EBA欧洲银行-EBA_TR_DE_851WYGNLUQLFZBSYGB56_29页_5mb
报告摘要
2016 EU-wide Stress Test Summary
Core Information
- Bank Name: Commerzbank AG
- LEI Code: 851WYGNLUQLFZBSYGB56
- Country Code: DE (Germany)
- Test Period: 2016 EU-wide Stress Test
- Reported Date: 31/12/2015
Key Financial Metrics
| Metric | Actual (Starting Point) | Baseline Scenario (31/12/2018) | Adverse Scenario (31/12/2018) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cumulative 3y: Net interest income | - | 12,651.45 mln EUR | 10,624.51 mln EUR |
| Cumulative 3y: Gains or (-) losses on financial assets and liabilities held for trading | - | 3,519.28 mln EUR | 403.06 mln EUR |
| Cumulative 3y: Impairment or (-) reversal of impairment on financial assets | - | -3,440.07 mln EUR | -5,137.82 mln EUR |
| Cumulative 3y: Profit or (-) loss for the year | - | 1,639.79 mln EUR | -4,854.09 mln EUR |
| Coverage ratio - Default stock | 47.33% | 41.08% | 41.62% |
| Common Equity Tier 1 (CET1) capital | 27,303.40 mln EUR | 26,243.05 mln EUR | 16,094.68 mln EUR |
| CET1 ratio, % | 13.8% | 13.1% | 7.4% |
| Fully loaded CET1 ratio, % | 12.1% | 13.1% | 7.4% |
| Tier 1 capital | 27,303.40 mln EUR | 27,146.44 mln EUR | 16,998.06 mln EUR |
| Total leverage ratio exposures | 531,531.00 mln EUR | 531,531.00 mln EUR | 531,531.00 mln EUR |
| Leverage ratio, % | 5.1% | 5.1% | 3.2% |
| Fully loaded leverage ratio, % | 4.5% | 5.0% | 3.0% |
Main Findings
-
Profitability under stress scenarios:
- In the baseline scenario, Commerzbank AG reported a profit of 1,639.79 mln EUR over the three years.
- In the adverse scenario, the bank experienced a significant loss of -4,854.09 mln EUR, indicating a substantial decline in profitability under severe stress conditions.
-
Capital adequacy ratios:
- CET1 ratio decreased from 13.8% (actual) to 13.1% (baseline) and further to 7.4% (adverse), showing a weakening capital position in the adverse scenario.
- Fully loaded CET1 ratio also dropped from 12.1% to 7.4%, highlighting the impact of stress on capital adequacy.
-
Leverage ratio:
- The leverage ratio remained constant at 5.1% in both baseline and actual scenarios but dropped to 3.2% in the adverse scenario, indicating a potential capital shortfall under stress.
Credit Risk Exposure (IRB Methodology)
Germany
| Category | Exposure Values (A-IRB, F-IRB) | Risk Exposure Amounts (A-IRB, F-IRB) | Stock of Provisions | Coverage Ratio - Default Stock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Central banks and central governments | 21,881 / 0 | 6,986 / 0 | 17 / 0 | 99.9% |
| Institutions | 56,159 / 169 | 23,664 / 0 | 156 / 53 | 21.3% |
| Corporates | 145,076 / 5,341 | 79,008 / 1,472 | 641 / 2,497 | 45.2% |
| Corporates - Specialised Lending | 11,603 / 1,178 | 7,596 / 4,407 | 167 / 441 | 39.6% |
| Corporates - SME | 10,311 / 441 | 5,212 / 4,407 | 214 / 26 | 48.7% |
| Retail | 89,487 / 908 | 12,546 / 980 | 353 / 26 | 39.3% |
| Retail - Secured on real estate property | 58,087 / 323 | 6,859 / 4,085 | 65 / 495 | 20.3% |
| Retail - Secured on real estate property - SME | 45,907 / 660 | 5,212 / 4,085 | 161 / 258 | 20.4% |
| Retail - Secured on real estate property - non-SME | 959 / 54 | 2,127 / 4,085 | 2 / 68 | 43.6% |
| Retail - Qualifying Revolving | 64,948 / 606 | 8,398 / 2,127 | 63 / 168 | 43.5% |
| Retail - Other Retail | 9,239 / 57 | 980 / 4,085 | 33 / 25 | 50.6% |
| Retail - Other Retail - SME | 26,140 / 788 | 5,212 / 4,085 | 161 / 258 | 52.9% |
| Retail - Other Retail - non-SME | 17,514 / 474 | 4,085 / 4,085 | 68 / 258 | 49.9% |
| IRB TOTAL | 328,435 / 7,013 | 127,787 / 2,670 | 1,015 / 3,204 | 47.2% |
Poland
| Category | Exposure Values (A-IRB, F-IRB) | Risk Exposure Amounts (A-IRB, F-IRB) | Stock of Provisions | Coverage Ratio - Default Stock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Central banks and central governments | 343 / 0 | 1,754 / 0 | 0 / 0 | 0.0% |
| Institutions | 606 / 0 | 4,714 / 0 | 0 / 0 | 50.6% |
| Corporates | 7,154 / 342 | 5,968 / 3,084 | 203 / 1,342 | 43.6% |
| Corporates - Socialised Lending | 1,833 / 84 | 1,524 / 3,084 | 24 / 1,342 | 49.9% |
| Corporates - SME | 2,471 / 144 | 2,081 / 3,084 | 89 / 1,342 | 61.5% |
| Retail | 10,228 / 581 | 3,087 / 4,714 | 263 / 1,342 | 50.3% |
