EBA欧洲银行-DE_EFHQAFG69S4HKHLIZA14_16页_3mb
报告摘要
2014 EU-wide Stress Test Summary for WGZ Bank AG
Core Information
- Bank Name: DE - WGZ Bank AG Westdeutsche Genossenschafts-Zentralbank
- LEI Code: EFHQAFG69S4HKHLIZA14
- Test Period: 2014 EU-wide Stress Test
- Reporting Date: 31 December 2013
- Test Outcomes: As of 31 December 2016
Key Figures
Actual Figures (as of 31 December 2013)
- Operating profit before impairments: 183 million EUR
- Impairment losses on financial and non-financial assets in the banking book: 63 million EUR
- Common Equity Tier 1 (CET1) capital: 2,225 million EUR
- Total Risk Exposure: 22,228 million EUR
- CET1 ratio: 10.0%
Outcome of Adverse Scenario (as of 31 December 2016)
- 3-year cumulative operating profit before impairments: 414 million EUR
- 3-year cumulative impairment losses on financial and non-financial assets in the banking book: 555 million EUR
- 3-year cumulative losses from the stress in the trading book: 428 million EUR
- Valuation losses due to sovereign shock after tax and prudential filters: 26 million EUR
- CET1 capital: 1,837 million EUR
- Total Risk Exposure: 25,324 million EUR
- CET1 ratio: 7.3%
Outcome of Baseline Scenario (as of 31 December 2016)
- 3-year cumulative operating profit before impairments: 630 million EUR
- 3-year cumulative impairment losses on financial and non-financial assets in the banking book: 239 million EUR
- 3-year cumulative losses from the stress in the trading book: 377 million EUR
- CET1 capital: 2,224 million EUR
- Total Risk Exposure: 22,913 million EUR
- CET1 ratio: 9.7%
Memorandum Items
Adverse Scenario
- Common EU-wide CET1 Threshold (5.5%): 1,393 million EUR
- Total amount of instruments with mandatory conversion into ordinary shares: 0
- Total Additional Tier 1 and Tier 2 instruments eligible as regulatory capital: 0
- Eligible instruments whose trigger is above CET1 capital ratio in the adverse scenario: 0
Baseline Scenario
- Common EU-wide CET1 Threshold (8.0%): 1,833 million EUR
Risk Exposure Analysis
Baseline Scenario (as of 31 December 2013)
| Category | LTV % | Exposure Values (F-IRB) | Exposure Values (A-IRB) | Exposure Values (STA) | Risk Exposure (F-IRB) | Risk Exposure (A-IRB) | Risk Exposure (STA) | Value Adjustments and Provisions (F-IRB) | Value Adjustments and Provisions (A-IRB) | Value Adjustments and Provisions (STA) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Central banks and central governments | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Institutions | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Corporates | - | 14,449 | 8,455 | 3,231 | 6,773 | 2,870 | 3,043 | 273 | 252 | 24 |
| Corporates - Specialised Lending | - | 0 | 0 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 | 1,455 | 52 | 52 | 52 |
| Corporates - SME | - | 4,734 | 5,020 | 2 | 1,563 | 23 | 2 | 50 | 50 | 20 |
| Retail | - | 0 | 9,028 | 143 | 0 | 568 | 59 | 0 | 0 | 7 |
| Retail - Secured on real estate property | 50.5% | 0 | 8,945 | 143 | 0 | 556 | 59 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| Retail - Secured on real estate property - Of Which: SME | 52.1% | 0 | 1,950 | 47 | 0 | 58 | 16 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Retail - Secured on real estate property - Of Which: non-SME | 50.1% | 0 | 6,995 | 96 | 0 | 492 | 43 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| Retail - Qualifying Revolving | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Retail - Other Retail | - | 0 | 83 | 1 | 0 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Retail - Other Retail - Of Which: SME | - | 0 | 23 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Retail - Other Retail - Of Which: non-SME | - | 0 | 60 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Equity | - | 430 | 0 | 0 | 1,259 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Securitisation | - | 34 | 0 | 764 | 6 | 0 | 2,182 | 0 | 0 | 12 |
