease, but the focus remains on strengthening Iraqi institutions. -
U.S. Civilian Engagement:
Multiple U.S. government agencies are involved in supporting Iraq's development in various sectors, including agriculture, trade, energy, health, and justice.
Key Areas of U.S. Civilian Engagement with Iraq
| Sector | Key Activities |
|---|---|
| Agriculture | USDA provides technical assistance, training, and promotes U.S. agricultural exports. |
| Commerce/Trade | The Department of Commerce facilitates business exchanges and supports trade missions. |
| Culture | The Department of State works on cultural heritage projects and training. |
| Economics | The Treasury supports financial management, while USAID promotes microfinance and economic diversification. |
| Education | The Fulbright program supports Iraqi students and scholars in the U.S. |
| Energy | The Department of Energy aids in electricity regulation, oil and gas management, and renewable energy planning. |
| Health | HHS and CDC collaborate on mental health, epidemiology, and medical resource sharing. |
| Homeland Security | DHS supports border security, customs operations, and the repatriation of cultural artifacts. |
| Interior | The Department of Interior assists in oil and gas management and international networking. |
| Justice | The Department of Justice supports the establishment of the Iraqi High Tribunal and legal reforms. |
U.S. Forces Remaining in Iraq
-
Structure and Role:
The remaining U.S. forces are organized into six Advisory and Assistance Brigades (AABs) and retain the right to self-defense. They focus on advising, assisting, and training the ISF, as well as conducting counterterrorism missions. -
Future Plans:
The U.S. Army plans to maintain a force of 50,000 in Iraq for stability operations and partnered counterterrorism efforts through 2011, after which all U.S. forces are expected to leave.
Department of Defense and Army Reporting
- The Department of Defense emphasizes that the U.S. commitment to Iraq remains strong, albeit in a different form.
- The drawdown reflects a successful transition, with many troops and equipment redeployed to Afghanistan and the U.S.
- The Army has structured AABs for stability operations, distinct from traditional combat units.
Importance of the Transition
- The shift to a civilian-led partnership underscores the U.S. goal of fostering a stable, sovereign Iraq.
- It reflects confidence in the ISF's growing capabilities and the broader strategic objective of long-term partnership.
Conclusion
The U.S. withdrawal from Iraq marks a significant strategic shift, emphasizing a transition from military to civilian engagement. This move is intended to support Iraq's development and security while maintaining a strong partnership. The reduction in troop and equipment numbers, combined with a focus on capacity-building and technical assistance, illustrates a comprehensive and long-term approach to U.S.-Iraq relations.
试读结束,高清完整版pdf/doc/ppt,请点下载