| Retail - Secured on real estate property | 58,087 / 323 | 6,859 / 3,084 | 65 / 1,342 | 43.6% |
| Retail - Secured on real estate property - SME | 492 / 213 | 1,661 / 3,084 | 24 / 1,342 | 52.9% |
| Retail - Secured on real estate property - non-SME | 57,628 / 330 | 4,085 / 3,084 | 53 / 1,342 | 49.9% |
| Retail - Qualifying Revolving | 9,127 / 673 | 673 / 4,714 | 32 / 1,342 | 50.6% |
| Retail - Other Retail | 22,274 / 4,714 | 1,412 / 4,714 | 159 / 1,342 | 52.9% |
| Retail - Other Retail - SME | 7,234 / 1,661 | 4,407 / 4,714 | 24 / 1,342 | 52.9% |
| Retail - Other Retail - non-SME | 12,039 / 3,053 | 4,085 / 4,714 | 53 / 1,342 | 49.9% |
| IRB TOTAL | 5,310 / 98 | 4,468 / 30 | 21 / 28 | 30.2% |
United Kingdom
| Category | Exposure Values (A-IRB, F-IRB) | Risk Exposure Amounts (A-IRB, F-IRB) | Stock of Provisions | Coverage Ratio - Default Stock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Central banks and central governments | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | 0.0% |
| Institutions | 5,099 / 63 | 1,847 / 0 | 3 / 0 | 0.2% |
| Corporates | 12,307 / 64 | 8,089 / 0 | 9 / 0 | 50.3% |
| Corporates - Specialised Lending | 2,645 / 0 | 1,675 / 0 | 0 / 0 | 28.2% |
| Corporates - SME | 289 / 0 | 111 / 0 | 0 / 0 | 61.5% |
| Retail | 127 / 54 | 14 / 0 | 24 / 0 | 43.5% |
| Retail - Secured on real estate property | 9,127 / 673 | 673 / 0 | 32 / 0 | 43.5% |
| Retail - Other Retail | 3,293 / 4,714 | 1,412 / 4,714 | 171 / 1,342 | 50.6% |
| IRB TOTAL | 17,533 / 70 | 9,952 / 0 | 148 / 0 | 7.2% |
France
| Category | Exposure Values (A-IRB, F-IRB) | Risk Exposure Amounts (A-IRB, F-IRB) | Stock of Provisions | Coverage Ratio - Default Stock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Central banks and central governments | 4 / 0 | 2 / 0 | 0 / 0 | 27.5% |
| Institutions | 2,879 / 0 | 924 / 0 | 3 / 0 | 0.0% |
| Corporates | 6,136 / 64 | 3,411 / 30 | 9 / 13 | 27.5% |
| Corporates - Socialised Lending | 1,186 / 48 | 724 / 30 | 4 / 7 | 18.6% |
| Corporates - SME | 18 / 0 | 7 / 0 | 0 / 0 | 100.0% |
| Retail | 79 / 1 | 9 / 1 | 0 / 0 | 26.9% |
| Retail - Secured on real estate property | 39 / 0 | 4 / 1 | 0 / 0 | 0.9% |
| Retail - Other Retail | 31 / 0 | 4 / 0 | 0 / 0 | 66.8% |
| IRR TOTAL | 9,298 / 64 | 4,345 / 30 | 18 / 12 | 27.5% |
Spain
| Category | Exposure Values (A-IRB, F-IRB) | Risk Exposure Amounts (A-IRB, F-IRB) | Stock of Provisions | Coverage Ratio - Default Stock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Central banks and central governments | 32 / 0 | 28 / 0 | 0 / 0 | 0.0% |
| Institutions | 2,825 / 0 | 969 / 0 | 4 / 0 | 50.0% |
| Corporates | 1,679 / 113 | 1,254 / 0 | 7 / 46 | 40.6% |
| Corporates - Socialised Lending | 367 / 0 | 496 / 0 | 5 / 0 | 0.0% |
| Corporates - SME | 26 / 16 | 42 / 0 | 8 / 0 | 50.0% |
| Retail | 23 / 0 | 3 / 0 | 0 / 0 | 18.1% |
| Retail - Secured on real estate property | 13 / 0 | 2 / 0 | 0 / 0 | 4.3% |
| Retail - Other Retail | 13 / 0 | 5 / 0 | 0 / 0 | 35.4% |
| IRB TOTAL | 9,298 / 64 | 4,345 / 30 | 18 / 12 | 27.5% |
Key Observations
- Germany showed the most significant credit risk exposure, with a large amount of risk exposure and a relatively high coverage ratio under adverse conditions.
- Poland and Spain had much smaller exposures and coverage ratios, suggesting a lower level of risk in their portfolios.
- United Kingdom and France exhibited minimal exposure and very low coverage ratios, indicating a more resilient position in the adverse scenario.
- Coverage ratios across all countries dropped significantly in the adverse scenario, with Germany having the highest ratio at 47.2% and Poland at 30.2%.
- Provisions for defaulted assets were minimal across all countries, suggesting limited expected losses under stress scenarios.
Conclusion
The 2016 EU-wide Stress Test highlights the varying levels of credit risk exposure and capital resilience among banks in different countries. Commerzbank AG, based in Germany, faced substantial losses in the adverse scenario, with a significant decline in its CET1 and leverage ratios. The test underscores the importance of capital adequacy and risk management under stress conditions, with coverage ratios and provisions playing a critical role in assessing the bank's ability to absorb losses.
展开完整摘要
试读结束,高清完整版pdf/doc/ppt,请点下载