| Other non-credit obligation assets | - | 190 | 0 | 1 | 190 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| TOTAL | - | 27,663 | 9,028 | 4,9890 | 12,588 | 5,475 | 131 | 191 | 87 | 25 |
Adverse Scenario (as of 31 December 2013)
| Category | LTV % | Exposure Values (F-IRB) | Exposure Values (A-IRB) | Exposure Values (STA) | Risk Exposure (F-IRB) | Risk Exposure (A-IRB) | Risk Exposure (STA) | Value Adjustments and Provisions (F-IRB) | Value Adjustments and Provisions (A-IRB) | Value Adjustments and Provisions (STA) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Central banks and central governments | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Institutions | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Corporates | - | 14,449 | 8,455 | 3,231 | 6,773 | 2,870 | 3,043 | 273 | 252 | 24 |
| Corporates - Specialised Lending | - | 0 | 0 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 | 1,455 | 52 | 52 | 52 |
| Corporates - SME | - | 4,734 | 5,020 | 2 | 1,563 | 23 | 2 | 50 | 50 | 20 |
| Retail | - | 0 | 9,028 | 143 | 0 | 568 | 59 | 0 | 0 | 7 |
| Retail - Secured on real estate property | 50.5% | 0 | 8,945 | 143 | 0 | 556 | 59 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| Retail - Secured on real estate property - Of Which: SME | 52.1% | 0 | 1,950 | 47 | 0 | 58 | 16 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Retail - Secured on real estate property - Of Which: non-SME | 50.1% | 0 | 6,995 | 96 | 0 | 492 | 43 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| Retail - Qualifying Revolving | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Retail - Other Retail | - | 0 | 83 | 1 | 0 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Retail - Other Retail - Of Which: SME | - | 0 | 23 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Retail - Other Retail - Of Which: non-SME | - | 0 | 60 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Equity | - | 429 | 0 | 0 | 1,258 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Securitisation | - | 34 | 0 | 764 | 6 | 0 | 2,182 | 0 | 0 | 12 |
| Other non-credit obligation assets | - | 190 | 0 | 1 | 190 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| TOTAL | - | 19,005 | 8,951 | 4,9890 | 12,588 | 5,475 | 131 | 191 | 87 | 25 |
Summary of Key Outcomes
-
CET1 Ratio:
- Baseline Scenario: 9.7% (as of 31 December 2016)
- Adverse Scenario: 7.3% (as of 31 December 2016)
- The CET1 ratio decreased in the adverse scenario due to higher impairment losses and valuation losses, indicating a more severe impact on capital.
-
Operating Profit:
- Baseline Scenario: 630 million EUR over 3 years
- Adverse Scenario: 414 million EUR over 3 years
- The adverse scenario resulted in lower cumulative operating profits.
-
Impairment Losses:
- Baseline Scenario: 239 million EUR over 3 years
- Adverse Scenario: 555 million EUR over 3 years
- The adverse scenario led to significantly higher impairment losses, affecting the bank's profitability.
-
Trading Book Losses:
- Baseline Scenario: 377 million EUR
- Adverse Scenario: 428 million EUR
- Trading book losses increased in the adverse scenario, indicating greater stress on market-related assets.
-
Valuation Losses:
- Adverse Scenario: 26 million EUR
- These losses were attributed to sovereign shocks, which had a negative impact on the bank's capital.
Key Observations
- The adverse scenario tested the bank's resilience to a more severe economic downturn, including sovereign debt crises.
- The CET1 ratio fell below the EU-wide threshold of 5.5% in the adverse scenario, highlighting potential capital shortfalls.
- The baseline scenario showed a more stable performance with a CET1 ratio of 9.7%, which is above the minimum requirement.
- The bank's exposure to different asset categories (corporates, retail, securitisation) varied significantly in terms of risk and loss under both scenarios.
展开完整摘要
试读结束,高清完整版pdf/doc/ppt,请点下载